A. Except in the case of a taking of all the units by eminent domain, a condominium may be terminated only by agreement of unit owners of units to which at least eighty percent of the votes in the association are allocated or any larger percentage the declaration specifies. The declaration may specify a smaller percentage only if all of the units in the condominium are restricted exclusively to nonresidential uses.
B. An agreement to terminate shall be evidenced by the execution of a termination agreement, or ratifications thereof, in the same manner as a deed, by the requisite number of unit owners. The termination agreement must specify a date after which the agreement will be void unless it is recorded before that date. A termination agreement and all ratifications thereof shall be recorded in each county in which a portion of the condominium is situated and is effective only upon recordation.
C. In the case of a condominium containing only units having horizontal boundaries described in the declaration, a termination agreement may provide that all the common elements and units of the condominium shall be sold following termination. If, pursuant to the agreement, any real estate in the condominium is to be sold following termination, the termination agreement shall set forth the minimum terms of the sale.
D. In the case of a condominium containing any units not having horizontal boundaries described in the declaration, a termination agreement may provide for sale of the common elements, but may not require that the units be sold following termination, unless the declaration as originally recorded provided otherwise or unless all the unit owners consent to the sale.
E. The association, on behalf of the unit owners, may contract for the sale of real estate in the condominium, but the contract is not binding on the unit owners until approved pursuant to Subsections A and B of this section. If any real estate in the condominium is to be sold following termination, title to that real estate, upon termination, vests in the association as trustee for the holders of all interests in the units. Thereafter, the association has all powers necessary and appropriate to effect the sale. Until the sale has been concluded and the proceeds thereof distributed, the association continues in existence with all powers it had before termination. Proceeds of the sale shall be distributed to unit owners and lienholders as their interests may appear, in proportion to the respective interests of unit owners as provided in Subsection H of this section. Unless otherwise specified in the termination agreement, as long as the association holds title to the real estate, each unit owner and his successors in interest have an exclusive right to occupancy of the portion of the real estate that formerly constituted their unit. During the period of that occupancy, each unit owner and his successors in interest remain liable for all assessments and other obligations imposed on unit owners by the Condominium Act or the declaration.
F. If the real estate constituting the condominium is not to be sold following termination, title to the common elements and, in a condominium containing only units having horizontal boundaries described in the declaration, title to all the real estate in the condominium vests in the unit owners upon termination as tenants in common in proportion to their respective interests as provided in Subsection H of this section, and liens on the units shift accordingly. While the tenancy in common exists, each unit owner and his successors in interest have an exclusive right to occupancy of the portion of the real estate that formerly constituted their unit.
G. Following termination of the condominium, the proceeds of any sale of real estate, together with the assets of the association, are held by the association as trustee for unit owners and holders of liens on the units as their interests may appear. Following termination, creditors of the association holding liens on the units, which were recorded before termination, may enforce those liens in the same manner as any lienholder.
H. The respective interests of unit owners referred to in Subsections E, F and G of this section are as follows:
(1) except as provided in Paragraph (2) of this subsection, the respective interests of unit owners are the fair market values of their units, limited common elements and common element interests immediately before the termination, as determined by one or more independent appraisers selected by the association. The decision of the independent appraisers shall be distributed to the unit owners and becomes final unless disapproved within thirty days after distribution by unit owners of units to which twenty-five percent of the votes in the association are allocated. The proportion of any unit owner's interest to that of all unit owners is determined by dividing the fair market value of that unit owner's unit and common element interest by the total fair market values of all the units and common elements; and
(2) if any unit or any limited common element is destroyed to the extent that an appraisal of the fair market value thereof before destruction cannot be made, the interests of all unit owners are their respective common element interests immediately before the termination.
I. Except as provided in Subsection J of this section, foreclosure or enforcement of a lien or encumbrance against the entire condominium does not of itself terminate the condominium, and foreclosure or enforcement of a lien or encumbrance against a portion of the condominium, other than withdrawable real estate, does not withdraw that portion from the condominium. Foreclosure or enforcement of a lien or encumbrance against withdrawable real estate does not of itself withdraw that real estate from the condominium, but the person taking title thereto has the right to require from the association, upon request, an amendment excluding the real estate from the condominium.
