Hearing — Notice — Right of Interested Parties to Be Heard — Determination by Committee of Question of Need of District
Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.
Within sixty (60) days after a petition has been filed with the state soil conservation committee, it shall cause due notice to be given of a proposed hearing upon the question of the desirability and necessity, in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare, of the creation of such districts, upon the question of the appropriate boundaries to be assigned to such districts, upon the propriety of the petition and other proceedings taken under this part, and upon all questions relevant to such inquiries. All owners and occupiers of land within the limits of the territory described in the petition, and of lands within any territory considered for addition to the described territory, and all other interested parties, shall have the right to attend the hearings and to be heard. If it shall appear upon the hearing that it may be desirable to include, within the proposed district, territory outside of the area within which due notice of the hearing has been given, the hearing shall be adjourned and due notice of further hearing shall be given throughout the entire area considered for inclusion in the district, and the further hearing held.
If the committee determines, after the hearing, that, upon the facts presented at the hearing and upon such other relevant facts and information as may be available, there is need, in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare, for a soil conservation district to function in the territory considered at the hearing, it shall make and record this determination, and shall define, by metes and bounds or by legal subdivision, the boundaries of such districts. In making this determination and in defining the boundaries, the committee shall give due weight and consideration to the topography of the area considered and of the state, the composition of soils therein, the distribution of erosion, the prevailing land-use practices, the desirability and necessity of including within the boundaries the particular lands under consideration and the benefits such lands may receive from being included within such boundaries, the relation of the proposed area to existing watersheds and agricultural regions, and to other soil conservation districts already organized or proposed for organization under this part, and such other physical, geographical and economic factors as are relevant. The territory to be included within the boundaries need not be contiguous. If the committee determines after the hearing, and after due consideration of the relevant facts, that there is no need for a soil conservation district to function in the territory considered at the hearing, it shall make and record this determination and shall deny the petition. After six (6) months have expired from the date of the denial of any such petition, subsequent petitions covering the same or substantially the same territory may be filed as mentioned in subsection (a) and new hearings held and determinations made on the petition.