Grounds for valid claim to rightful possession.

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.


(1) The things had been stolen or otherwise converted and the petitioner is the owner or rightful possessor;

(2) The things seized were not, in fact, subject to seizure in connection with the suspected supervision violation;

(3) Although the things seized were subject to seizure in connection with a suspected supervision violation, the petitioner is or will be entitled to their return or restoration upon a determination by the Department of Corrections, the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision or a court that they are no longer needed for evidentiary purposes, do not constitute a supervision violation or may be lawfully possessed by the petitioner; or

(4) The suspected supervision violator and the department have stipulated that the things seized may be returned to the petitioner. [1991 c.286 §4; 2021 c.206 §4]

Note: See note under 144.404.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.