J. If a lien or encumbrance against a portion of the real estate comprising the condominium has priority over the declaration, and the lien or encumbrance has not been partially released, the parties foreclosing the lien or encumbrance may upon foreclosure record an instrument excluding the real estate subject to that lien or encumbrance from the condominium.
History: Laws 1982, ch. 27, § 30.
ANNOTATIONSCompiler's notes. — This section is similar to § 2-118 of the Uniform Condominium Act, with the following main exception: the third sentence of subsection (g) of § 2-118 of the Uniform Condominium Act, relating to treatment of any other creditors of the association as perfected lienholders on the units immediately before termination, is deleted.
COMMISSIONERS' COMMENT
1. While few condominiums have yet been terminated under present state law, a number of problems are certain to arise upon termination which have not been adequately addressed by most of those statutes. These include such matters as the percentage of unit owners which should be required for termination; the time frame within which written consents from all unit owners must be secured; the manner in which common elements and units should be disposed of following termination, both in the case of sale and non-sale of all of the real estate; the circumstances under which sale of units may be imposed on dissenting owners; the powers held by the board of directors on behalf of the association to negotiate a sales agreement; the practical consequences to the project from the time the unit owners approve the termination until the transfer of title and occupancy actually occurs; the impact of termination on liens on the units and common elements; distribution of sales proceeds; the effect of foreclosure or enforcement of liens against the entire condominium with respect to the validity of the project; and other matters.
2. Recognizing that unanimous consent from all unit owners would be impossible to secure as a practical matter on a project of any size, subsection (a) [Subsection A] states a general rule that 80% consent of the unit owners would be required for termination of a project. The declaration may require a larger percentage of the unit owners and, in a non-residential project, it may also require a smaller percentage. Pursuant to § 2-119 [47-7B-19 NMSA 1978] (Rights of Secured Lenders), lenders may require that the declaration specify a larger percentage of unit owner consent or, more typically, will require the consent of a percentage of the lenders before the project may be terminated.
3. As a result of subsection (d) [(a)] [Subsection A], unless the declaration requires unanimous consent for termination, the declarant may be able to terminate the condominium despite the unanimous opposition of other unit owners if the declarant owns units to which the requisite number of votes are allocated. Such a result might occur, for example, should a declarant be unable to continue sales in a project where some sales have been made.
4. Subsection (a) [(b)] [Subsection B] describes the procedure for execution of the termination agreement. It recognizes that not all unit owners will be able to execute the same instrument, and permits execution or ratification of the master termination agreement. Since the transfer of an interest in real estate is being accomplished by the agreements, each of the ratifications must be executed in the same manner as a deed. Importantly, the agreement must specify the time within which it will be effective; otherwise, the project might be indefinitely in "limbo" if ratifications had been signed by some, but not all, required unit owners, and the signing unit owners fail to revoke their agreements. Importantly, the agreement becomes effective only when it is recorded.
5. Subsections (c) and (d) [Subsections C and D] deal with the question of when all the real estate in the condominium, or the common elements, may be sold without unanimous consent of the unit owners. The section reaches a different result based on the physical configuration of the project.
Subsection (c) [Subsection C] states that if a condominium contains only units having horizontal boundaries - a typical high rise building - the unit owners may be required to sell their units upon termination despite objection. Under subsection (d) [Subsection D], however, if the project contains any units which do not have horizontal boundaries - for example, a single family home project where some of the units include title to land and could theoretically continue apart from a condominium as a title matter - then the termination agreement may not force dissenting unit owners to sell their units unless the declaration as originally recorded provided otherwise. Obviously, of course, if all the unit owners consent to the sale of the units, sale of the entire development would be possible.
