Review of rules -- Criteria.

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.



  • (1) As used in this section, "court rule" means a new court rule, a proposal for court rule, or an existing court rule.
  • (2) The committee:
    • (a) shall review and evaluate a submission of:
      • (i) a court rule; or
      • (ii) a proposal for court rule; and
    • (b) may review an existing court rule.
  • (3) The committee shall conduct a review of a court rule described in Subsection (2) based on the following criteria:
    • (a) whether the court rule is authorized by the state constitution or by statute;
    • (b) if authorized by statute, whether the court rule complies with legislative intent;
    • (c) whether the court rule is in conflict with existing statute or governs a policy expressed in statute;
    • (d) whether the court rule is primarily substantive or procedural in nature;
    • (e) whether the court rule infringes on the powers of the executive or legislative branch of government;
    • (f) the impact of the court rule on an affected person;
    • (g) the purpose for the court rule, and if applicable, the reason for a change to an existing court rule;
    • (h) the anticipated cost or savings due to the court rule to:
      • (i) the state budget;
      • (ii) local governments; and
      • (iii) individuals; and
    • (i) the cost to an affected person of complying with the court rule.




Download our app to see the most-to-date content.