Judicial action

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

§872. Judicial action

1.  Nonconflicting-interest transaction not actionable.  A transaction effected or proposed to be effected by a corporation, or by an entity controlled by a corporation, may not be the subject of equitable relief, or give rise to an award of damages or other sanctions against a director of the corporation, in a proceeding by a shareholder or by or in the right of the corporation on the ground that the director has an interest regarding the transaction if it is not a director’s conflicting-interest transaction.  

[PL 2007, c. 289, §28 (AMD).]

2.  Conflicting-interest transaction not actionable if standards met.  A director's conflicting-interest transaction may not be the subject of equitable relief or give rise to an award of damages or other sanctions against a director of the corporation, in a proceeding by a shareholder or by or in the right of the corporation, on the ground that the director has an interest regarding the transaction, if:  

A. Directors' action regarding the transaction was taken in compliance with section 873 at any time;   [PL 2007, c. 289, §28 (AMD).]

B. Shareholders' action regarding the transaction was taken in compliance with section 874 at any time; or   [PL 2007, c. 289, §28 (AMD).]

C. The transaction, judged according to the circumstances at the relevant time, is established to have been fair to the corporation. For purposes of this paragraph, a transaction is fair to a corporation if, taken as a whole, the transaction was beneficial to the corporation, taking into appropriate account whether the transaction was:  

(1) Fair in terms of the director's dealings with the corporation; and  

(2) Comparable to what might have been obtained in an arms-length transaction, given the consideration paid or received by the corporation.   [PL 2007, c. 289, §28 (AMD).]

[PL 2007, c. 289, §28 (AMD).]

SECTION HISTORY

PL 2001, c. 640, §A2 (NEW). PL 2001, c. 640, §B7 (AFF). PL 2003, c. 344, §B69 (AMD). PL 2007, c. 289, §28 (AMD).


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.