6. Subsection (e) [Subsection E] describes the powers of the association during the pendency of the termination proceedings. It empowers the association to negotiate for the sale, but makes the validity of any contract dependent on unit owner approval. This section also makes clear that, upon termination, title to the real estate shall be held by the association, so that the association may convey title without the necessity of each unit owner signing the deed. Finally, this section makes clear that, until the association delivers title to the condominium property, the project will continue to operate as it had prior to the termination, thus insuring that the practical necessities of operation of the real estate will not be impaired.
7. Subsection (f) [Subsection F] contemplates the possibility that a condominium might be terminated but the real estate not sold. While this is not likely to be the usual case, it is important to provide for the possibility.
8. A complex series of creditors' rights questions may arise upon termination. Those questions involve competing claims of first mortgage holders on individual units, other secured and unsecured creditors of individual unit owners, judgment creditors of the association, creditors of the association to whom a security interest in the common elements has been granted and unsecured creditors of the association. Subsection (g) [Subsection G] attempts to establish general rules with respect to these competing claims, but leaves to state law the resolution of the priorities of those competing claims.
The examples which follow illustrate the relative effects of several provisions set out in the act, based on application of an assumed state lien priority rule of "first in time, first in right." In those instances, particularly involving mechanics' liens, where state law often establishes priorities at variance with that rule, that result is also indicated.
EXAMPLE 1:
HYPOTHETICAL FOR EXAMPLES 1A-1H: A condominium consists of five detached single family homes on five individually owned lots, together with a sixth lot which is undeveloped but intended for future construction of a swimming pool serving all units. The development is served by a private road. Lot 6 and the private road are common elements owned on an undivided interest basis by the unit owners.
The declaration provides that: (1) upon termination, all units and the common elements must be sold; (2) the association is permitted to encumber lot 6, and to grant a security interest in that lot for any purpose; and (3) common element interest votes and common expense liabilities are allocated equally among the units. For purposes of the example, we have assumed that the documents do not require the consent of first mortgage holders before the unit owners may vote to terminate.
The five units were originally sold at equal prices of $50,000. Common expenses in the project are $100 per unit, per month, and are used for a variety of purposes, including insurance and upkeep of the units and common elements. At the time the units were conveyed, each of them was released from all liens affecting the condominium which were senior to the declaration.
A shopping center developer has offered $380,000 for the purchase of the entire condominium. The association's members unanimously vote in favor of termination, and otherwise comply with § 2-118 [this section]. The appraisal required by § 2-118(h) [Subsection H] shows that the units are still of equal value.
EXAMPLE 1A:
At the time of termination, the 5 units were financed as follows:
Unit 1: The owner's first mortgage had an unpaid balance of $50,000.
Unit 2: The owner's first mortgage had an unpaid balance of $40,000.
Unit 3: The owner's first mortgage had an unpaid balance of $25,000.
Units 4 and 5: The owners paid cash, and there is no mortgage on either unit.
In addition, all common expenses had been paid when due. The other assets of the association, including reserves, bank account and all other personal property, total $20,000.
Under the act (§ 2-118(e) [Subsection E]), the association, following sale, holds the proceeds of sale together with the assets of the association, "as trustee for the holders of all interests in the units." In these circumstances, the interests of each party in the total value of $400,000 would be as follows:
| UNIT # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Share of | |||||
| Proceeds | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
| Due First | |||||
| Mortgage Holders | 50,000 | 40,000 | 25,000 | -0- | -0- |
| Due Owners | 30,000 | 40,000 | 55,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
EXAMPLE 1B
The facts stated in Example 1A remain true. However, at termination, unit 1 has failed to pay its common expenses for 12 months. In these circumstances, the interests of each party would be as follows:
| UNIT # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Share of | |||||
| Proceeds | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
| Due Association | |||||
| (Priming First | |||||
| Mortgage) | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| Due First | |||||
| Mortgage Holders | 50,000 | 40,000 | 25,000 | -0- | -0- |
| Due Association | |||||
| (Not Priming | |||||
| First Mortgage) | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| Due Owners | 28,000 | 40,000 | 55,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
In this example, both the lenders and the association are fully paid because the sales proceeds exceed the liens on the units. Note, however, that six months of the unpaid assessments prime the first mortgage pursuant to § 3-116(b) [47-7C-16 NMSA 1978]. Thus, if the sales proceeds had been only $50,000 per unit, rather than $80,000, the results with respect to unit 1 would have been as follows:
| Sales Proceeds | $50,000 |
| Six-Month Assessment Due Association | 600 |
| Balance | $49,400 |
| Paid to First Mortgage Holder | $49,400 |
| Loss to First Mortgage Lender | (600) |
| Loss to Association | (600) |
Of course, the association has, and the lender may have, a claim against the unit owner, personally, for the unpaid sums due them. Importantly, however, neither the other unit owners nor their units are subject to any liability for those claims.
