Presumption of Impairment — Notice of Penalties for Additional Offenses — Allegation of Prior Convictions — Mandatory Service of Minimum Sentence — No Defense That Person Is Lawful User of Substance — Strip Searches — Jurisdiction of General Sessions Court — Part Definitions

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

  1. For the purpose of proving a violation of § 55-10-401(a)(1), evidence that there was, at the time alleged, eight-hundredths of one percent (0.08%) or more by weight of alcohol in the defendant's blood shall create a presumption that the defendant's ability to drive was sufficiently impaired thereby to constitute a violation of § 55-10-401(1).
    1. Any person convicted of an initial or subsequent offense shall be advised, in writing, of the penalty for second and subsequent convictions, and, in addition, when pronouncing sentence the judge shall advise the defendant of the penalties for additional offenses. Written notice by the judge shall inform the defendant that a conviction for the offense of driving under the influence of an intoxicant committed in another state shall be used to enhance the punishment for a violation of § 55-10-401 committed in this state.
    2. In the prosecution of second or subsequent offenders, the indictment or charging instrument must allege the prior conviction or convictions for a violation of driving under the influence of an intoxicant under § 55-10-401, vehicular assault under § 39-13-106, aggravated vehicular assault under § 39-13-115, vehicular homicide under § 39-13-213(a)(2), or aggravated vehicular homicide under § 39-13-218, setting forth the time and place of each prior conviction or convictions. When the state uses a conviction for the offense of driving under the influence of an intoxicant, aggravated vehicular homicide, vehicular homicide, aggravated vehicular assault, vehicular assault, or adult driving while impaired committed in another state for the purpose of enhancing the punishment for a violation of § 55-10-401, the indictment or charging instrument must allege the time, place, and state of the prior conviction.
  2. No person charged with violating § 55-10-401 shall be eligible for suspension of prosecution and dismissal of charges pursuant to §§ 40-15-102 — 40-15-105 and 40-32-101(a)(3)-(c)(3) or for any other diversion program nor shall any person convicted under such sections be eligible for suspension of sentence or probation pursuant to former § 40-21-101 [repealed] or any other law authorizing suspension of sentence or probation until such time as the person has fully served day for day at least the minimum sentence provided by law.
  3. Nothing in chapter 591 of the Public Acts of 1989, the Sentencing Reform Act of 1989, shall be construed as altering, amending or decreasing the penalties established in this section for the offense of driving under the influence of an intoxicant.
  4. The fact that any person charged with violating § 55-10-401 is or has been entitled to use one (1) or more intoxicants, alcohol, marijuana, controlled substances, controlled substance analogues, drugs, or other substances that cause impairment shall not constitute a defense against any charge of violating this part.
  5. No person arrested for a violation of § 55-10-401 shall be subjected to a strip search or body cavity search, unless the officer has probable cause to believe the arrested person is concealing a weapon or contraband in a body cavity. Contraband includes, but is not limited to, illegal drugs.
  6. No judge of the general sessions court has jurisdiction to punish any person violating § 55-10-401 under the small offense law.
  7. The following definitions shall apply to this part:
    1. All definitions at § 55-8-101;
    2. “Functioning ignition interlock device” means a device that connects a motor vehicle ignition system to a breath-alcohol analyzer and prevents a motor vehicle ignition from starting if a driver's blood alcohol level exceeds the calibrated setting on the device and which devices, on all new installations after July 1, 2013, must employ technology capable of taking a photo identifying the person providing the breath sample, recording the date, the time and the test result along with the photo of the person providing the test and storing such information on the device for transfer to remote storage and reporting; provided, however, that the department of safety shall permit the continued installation by an ignition interlock provider of an ignition interlock device that is not capable taking photos or recording and storing the information required by this subdivision for up to six (6) months from May 13, 2013;
    3. “Ignition interlock provider” means an entity that has been approved and certified by the department of safety to provide the installation, monitoring and removal of functioning ignition interlock devices in this state; and
    4. “Test” means any chemical test designed to determine the alcoholic or drug content of the blood. The specimen to be used for the test shall include blood, urine or breath.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.