Inconvenient forum

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

  • (a) A court of this State which has jurisdiction under this chapter to make a child-custody determination may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any time if it determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances and that a court of another State is a more appropriate forum. The issue of inconvenient forum may be raised upon motion of a party, the court's own motion, or request of another court.

  • (b) Before determining whether it is an inconvenient forum, a court of this State shall consider whether it is appropriate for a court of another State to exercise jurisdiction. For this purpose, the court shall allow the parties to submit information and shall consider all relevant factors, including:

    • (1) whether domestic violence has occurred and is likely to continue in the future and which State could best protect the parties and the child;

    • (2) the length of time the child has resided outside this State;

    • (3) the distance between the court in this State and the court in the State that would assume jurisdiction;

    • (4) the relative financial circumstances of the parties;

    • (5) any agreement of the parties as to which State should assume jurisdiction;

    • (6) the nature and location of the evidence required to resolve the pending litigation, including testimony of the child;

    • (7) the ability of the court of each State to decide the issue expeditiously and the procedures necessary to present the evidence; and

    • (8) the familiarity of the court of each State with the facts and issues in the pending litigation.

  • (c) If a court of this State determines that it is an inconvenient forum and that a court of another State is a more appropriate forum, it shall stay the proceedings upon condition that a child-custody proceeding be promptly commenced in another designated State and may impose any other condition the court considers just and proper.

  • (d) A court of this State may decline to exercise its jurisdiction under this chapter if a child-custody determination is incidental to an action for divorce or another proceeding while still retaining jurisdiction over the divorce or other proceeding.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.