Because the lien of the first mortgage holder, at termination or foreclosure, is junior to the first six months of unpaid assessments due the association, lenders may protect themselves under the act by requiring the escrow of six months' common expense assessments, as they often do for real property taxes.
EXAMPLE 1C:
The facts stated in Example 1B remain true. However, after all the units were initially sold, but before termination, 80% of the unit owners agree to build a swimming pool on lot 6. The association contracts with XYZ pool company to build the pool for $100,000. XYZ does not take a security interest in the common elements, as it might have done under § 3-112 [47-7C-12 NMSA 1978], and does not act to perfect any available mechanics' lien under state law. The pool is properly completed. When the association fails to pay, XYZ sues the association, secures a judgment, and properly perfects its judgment pursuant to § 3-111 [47-7C-11 NMSA 1978] (Tort and Contract Liability). As provided in § 3-111 [47-7C-11 NMSA 1978], liens resulting from judgments against the association are governed by § 3-117 [47-7C-17 NMSA 1978]. At the time of termination, XYZ has not been paid, and its claim amounts to $100,000.
Section 3-117(a) [47-7C-17A NMSA 1978] provides that a "judgment for money against the association," if perfected as a lien on real property under state law, "is a lien in favor of the judgment lienholder against all of the units." However, the last sentence also provides that the judgment is not a lien on the common elements. Accordingly, XYZ holds a $20,000 lien on each of the units as of the date the lien is perfected. In these circumstances, the interests of the parties are as follows:
| UNIT # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Share of | |||||
| Proceeds | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
| Due Association | |||||
| (Priming First | |||||
| Mortgage) | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| Due First | |||||
| Mortgage Holders | 50,000 | 40,000 | 25,000 | -0- | -0- |
| Due Association | |||||
| (Not Priming | |||||
| First Mortgage) | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| Due XYZ | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 |
| Due Owners | 8,800 | 20,000 | 35,000 | 60,000 | 60,000 |
EXAMPLE 1D:
All facts stated in Example 1C remain true, except that XYZ pool company, at the time it contracts to build the pool, takes a security interest in lot 6, pursuant to § 3-112 [47-7C-12 NMSA 1978], and that security interest includes a release of that real estate, upon default, from all restrictions imposed on the real estate by the declaration. At termination, XYZ has not instituted any action against the association to enforce its claim.
In these circumstances, XYZ, as a secured creditor with respect to lot 6, holds an interest superior to the declaration, and would have the right to exclude that real estate from the project. Any sale of the entire condominium would be subject to the superior interest of XYZ. For that reason, in the normal circumstances, the association would not be able to secure a release of that lien unless XYZ were paid in full from the proceeds of the sale, which would have the effect of reducing the value of the sale to $280,000. Note that this has the economic effect of placing the XYZ claim, at termination, ahead of prior first mortgages. For this reason, first mortgage holders will typically require their consent before common elements may be subjected to a lien.
EXAMPLE 1E:
The facts stated in Example 1C remain true so that XYZ holds only a perfected judgment lien, not a security interest in the common elements.
