50-30-307. Detainer of misbranded or banned hazardous substance. (1) If a duly authorized agent of the department finds or has probable cause to believe that a hazardous substance is misbranded or is a banned hazardous substance within the meaning of this chapter, the agent shall affix to the article a tag or other appropriate marking giving notice that the article is or is suspected of being misbranded or is a banned hazardous substance and has been detained or embargoed and warning all persons not to remove or dispose of the article by sale or otherwise until permission for removal or disposal is given by the agent or the court. It is unlawful for a person to remove or dispose of a detained or embargoed article by sale or otherwise without permission.
(2) If an article detained or embargoed under subsection (1) is found by the agent to be misbranded or a banned hazardous substance, the agent shall petition the judge of the city, justice's, or district court in whose jurisdiction the article is detained or embargoed for an order of condemnation of the article. If the agent finds that an article detained or embargoed is not misbranded or a banned hazardous substance, the agent shall remove the tag or other marking.
(3) (a) If the court finds that a detained or embargoed article is misbranded or a banned hazardous substance, the article must, after entry of the decree, be destroyed at the expense of the claimant of the article under supervision of the agent and all court costs and fees and storage and other proper expenses are to be taxed against the claimant of the article or the claimant's agent.
(b) If the misbranding can be corrected by proper labeling of the article, the court, after entry of the decree and after the costs, fees, and expenses have been paid and a good and sufficient bond, conditioned that the article will be properly labeled, has been executed, may by order direct that the article be delivered to the claimant of the article for the labeling under the supervision of an agent of the department. The expense of the supervision must be paid by the claimant. The article must be returned to the claimant on the representation to the court by the department that the article is no longer in violation of this chapter and that the expenses of the supervision have been paid.
History: En. 69-7107 by Sec. 7, Ch. 394, L. 1975; amd. Sec. 30, Ch. 187, L. 1977; R.C.M. 1947, 69-7107; amd. Sec. 1841, Ch. 56, L. 2009.