Delivery and distribution of proceeds; satisfaction document.

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.


(2) A judgment creditor is entitled to recover from the proceeds of the sale all of the following costs of sale paid by the judgment creditor:

(a) Sheriff’s fees;

(b) The cost of any title report required to determine persons entitled to notice under ORS 18.918 (2);

(c) The cost of any indemnity bond or letter of credit required by ORS 18.886;

(d) Amounts that may be recovered by the judgment creditor under ORS 18.999;

(e) Services fees that may be recovered as costs under ORS 18.912; and

(f) Recording fees incurred pursuant to ORS 18.870.

(3) The court shall order that the costs specified in subsection (2) of this section be paid before application of the remaining proceeds to satisfaction of the judgment.

(4) If any proceeds from an execution sale remain after the payment of costs under subsection (3) of this section and satisfaction of the judgment, the court administrator shall pay the remaining proceeds as directed by the court in the order of distribution.

(5)(a) Upon receipt of the proceeds of the execution sale of real property, the judgment creditor shall file a satisfaction document as provided in ORS 18.225 for the amount credited against any money award portion of a judgment.

(b) The judgment debtor or other person with an interest in the real property may request in writing to the judgment creditor that the judgment creditor file a satisfaction document. If the judgment creditor does not file a satisfaction document within 10 days after receiving the request, the person making the request may file a motion under ORS 18.235.

(c) If the court finds that the judgment creditor failed to file a satisfaction document under ORS 18.225 within 10 days after receiving a written request under paragraph (b) of this subsection, the court may render a supplemental judgment awarding reasonable attorney fees to the person making the motion, unless the judgment creditor establishes that the failure to file the satisfaction document was not the fault of the judgment creditor. [2005 c.542 §35; 2007 c.166 §19; 2017 c.270 §1]


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.