Allocation or division of risks.

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

Where this article allocates a risk or a burden as between the parties "unless otherwise agreed," the agreement may not only shift the allocation but may also divide the risk or burden.

History: 1953 Comp., § 50A-2-303, enacted by Laws 1961, ch. 96, § 2-303.

ANNOTATIONS

OFFICIAL COMMENTS

UCC Official Comments by ALI & the NCCUSL. Reproduced with permission of the PEB for the UCC. All rights reserved.

Prior uniform statutory provision. — None.

1. This section is intended to make it clear that the parties may modify or allocate "unless otherwise agreed" risks or burdens imposed by this article as they desire, always subject, of course, to the provisions on unconscionability.

Compare Section 1-102(4).

2. The risk or burden may be divided by the express terms of the agreement or by the attending circumstances, since under the definition of "agreement" in this act the circumstances surrounding the transaction as well as the express language used by the parties enter into the meaning and substance of the agreement.

Point 1: Sections 1-102 and 2-302.

Point 2: Section 1-201.

"Party". Section 1-201.

"Agreement". Section 1-201.

Reasonable to require loss claims to be made within two days. — In general, a contract provision requiring claims of loss to be made within two days of delivery is reasonable, lawful and not unconscionable. Bowlin's, Inc. v. Ramsey Oil Co., 1983-NMCA-038, 99 N.M. 660, 662 P.2d 661, cert. denied, 99 N.M. 644, 662 P.2d 645.

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 77A C.J.S. Sales § 151 et seq.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.