After the XYZ lien was perfected, a $50,000 uninsured judgment is entered against the owner of unit 4, resulting from his personal business. The lien is perfected, and rests only against unit 4. In these circumstances, the interests of the parties are as follows:
| UNIT # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Share of | |||||
| Proceeds | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
| Due Association | |||||
| (Priming First | |||||
| Mortgage) | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| Due First | |||||
| Mortgage Holders | 50,000 | 40,000 | 25,000 | -0- | -0- |
| Due Association | |||||
| (Not Priming | |||||
| First Mortgage) | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| Due XYZ | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 |
| Personal | |||||
| Lien, Unit 4 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 50,000 | -0- |
| Due Owners | 8,800 | 20,000 | 35,000 | 10,000 | 60,000 |
EXAMPLE 1F:
The facts stated in Example 1E remain true. After the swimming pool is built, a neighbor's child falls into the untended and unfenced pool, and is injured. The child sues the association. One month after the personal judgment against unit 4 is perfected, the child secures a judgment against the association for $100,000 more than the association's insurance. Under state law, the tort judgment, when perfected, constitutes a lien only from the date judgment is entered, and does not enjoy a higher priority. In these circumstances, the interests of the parties are as follows:
| UNIT # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Share of | |||||
| Proceeds | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
| Due Association | |||||
| (Priming First | |||||
| Mortgage) | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| Due First | |||||
| Mortgage Holders | 50,000 | 40,000 | 25,000 | -0- | -0- |
| Due Association | |||||
| (Not Priming | |||||
| First Mortgage) | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| Due XYZ | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 |
| Personal | |||||
| Lien, Unit 4 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 50,000 | -0- |
| Tort Lien | 8,800 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 10,000 | 20,000 |
| Due Owners | -0- | -0- | 15,000 | -0- | 40,000 |
Note that the child's lien realizes only $78,800; the estate is not entitled to participate in the proceeds available to units 3 and 5 to satisfy the unmet claims against units 1 and 4, because those units are liable only for their pro rata share of the claim, which is the same amount any of those units would have had to pay prior to termination in order to secure a partial release. Thus, if unit 5, prior to termination, had secured a partial release for $20,000 from the estate, the result would be the same.
Note also that the value of the common elements is not segregated from the values of the units, since the sales' values of the units reflect all of the value of the real estate. Similarly, note that, after termination, the tort claimant is not entitled to reach or segregate the personal property of the corporation, valued before termination at $20,000, even though he could have reached the bank account or other assets prior to termination. Any other rule would create enormous complexity, would impose arbitrary losses on creditors out of priority, and would tend to shift economic losses to unit owners who had paid their share of claims.
EXAMPLE 1G:
The facts stated in Example 1F remain true. After the unit 4 personal lien is perfected, but, one week before the tort judgment against the association is perfected, P paving company begins repaving the private road. Work is completed one week after the tort judgment is perfected. The association fails to pay P $50,000 upon completion as agreed, and P immediately records its mechanics' lien. Under state law, a mechanics' lien, if recorded within 60 days of the time work is completed, holds priority as of the day work began. State law does not, however, grant the mechanics' lien priority over any liens perfected before work began. P paving sues on its lien, and secures a judgment. In these circumstances, the interests of the parties are as follows:
| UNIT # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Share of | |||||
| Proceeds | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
| Due Association | |||||
| (Priming First | |||||
| Mortgage) | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| Due First | |||||
| Mortgage Holders | 50,000 | 40,000 | 25,000 | -0- | -0- |
| Due Association | |||||
| (Not Priming | |||||
| First Mortgage) | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| XYZ Pool Lien | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 |
| Personal | |||||
| Lien, Unit 4 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 50,000 | -0- |
| P Paving Lien | 8,800 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 |
| Tort Lien | -0- | 10,000 | 20,000 | -0- | 20,000 |
| Due Owners | -0- | -0- | 5,000 | -0- | 30,000 |
Note that, just as in the case of the tort lien, when unit 1 could not contribute its share of the mechanics' lien, the remaining units were not liable for the balance.
