Any person having a debt or demand due at the commencement of an action, or a plaintiff after action for any cause has been brought, and either before or after judgment, may sue out an attachment at law or in equity, against the property of a debtor or defendant, in the following cases:
Code 1858, § 3455 (deriv. Acts 1794, ch. 1, § 19, 21; 1835-1836, ch. 43, § 1; 1837-1838, ch. 166, § 1; 1843-1844, ch. 29, § 1; 1851-1852, ch. 365, § 10); Shan., § 5211; Code 1932, § 9396; Acts 1968, ch. 523, § 1 (17.05); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 23-601.
Cross-References. Attachment after creditor's bill, §29-12-102.
Exemption of public employees' retirement benefits, § 8-3516 (Vol. 3 Appendix).
Exemption of welfare grants, §§71-2-216,71-3-121,71-4-117,71-4-1112.
Mechanic's lien, enforcement by attachment, §66-11-126.
Powers of general sessions judge, §§16-15-401,16-15-804,16-15-805,16-15-806.
Real defendant in action against attaching officer, §§20-1-117,20-1-118.
Registration of abstract, §§25-5-107,25-5-108,25-5-109.
Seizure of person or property, Tenn. R. Civ. P. 64.
Sheriff's fee, §8-21-901.
Venue of actions, §20-4-103.
Textbooks. Gibson's Suits in Chancery (7th ed., Inman), §§ 328, 407, 414, 418, 423.
Pritchard on Wills and Administration of Estates (4th ed., Phillips and Robinson), § 753.
Tennessee Forms (Robinson, Ramsey and Harwell), No. 1-64-2.
Tennessee Jurisprudence, 3 Tenn. Juris., Attachment and Garnishment, §§ 4-12, 25, 30, 35, 73, 77, 86, 103, 106-112, 120-132, 138, 144; 7 Tenn. Juris., Corporations, § 121.
Law Reviews.
Commencing an Action by Garnishment, 23 Tenn. L. Rev. 211.
Constitutional Law — Pinsky v. Duncan: Due Process and the Death of a Prejudgment Attachment Statute, 21 Mem. St. U.L. Rev. 413 (1991).
Domestic Relations — 1960 Tennessee Survey (William J. Harbison), 13 Vand. L. Rev. 1121.
Enforcement of Judgments in Tennessee, 22 Tenn. L. Rev. 873.
Recent Developments in Tennessee and Federal Procedure (Donald F. Paine), 36 Tenn. L. Rev. 276.
Replevin — Prior Notice and Hearing — Due Process, 40 Tenn. L. Rev. 125.
The Constitutionality of Prejudgment Seizure of Property Under Tennessee Law (Roger W. Dickson), 38 Tenn. L. Rev. 575.
The Tennessee Court System (Frederic S. Le Clercq), 8 Mem. St. U.L. Rev. 189.
Comparative Legislation. Replevin:
Ala. Code §6-6-100 et seq.
Ark. Code §18-60-809 et seq.
Ga. O.C.G.A. §18-3-30 et seq.
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 426.450 et seq.
Miss. Code Ann. §11-37-101 et seq.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 533.010 et seq.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-472 et seq.
Va. Code § 8.01-218 et seq.
Cited: Gaines v. Fourth Nat'l Bank, 52 S.W. 467, 1898 Tenn. Ch. App. LEXIS 158 (1898); Pinkerton v. Fox, 23 Tenn. App. 159, 129 S.W.2d 514, 1939 Tenn. App. LEXIS 22 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1939); Coffey v. Durand, 27 Tenn. App. 704, 167 S.W.2d 684, 1940 Tenn. App. LEXIS 96 (1940); Anderson v. Ellington, 300 F. Supp. 789, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12591 (M.D. Tenn. 1969); Maxwell v. Hixson, 383 F. Supp. 320, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6133 (E.D. Tenn. 1974); General Electric Supply Co. v. Arlen Realty & Development Corp., 546 S.W.2d 210, 1977 Tenn. LEXIS 515 (Tenn. 1977); Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank v. Auer, 514 F. Supp. 631, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15593 (E.D. Tenn. 1977); Bodin Apparel, Inc. v. Lowe, 614 S.W.2d 571, 1980 Tenn. App. LEXIS 422 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980); W. & O. Constr. Co. v. IVS Corp., 688 S.W.2d 67, 1984 Tenn. App. LEXIS 3187 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984); Union Export Co. v. N.I.B. Intermarket, A.B., 786 S.W.2d 628, 1990 Tenn. LEXIS 102 (Tenn. 1990); Flake v. Flake, — S.W.3d —, 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 348 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 24, 2010).