p.l.146-1987 Intended to Be Codification and Restatement of Law; No Effect on Substantive Operation of Prior Law

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

Sec. 0.2. (a) The:

(1) addition of IC 10-1-1.9 (before its repeal, now codified at IC 10-12-1) and IC 10-1-2.2 (before its repeal, now codified at IC 10-12-3);

(2) amendments made to IC 10-1-2-2 (before its repeal, now codified at section 2 of this chapter); and

(3) repeal of IC 10-1-2-1;

by P.L.146-1987 are intended to be a codification and restatement of applicable or corresponding provisions of IC 10-1-2-1. If P.L.146-1987 repealed and replaced a law in the same form or in a restated form, the substantive operation and effect of that law continue uninterrupted.

(b) The:

(1) addition of IC 10-1-1.9 (before its repeal, now codified at IC 10-12-1) and IC 10-1-2.2 (before its repeal, now codified at IC 10-12-3);

(2) amendments made to IC 10-1-2-2 (before its repeal, now codified at section 2 of this chapter); and

(3) repeal of IC 10-1-2-1;

do not affect rights or liabilities accrued, penalties incurred, crimes committed, or proceedings begun before July 1, 1987. Those rights, liabilities, penalties, crimes, and proceedings continue and shall be imposed and enforced as if P.L.146-1987 had not been enacted.

(c) IC 10-1-2-11 (before its repeal, now codified at section 11 of this chapter), as added by P.L.69-2002, applies to the child or spouse of a regular, paid police employee of the state police department if the regular police employee of the state police department was permanently and totally disabled by a catastrophic personal injury that:

(1) was sustained in the line of duty; and

(2) permanently prevents the employee from performing any gainful work;

before, on, or after July 1, 2002.

As added by P.L.220-2011, SEC.235.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.