§3314-C. Juvenile restitution
1. Definitions. Terms used in this section have the same meaning as in Title 17‑A, section 2002, unless otherwise indicated.
[PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
2. Mandatory consideration of restitution. This subsection applies to the mandatory consideration of restitution.
A. The court shall, whenever practicable, inquire of a prosecutor, law enforcement officer or victim with respect to the extent of the victim's economic loss and shall order restitution when authorized and appropriate. [PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
B. The order for restitution must designate the amount of restitution to be paid, that the order may be subject to modification or termination pursuant to subsection 6 and the person or persons to whom restitution must be paid. [PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
C. In any case in which the court determines that restitution should not be imposed in accordance with the criteria set forth in subsection 3, the court shall state on the record or in writing the reasons for not imposing restitution. [PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
[PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
3. Criteria for juvenile restitution. The criteria for ordering restitution to be paid by a juvenile are as follows.
A. Restitution as part of a juvenile disposition may be authorized, in whole or in part, as compensation for economic loss. In determining the amount of restitution a court is authorized to order a juvenile to pay, the court shall consider the following:
(1) The contributory misconduct of the victim;
(2) Failure by the victim to report the crime to a law enforcement officer within 72 hours after its occurrence, without good cause for failure to report within that time period; and
(3) The present and future capacity of the juvenile to pay restitution. [PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
B. The court is not authorized to order that a juvenile pay restitution:
(1) To a victim without that victim's consent;
(2) To a victim who is an accomplice of the juvenile;
(3) To a victim who has otherwise been compensated from a collateral source, but economic loss in excess of that collateral compensation may be authorized;
(4) On a joint and several basis; or
(5) When the amount and method of payment of monetary restitution places an excessive financial hardship on the juvenile or dependent of the juvenile. In making this determination, the court shall consider all relevant factors, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) The impact a restitution order would have on a juvenile, the juvenile's dependents and the juvenile's family, with particular consideration given to whether or not the juvenile or the juvenile's parents or guardians have been determined to be indigent;
(b) The minimum living expenses of the juvenile and the juvenile's dependents, including any other persons who are actually dependent on the juvenile;
(c) The special needs of the juvenile and the juvenile's dependents, including necessary travel expenses to and from work;
(d) The juvenile's present income and potential future earning capacity;
(e) The juvenile's resources;
(f) The juvenile's age;
(g) The juvenile's educational obligations;
(h) The juvenile's participation in substance use disorder treatment or mental health treatment or both;
(i) The stability or transience of the juvenile's living situation;
(j) The juvenile's access to transportation;
(k) Work restrictions on juveniles as set forth in Title 26, chapter 7; and
(l) The confinement of the juvenile as part of the juvenile's disposition. [PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
[PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
4. Authorized claimants. A court's order directing a juvenile to pay restitution is authorized only for:
A. The victim or victims, who must be natural persons, or a dependent of a deceased victim. A juvenile's obligation to pay restitution is not affected by the death of the victim to whom the restitution is due. In the case of the death of a victim, the money collected as restitution must be forwarded to the estate of the victim; and [PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
B. Any person legally authorized to act on behalf of the victim. [PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
[PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
5. Burdens of proof. At a hearing on a juvenile's capacity to pay restitution, there exists a rebuttable presumption that a juvenile who has not attained 16 years of age lacks the capacity to pay restitution. The State has the burden to rebut that presumption by a preponderance of the evidence. At a hearing in which a juvenile who has attained 16 years of age asserts a present or future incapacity to pay restitution, the juvenile has the burden of proving the incapacity to pay restitution by a preponderance of the evidence. On appeal of a restitution order, as part of a juvenile disposition, the juvenile has the burden of demonstrating that the court abused its discretion in ordering an amount of restitution.
[PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
6. Modification of orders on juvenile restitution. This subsection governs the modification of juvenile restitution orders.
A. A juvenile who is not able to make restitution payments in the manner ordered by the court shall move the court for a modification of the time or method of payment. If the juvenile establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the juvenile is unable to pay restitution in the time and manner ordered, the court may modify its prior order to reduce the amount of each installment or to allow additional time for payment. [PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
B. Upon motion of the juvenile, the juvenile's parent or parents or the juvenile's guardian, and upon notice to the State and providing an opportunity for the victim to comment on the motion, pursuant to Title 17‑A, sections 2102, 2104 and 2105, the court may review the restitution order and may modify its dispositional order to reduce or eliminate the amount of restitution ordered when the court determines that the juvenile has established by a preponderance of the evidence that payment of the current restitution order would, based on a substantial change in the juvenile's circumstances, constitute an excessive financial hardship on the juvenile or the juvenile's dependents. Additionally, if a court determines that a juvenile's failure to pay restitution was not willful and was excusable, the court may order that the juvenile complete court‑approved community service to offset the juvenile's restitution obligations at an hourly rate set by the court that may be no less than the minimum wage established in Title 26, section 664. [PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
[PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
7. Enforcement of an order of juvenile restitution. Notwithstanding section 3314, subsection 7, to enforce an order of restitution upon a finding that the juvenile has inexcusably failed to comply with the order, the court may not order confinement as a remedial or punitive contempt sanction unless the juvenile has in fact attained 16 years of age. Upon a motion by the State to enforce the payment of restitution, the court may order, in addition to other remedial or punitive contempt sanctions for an inexcusable failure to pay restitution, that a juvenile complete court-approved community service at an hourly rate set by the court that may be no less than the minimum wage established in Title 26, section 664.
[PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 2019, c. 474, §4 (NEW).