In the example, the common expense lien arises before the P paving lien had arisen. If the common expense lien arose after the P paving lien, we would be faced with circular liens, where: (a) the P paving lien would prime the common expense lien; (b) six months of the common expense lien would prime the mortgage; and (c) the mortgage would prime the P paving lien. Such circular lien problems, however, are not unique in the law.
EXAMPLE 1H:
The facts stated in Example 1G remain true. Assume unit 5, before termination, paid its pro rata share of both the P paving lien and the tort lien. This reduces the P paving lien to $40,000, and the tort lien to $80,000. Under § 3-117 [47-7C-17 NMSA 1978], this entitles unit 5 to a partial release of both claims, and neither P paving nor the child has a further claim against unit 5. The interests of the parties are as follows:
| UNIT # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Share of | |||||
| Proceeds | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
| Common | |||||
| Expense Lien | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| First | |||||
| Mortgage Liens | 50,000 | 40,000 | 25,000 | -0- | -0- |
| Common | |||||
| Expense Lien | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| XYZ Pool Lien | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | -0- |
| Personal | |||||
| Lien, Unit 4 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 50,000 | -0- |
| P Paving Lien | 8,800 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | -0- |
| Tort Lien | -0- | 10,000 | 20,000 | -0- | -0- |
| Due Owners | -0- | -0- | 5,000 | -0- | 80,000 |
EXAMPLE 2:
The facts stated in Example 1G remain true. Assume, however, that, at the outset, unit 5 was twice as large as the others, sold for $100,000, or twice as much as the others, and twice the common expense liability was allocated to it. At termination, it remains twice as valuable. In those circumstances, the results on sale are as follows:
| UNIT # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Sale Proceeds | 66,666 | 66,666 | 66,666 | 66,666 | 133,332 |
| Common | |||||
| Expense Lien | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| First | |||||
| Mortgage Lien | 50,000 | 40,000 | 25,000 | -0- | -0- |
| Common | |||||
| Expense Lien | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| XYZ Pool Lien | 15,466 | 16,666 | 16,666 | 16,666 | 33,333 |
| Personal | |||||
| Lien, Unit 4 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 50,000 | -0- |
| P Paving Lien | -0- | 10,000 | 13,333 | -0- | 26,666 |
| Tort Lien | -0- | 1,667 | 16,666 | -0- | 33,333 |
| Due Owners | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | 50,000 |
Note that all the liens are allocated in accordance with each unit's common expense liability, since no special provision was made for allocating the costs of the pool, the paving or the tort claim. Unit 5 probably did not contemplate the size of its exposure: nevertheless, fewer dollars were available to creditors upon termination than in Example 1G.
EXAMPLE 3:
The facts stated in Example 1G remain true, including the fact that unit 5 was originally sold at the same price ($50,000) as the remaining units. Upon appraisal, however, assume that, because of improvements, unit 5 is now worth $75,000. Three other units have remained at $50,000, while unit 1 was neglected, and is now worth only $40,000. Common expense liabilities never changed. In this example, the total value of the units is now $265,000. Since sales proceeds are distributed in accordance with fair market values, the following distribution of proceeds would apply:
| Unit 1: | (15.09433%) | $ 60,377 | |||
| Unit 2: | (18.86793%) | $ 75,472 | |||
| Unit 3: | (18.86793%) | $ 75,472 | |||
| Unit 4: | (18.86793%) | $ 75,472 | |||
| Unit 5: | (28.30188%) | $113,207 | |||
| 100.00000% | $400,000 |
| UNIT # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Sales | |||||
| Proceeds | 60,377 | 75,472 | 75,472 | 75,472 | 113,207 |
| Common | |||||
| Expense Lien | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| First | |||||
| Mortgage Lien | 50,000 | 40,000 | 25,000 | -0- | -0- |
| Common | |||||
| Expense Lien | 600 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| XYZ Pool Lien | 9,177 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 |
| Personal | |||||
| Lien, Unit 4 | -0- | -0- | -0- | 50,000 | -0- |
| P Paving Lien | -0- | 10,000 | 10,000 | 5,472 | 10,000 |
| Tort Lien | -0- | 5,472 | 20,000 | -0- | 20,000 |
| Due Owners | -0- | -0- | 472 | -0- | 63,207 |
In this example, the equal distribution of common expense liability coupled with the "fair value" distribution of sales proceeds create the greatest losses for the creditors of the association.
