§5-407. Professional evaluation
1. Evaluation; report. The respondent must be examined by a licensed physician or psychologist who is acceptable to the court, who is qualified to evaluate the respondent's alleged cognitive and functional abilities and limitations and who will not be advantaged or disadvantaged by a decision to grant the petition and does not otherwise have a conflict of interest. The individual conducting the evaluation shall file a report in a record with the court at least 10 days before any hearing on the petition. Unless otherwise directed by the court, the report must contain:
A. A description of the nature, type and extent of the respondent's cognitive and functional abilities and limitations with regard to the management of the respondent's property and financial affairs; [PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).]
B. An evaluation of the respondent's mental and physical condition and, if appropriate, educational potential, adaptive behavior and social skills; [PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).]
C. A prognosis for improvement with regard to the ability to manage the respondent's property and financial affairs; and [PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).]
D. The date of the examination on which the report is based. [PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).]
[PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).]
2. Right to decline. The respondent has the right to decline to participate in an evaluation ordered under subsection 1. If the respondent declines to participate in an evaluation ordered under subsection 1, the petitioner may request an examination under the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 35.
[PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. A, §59 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. A, §2 (NEW). PL 2017, c. 402, Pt. F, §1 (AFF). PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. A, §59 (AMD). PL 2019, c. 417, Pt. B, §14 (AFF).