Commerce and antitrust regulations; amount in controversy, costs

  1. Law
  2. USC 28
  3. Judiciary And Judicial Procedure
  4. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
  5. DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION
  6. Commerce and antitrust regulations; amount in controversy, costs

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

§1337. Commerce and antitrust regulations; amount in controversy, costs

(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action or proceeding arising under any Act of Congress regulating commerce or protecting trade and commerce against restraints and monopolies: Provided, however, That the district courts shall have original jurisdiction of an action brought under section 11706 or 14706 of title 49, only if the matter in controversy for each receipt or bill of lading exceeds $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs.

(b) Except when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States, where a plaintiff who files the case under section 11706 or 14706 of title 49, originally in the Federal courts is finally adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the sum or value of $10,000, computed without regard to any setoff or counterclaim to which the defendant may be adjudged to be entitled, and exclusive of any interest and costs, the district court may deny costs to the plaintiff and, in addition, may impose costs on the plaintiff.

(c) The district courts shall not have jurisdiction under this section of any matter within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under chapter 95 of this title.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 931 ; Pub. L. 95–486, §9(a), Oct. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 1633 ; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §505, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743 ; Pub. L. 97–449, §5(f), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2442 ; Pub. L. 104–88, title III, §305(a)(3), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 944 .)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(8), (23) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, pars. 8, 23, 36 Stat. 1092 , 1093; Oct. 22, 1913, ch. 32, 38 Stat. 219 ).

Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits", in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Changes were made in phraseology.

Amendments

1995-Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 104–88 substituted "11706 or 14706" for "11707".

1983-Pub. L. 97–449 substituted "section 11707 of title 49" for "section 20(11) of part I of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. 20(11)) or section 219 of part II of such Act (49 U.S.C. 319)" wherever appearing.

1980-Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–417 added subsec. (c).

1978-Pub. L. 95–486 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted proviso giving the district courts original jurisdiction of actions brought under sections 20(11) and 219 of the Interstate Commerce Act when the amounts in controversy for each receipt exceed $10,000, exclusive of interests and costs, and added subsec. (b).

Effective Date of 1995 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–88 effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1301 of Title 49, Transportation.

Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.