Hearing and decision on acquisition of control

  1. Law
  2. Mississippi Code
  3. Banks and Financial Institutions
  4. Multistate, State and Limited Liability Trust Institutions
  5. Additional Definitions; Ownership; Governance; Mergers
  6. Transfer of Ownership Interest in State Trust Company
  7. Hearing and decision on acquisition of control

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

Not later than the sixtieth day after the date the notice is published, the commissioner shall approve the application or set the application for hearing. If the commissioner sets a hearing, the commissioner shall conduct a hearing and one or more prehearing conferences and opportunities for discovery as the commissioner considers advisable and consistent with governing statutes and rules. A hearing held under this section is confidential and closed to the public.

Based on the record, the commissioner may issue an order denying an application if:

  1. The acquisition would substantially lessen competition, be in restraint of trade, result in a monopoly, or be in furtherance of a combination or conspiracy to monopolize or attempt to monopolize the trust industry in any part of this state, unless:
  2. The financial condition of the proposed transferee, or any member of a group composing the proposed transferee, might jeopardize the financial stability of the state trust company being acquired;
  3. Plans or proposals to operate, liquidate, or sell the state trust company or its assets are not in the best interests of the state trust company;
  4. The experience, ability, standing, competence, trustworthiness, and integrity of the proposed transferee, or any member of a group comprising the proposed transferee, are insufficient to justify a belief that the state trust company will be free from improper or unlawful influence or interference with respect to the state trust company's operation in compliance with law;
  5. The state trust company will not be solvent, have adequate capitalization, or be in compliance with the laws of this state after the acquisition;
  6. The proposed transferee has failed to furnish all information pertinent to the application reasonably required by the commissioner; or
  7. The proposed transferee is not acting in good faith.

The anticompetitive effects of the proposed acquisition are clearly outweighed in the public interest by the probable effect of acquisition in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served; and

The proposed acquisition is not in violation of law of this state or the United States;

If an application filed under this section is approved by the commissioner, the transaction may be consummated. Any written commitment from the proposed transferee offered to and accepted by the commissioner as a condition that the application will be approved is enforceable against the state trust company and the transferee and is considered for all purposes an agreement under this chapter.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.