Allocation of allowable production in field or pool.

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

A. Whenever, to prevent waste, the total allowable production of crude petroleum oil for any field or pool in the state is fixed by the oil conservation division in an amount less than that which the field or pool could produce if no restriction were imposed, the division shall prorate or distribute the allowable production among the producers in the field or pool upon a reasonable basis and recognizing correlative rights.

B. Crude petroleum oil produced within the allowable as fixed by the oil conservation division shall herein be referred to as "legal oil" and crude petroleum oil produced in excess of the allowable shall be "illegal oil".

C. Whenever, to prevent waste, the total allowable natural gas production from gas wells producing from any pool in this state is fixed by the oil conservation division in an amount less than that which the pool could produce if no restrictions were imposed, the division shall allocate the allowable production among the gas wells in the pool delivering to a gas transportation facility upon a reasonable basis and recognizing correlative rights and shall include in the proration schedule of the pool any well which it finds is being unreasonably discriminated against through denial of access to a gas transportation facility which is reasonably capable of handling the type of gas produced by that well. In protecting correlative rights, the division may give equitable consideration to acreage, pressure, open flow, porosity, permeability, deliverability and quality of the gas and to such other pertinent factors as may from time to time exist and, insofar as is practicable, shall prevent drainage between producing tracts in a pool which is not equalized by counter-drainage. In allocating production pursuant to the provisions of this subsection, the division shall fix proration periods of not less than six months. It shall, upon notice and hearing, determine reasonable market demand and make allocations of production during each proration period. Insofar as is feasible and practicable, gas wells having an allowable in a pool shall be regularly produced in proportion to their allowables in effect for the current proration period. Without approval of the division or one of its duly authorized agents, no natural gas well or pool shall be allowed to produce natural gas in excess of the allowable assigned to such source during any proration period; provided that during an emergency affecting a gas transportation facility, a gas well or pool having high deliverability into the facility under prevailing conditions may produce and deliver in excess of its allowable for the period of emergency, not exceeding ten days, without penalty. The division may order subsequent changes in allowables for wells and pools to make fair and reasonable adjustment for overage resulting from the emergency. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to any wells or pools used for storage and withdrawal from storage of natural gas originally produced not in violation of the Oil and Gas Act [this article] or the rules, regulations or orders of the division.

D. In fixing the allowable of a pool under Subsection C of this section, the oil conservation division shall consider nominations of purchasers but shall not be bound thereby and shall fix pool allowables to prevent unreasonable discrimination between pools served by the same gas transportation facility by a purchaser purchasing in more than one pool.

E. Natural gas produced from gas wells within the allowable as determined as provided in Subsection C of this section shall be referred to in the Oil and Gas Act as "legal gas" and natural gas produced in excess of the allowable shall be referred to as "illegal gas".

History: Laws 1935, ch. 72, § 12; 1941 Comp., § 69-213; Laws 1949, ch. 168, § 12; 1953 Comp., § 65-3-13; Laws 1977, ch. 255, § 50; 1985, ch. 6, § 1.

ANNOTATIONS

Cross references. — For duties of oil conservation division, see 70-2-6 NMSA 1978.

New proration formula to be based on recoverable gas. — Lacking a finding that a new gas proration formula is based on amounts of recoverable gas in pool and under tracts, insofar as these amounts can be practically determined and obtained without waste, a supposedly valid order in current use cannot be replaced. Such findings are necessary requisites to validity of the order, for it is upon them that the very power of the commission to act depends. Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation Comm'n, 1962-NMSC-062, 70 N.M. 310, 373 P.2d 809.

Findings required before correlative rights ascertained. — In order to protect correlative rights, it is incumbent upon commission to determine, "so far as it is practical to do so," certain foundationary matters, without which correlative rights of various owners cannot be ascertained. Therefore, the commission, by "basic conclusions of fact" (or what might be termed "findings"), must determine, insofar as practicable: (1) amount of recoverable gas under each producer's tract; (2) total amount of recoverable gas in the pool; (3) proportion that (1) bears to (2); and (4) what portion of arrived at proportion can be recovered without waste. That extent of correlative rights must first be determined before commission can act to protect them is manifest. Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation Comm'n, 1962-NMSC-062, 70 N.M. 310, 373 P.2d 809.

Relationship between prevention of waste and protection of correlative rights. — Prevention of waste is of paramount interest to legislature and protection of correlative rights is interrelated and inseparable from it. The very definition of "correlative rights" emphasizes term "without waste." However, protection of correlative rights is necessary adjunct to prevention of waste. Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation Comm'n, 1962-NMSC-062, 70 N.M. 310, 373 P.2d 809.

Production must be limited to the allowable even if market demand exceeds that amount, since the setting of allowables was made necessary in order to prevent waste. Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation Comm'n, 1962-NMSC-062, 70 N.M. 310, 373 P.2d 809.

When Subsection C of this section and 70-2-19E NMSA 1978 are read together, one fact is evident: even after a pool is prorated, market demand must be determined, since, if allowable production from the pool exceeds market demand, waste would result if allowable is produced. Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation Comm'n, 1962-NMSC-062, 70 N.M. 310, 373 P.2d 809.

Commission to prevent drainage between producing tracts. — In addition to making findings to protect correlative rights, commission, "insofar as is practicable, shall prevent drainage between producing tracts in a pool which is not equalized by counter-drainage," under the provisions of Subsection C of this section. Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation Comm'n, 1962-NMSC-062, 70 N.M. 310, 373 P.2d 809.

Property rights of natural gas owners. — The legislature has stated definitively the elements contained in property right of natural gas owners. Such right is not absolute or unconditional. It consists of merely (1) an opportunity to produce, (2) only insofar as it is practicable to do so, (3) without waste, (4) a proportion, (5) insofar as it can be practically determined and obtained without waste, (6) of gas in the pool. Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation Comm'n, 1962-NMSC-062, 70 N.M. 310, 373 P.2d 809.

Keeping of false records as actionable offense. — The Connally Hot Oil Act (15 U.S.C. § 715 et seq.) applies only to states which have in effect proration statutes for the purpose of preventing waste of oil and gas resources, encouraging conservation of oil and gas deposits, etc., and New Mexico is among those states which has enacted a valid comprehensive oil conservation law; since Connally Act applies to this state, keeping of false records, though not in violation of any New Mexico proration order, constitutes an actionable offense under Connally Act. Humble Oil & Ref. Co. v. U.S., 198 F.2d 753 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 909, 73 S. Ct. 328, 97 L. Ed. 701 (1952).

Law reviews. — For comment on Cont'l Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation Comm'n, 70 N.M. 310, 373 P.2d 809 (1962), see 3 Nat. Res. J. 178 (1963).

For article, "State Conservation Regulation and the Proposed R-199," see 6 Nat. Res. J. 223 (1966).

For comment on geothermal energy and water law, see 19 Nat. Res. J. 445 (1979).

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 38 Am. Jur. 2d Gas and Oil §§ 161, 164.

Rights and obligations, with respect to adjoining landowners, arising out of secondary recovery of gas, oil, and other fluid minerals, 19 A.L.R.4th 1182.

58 C.J.S. Mines and Minerals § 240.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.