Grounds for Action

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

An action lies in the name of the state against the person or corporation offending, in the following cases:

  1. Whenever any person unlawfully holds or exercises any public office or franchise within this state, or any office in any corporation created by the laws of this state;
  2. Whenever any public officer has done, or suffered to be done, any act which works a forfeiture of that officer's office;
  3. When any person acts as a corporation within this state, without being authorized by law; or
  4. If, being incorporated, they:
    1. Do or omit acts which amount to a surrender or forfeiture of their rights and privileges as a corporation;
    2. Exercise powers not conferred by law; or
    3. Fail to exercise powers conferred by law and essential to the corporate existence.

Code 1858, § 3409 (deriv. Acts 1845-1846, ch. 55, § 5); Shan., § 5165; Code 1932, § 9336; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 23-2801.

Cross-References. Chancery jurisdiction, §16-11-105.

Motor vehicles, financing sale, restraining violations, §55-13-105.

Textbooks. Gibson's Suits in Chancery (7th ed., Inman), §§ 8, 506.

Tennessee Jurisprudence, 3 Tenn. Juris., Attorney General, §§ 3, 4; 6 Tenn. Juris., Charities, §§ 2, 16; 7 Tenn. Juris., Corporations, §§ 91, 96, 98; 10 Tenn. Juris., Elections, § 16; 17 Tenn. Juris., Justices of Peace and General Sessions Courts, § 8; 18 Tenn. Juris., Mandamus, § 23; 19 Tenn. Juris., Municipal Corporations, § 18; 21 Tenn. Juris., Quo Warranto, §§ 1, 2, 4, 6.

Law Reviews.

Business Associations — 1955 Tennessee Survey (Paul J. Hartman), 8 Vand. L. Rev. 954.

Business Associations — 1961 Tennessee Survey (II) (Kenneth L. Roberts), 15 Vand. L. Rev. 840.

Constitutional Law — 1961 Tennessee Survey (James C. Kirby, Jr.), 14 Vand. L. Rev. 1171.

Judicial Review and the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act (Toxey H. Sewell), 6 Mem. St. U.L. Rev. 253.

Local Government Law — 1955 Tennessee Survey (Clyde L. Ball), 8 Vand. L. Rev. 1061.

Methods of Judicial Review over Administrative Actions in Tennessee, 13 Mem. St. U.L. Rev. 657 (1984).

Rights of Minority Stockholders in Tennessee (William I. Henderson), 27 Tenn. L. Rev. 261.

Tennessee Annexation Law: History, Analysis, and Proposed Amendments (Frederic S. Le Clercq), 55 Tenn. L. Rev. 577 (1989).

The Tennessee Court System (Frederic S. Le Clercq), 8 Mem. St. U.L. Rev. 189.

The Tennessee Court System — Chancery Court (Frederic S. Le Clercq), 8 Mem. St. U.L. Rev. 281.

Attorney General Opinions. Enforcement of statutory requirements for constables, OAG 99-025 (2/16/99).

A “duly qualified elector of the municipality” means a person qualified to vote in an election of the “municipality,” as that term is defined in T.C.A. §7-53-101(10).  Improperly appointed members of boards are generally viewed as de facto officers, and acts of such officers are considered valid.  Nevertheless, as a precaution, the board, once all of its members are appropriately appointed, may wish to review the actions taken by the earlier board and vote to ratify, confirm, modify, or reject such actions.   OAG 15-72, 2015 Tenn. AG LEXIS 73 (11/3/2015).

Comparative Legislation. Usurpation of office:

Ala.  Code §6-6-590 et seq.

Ark.  Code §16-118-105.

Ga. O.C.G.A. §45-6-5.

Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 415.010 et seq.

Miss.  Code Ann. §25-1-37.

Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 98.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-515 et seq.

Va. Code § 8.01-635 et seq.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.