9. Subsection (h) [Subsection H] departs significantly from the usual result under most condominium acts. Under those acts the proceeds of the sale of the entire project are distributed upon termination to each unit owner in accordance with the common element interest which was allocated at the outset of the project. Of course, in an older development, those original allocations will bear little resemblance to the actual value of the units. For that reason, the act adopts an appraisal procedure for distribution of the sales proceeds. As suggested in the examples on the distribution of proceeds, this appraisal may dramatically affect the amount of dollars actually received by unit owners. Accordingly, it is likely the appraisal will be required to be distributed prior to the time the termination agreement is approved, so that unit owners may understand the likely financial consequences of the termination.
10. Subsection (h)(2) [Subsection H(2)] is an exception to the "fair market value" rule. It provides that, if appraisal of any unit cannot be made, either through pictures or comparison with other units, so that any unit's appropriate share in the overall proceeds cannot be calculated, then the distribution will fall back on the only objective, albeit artificial, standard available, which is the common element interest allocated to each unit.
11. Foreclosure of a mortgage or other lien or encumbrance does not automatically terminate the condominium, but, if a mortgagee or other lienholder (or any other party) acquires units with a sufficient number of votes, that party can cause the condominium to be terminated pursuant to subsection (a) [Subsection A] of this section.
12. A mortgage or deed of trust on a condominium unit may provide for the lien to shift, upon termination, to become a lien on what will then be the borrower's undivided interest in the whole property. However, such a shift would be deemed to occur even in the absence of express language, pursuant to the first sentence of subsection (d) [(f)] [Subsection F].
13. With respect to the association's role as trustee under subsection (c) [(e)] [Subsection E], see § 3-117 [§ 3-119] [47-7C-19 NMSA 1978].
14. If an initial appraisal made pursuant to subsection (f) [(h)] [Subsection H] were rejected by vote of the unit owners, the association would be obligated to secure a new appraisal.
15. "Foreclosure" in subsection (i) [Subsection I] includes deeds in lieu of foreclosure, and "liens" includes tax and other liens on real estate which may be converted or withdrawn from the project.
16. The termination agreement should adopt or contain any restrictions, covenants and other provisions for the governance and operation of the property formerly constituting the condominium which the owners deem appropriate. These might closely parallel the provisions of the declaration and bylaws. This is particularly important in the case of a condominium which is not to be sold pursuant to the terms of the termination agreement. In the absence of such provisions, the general law of the state governing tenancies in common would apply.
17. Subsection (j) [Subsection J] recognizes the possibility that a pre-existing lien might not have been released prior to the time the condominium declaration was recorded. In the absence of a provision such as subsection (j) [Subsection J], recordation of the declaration would constitute a changing of the priority of those liens; and it is contrary to all expectations that a prior lienholder may be involuntarily subjected to the condominium documents. For that reason, this section permits the nonconsenting prior lienholder upon foreclosure to exclude the real estate subject to his lien from the condominium.
Compiler's notes. — Throughout the comment, there are a number of seemingly incorrect references to various subsections of § 2-118 of the uniform act. References to the apparently correct subsections have been inserted in brackets.
The reference to § 3-117 of the uniform act in Comment 13 seems incorrect, as that section deals with other liens. Section 3-119 of the uniform act deals with the association as a trustee.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 15A Am. Jur. 2d Condominiums and Cooperative Apartments §§ 14, 51 to 56.
31 C.J.S. Estates § 153 et seq.