Notice to persons named in order or application; inspection of intercepted communications; postponement of notice
Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.
Within a reasonable time but not later than ninety (90) days after the date an application for an order is denied or after the date an order or the last extension, if any, expires, the judge who granted or denied the application shall cause to be served upon the persons named in the order or the application and any other parties to intercepted communications deemed appropriate by the issuing judge, if any, an inventory, which shall include notice:
Of the entry of the order or the application;
Of the date of the entry and the period of authorized interception or the date of denial of the application; and
That during the authorized period wire, oral or other communications were or were not intercepted.
The judge, upon motion, may, in his discretion, make available for inspection to any person or persons whose oral communications have been intercepted, or their counsel, any portion of an intercepted communication, application or order that the judge determines is in the interest of justice to disclose to that person.
Upon an ex parte showing of good cause to the judge, the serving of the inventory required by this section may be postponed, but in no event may any evidence derived from an order under this article be disclosed in any trial until after such inventory has been served.