Unnecessary to prove knowledge that dog would injure livestock

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

RS 2653 - Unnecessary to prove knowledge that dog would injure livestock

In the prosecution of actions under this Subpart, it shall not be necessary for the plaintiff to show that the owner, harborer, or possessor of the dog had knowledge of the fact that the animal would kill, harass, or wound livestock.

Acts 2003, No. 4, §1, eff. May 8, 2003.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.