(750 ILCS 90/1)
Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Collaborative Process Act.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/5)
Sec. 5. Definitions. In this Act:
(1) "Collaborative process communication" means a statement, whether oral or in a record, or verbal or nonverbal, that:
(2) "Collaborative process participation agreement" means a written agreement by persons acting with informed consent to participate in a collaborative process, in which the persons agree to discharge their collaborative process lawyer and law firm if the collaborative process fails.
(3) "Collaborative process" means a procedure intended to resolve a collaborative process matter without intervention by a court in which persons:
(4) "Collaborative process lawyer" means a lawyer who represents a party in a collaborative process and helps carry out the process of the agreement, but is not a party to the agreement.
(5) "Collaborative process matter" means a dispute, transaction, claim, problem, or issue for resolution, including a dispute, claim, or issue in a proceeding, which is described in a collaborative process participation agreement and arises under the family or domestic relations law of this State, including:
"Collaborative process matter" does not include any dispute, transaction, claim, problem, or issue that: (i) is the subject of a pending action under the Juvenile Court Act of 1987; (ii) is under investigation by the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services pursuant to the Abused and Neglected Child Reporting Act; or (iii) resulted in a currently open case with the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services.
(6) "Law firm" means:
(7) "Nonparty participant" means a person, other than a party and the party's collaborative process lawyer, that participates in a collaborative process.
(8) "Party" means a person other than a collaborative process lawyer that signs a collaborative process participation agreement and whose consent is necessary to resolve a collaborative process matter.
(9) "Person" means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, public corporation, government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, or any other legal or commercial entity.
(10) "Proceeding" means a judicial or other adjudicative process before a court, including related prehearing and post-hearing motions, conferences, and discovery.
(11) "Prospective party" means a person that discusses with a prospective collaborative process lawyer the possibility of signing a collaborative process participation agreement.
(12) "Record" means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.
(13) "Related to a collaborative process matter" means involving the same parties, transaction or occurrence, nucleus of operative fact, dispute, claim, or issue as the collaborative process matter.
(14) "Sign" means, with present intent to authenticate or adopt a record:
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18; 100-863, eff. 8-14-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/10)
Sec. 10. Applicability. This Act applies to a collaborative process participation agreement that meets the requirements of Section 15 signed on or after the effective date of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/15)
Sec. 15. Collaborative process participation agreement; requirements.
(a) A collaborative process participation agreement must:
(b) Parties may agree to include in a collaborative process participation agreement additional provisions not inconsistent with this Act.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/20)
Sec. 20. Beginning and concluding the collaborative process.
(a) A collaborative process begins when the parties sign a collaborative process participation agreement.
(b) A court may not order a party to participate in a collaborative process over that party's objection.
(c) A collaborative process is concluded by:
(d) A collaborative process terminates:
(e) A party's collaborative process lawyer shall give prompt notice to all other parties in a record of a discharge or withdrawal.
(f) A party may terminate a collaborative process with or without cause.
(g) A collaborative process continues, despite the discharge or withdrawal of a collaborative process lawyer, if not later than 30 days after the date that the notice of the discharge or withdrawal of a collaborative process lawyer required by subsection (e) is sent to the parties:
(h) A collaborative process does not conclude if, with the consent of the parties, a party requests a court to approve a resolution of the collaborative process matter or any part thereof as evidenced by a signed record.
(i) A collaborative process participation agreement may provide additional methods of concluding a collaborative process.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/25)
Sec. 25. Proceedings pending before a court; status report.
(a) Persons in a proceeding pending before a court may sign a collaborative process participation agreement to seek to resolve a collaborative process matter related to the proceeding. The parties shall file promptly with the court a notice of the agreement after it is signed. Subject to subsection (c) and Sections 30 and 35, the filing operates as an application for a stay of the proceeding.
(b) The parties shall file promptly with the court notice in a record when a collaborative process concludes. The stay of the proceeding, if granted, under subsection (a) is lifted when the notice is filed. The notice may not specify any reason for termination of the process.
(c) A court in which a proceeding is stayed under subsection (a) may require the parties and collaborative process lawyers to provide a status report on the collaborative process and the proceeding. A status report may include only information on: (i) whether the process is ongoing or concluded; or (ii) the anticipated duration of the collaborative process.
(d) A court may not consider a communication made in violation of subsection (c).
(e) A court shall provide parties notice and an opportunity to be heard before dismissing a proceeding in which a notice of collaborative process is filed based on delay or failure to prosecute.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/30)
Sec. 30. Emergency order. Nothing in the collaborative process may prohibit a party from seeking an emergency order to protect the health, safety, welfare, or interest of a party or person identified as protected in Section 201 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986, or may prohibit a party or nonparty participant from making a report of abuse, neglect, abandonment, or exploitation of a child or adult under the law of this State.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/35)
Sec. 35. Approval of agreement by the court. A court may approve an agreement resulting from a collaborative process. An agreement resulting from the collaborative process shall be presented to the court for approval if the agreement is to be enforceable.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/40)
Sec. 40. Disclosure of information. Voluntary informal disclosure of information related to a matter is a defining characteristic of the collaborative process. Except as provided by law other than this Act, during the collaborative process, on the request of another party, a party shall make timely, full, candid, and informal disclosure of information related to the collaborative process matter without formal discovery. A party also shall update promptly previously disclosed information that has materially changed. The parties may define the scope of disclosure during the collaborative process.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/45)
Sec. 45. Standards of professional responsibility and mandatory reporting not affected. This Act does not affect:
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/50)
Sec. 50. Confidentiality of collaborative process communication. A collaborative process communication is confidential to the extent agreed by the parties in a signed record or as provided by law of this State other than this Act.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/55)
Sec. 55. Privilege against disclosure for collaborative process communication; admissibility; discovery.
(a) Subject to Sections 60 and 65, a collaborative process communication is privileged under subsection (b), is not subject to discovery, and is not admissible in evidence.
(b) In a proceeding, the following privileges apply:
(c) Evidence or information that is otherwise admissible or subject to discovery does not become inadmissible or protected from discovery solely because of its disclosure or use in a collaborative process.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/60)
Sec. 60. Waiver and preclusion of privilege.
(a) A privilege under Section 55 may be waived in a record or orally during a proceeding if it is expressly waived by all parties and, in the case of the privilege of a nonparty participant, it is also expressly waived by the nonparty participant.
(b) A person that makes a disclosure or representation about a collaborative process communication which prejudices another person in a proceeding may not assert a privilege under Section 55, but this preclusion applies only to the extent necessary for the person prejudiced to respond to the disclosure or representation.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)
(750 ILCS 90/65)
Sec. 65. Limits of privilege.
(a) There is no privilege under Section 55 for a collaborative process communication that is:
(b) The privileges under Section 55 for a collaborative process communication do not apply to the extent that a communication is:
(c) There is no privilege under Section 55 if a court finds, after a hearing in camera, that the party seeking discovery or the proponent of the evidence has shown the evidence is not otherwise available, the need for the evidence substantially outweighs the interest in protecting confidentiality, and the collaborative process communication is sought or offered in:
(d) If a collaborative process communication is subject to an exception under subsection (b) or (c), only the part of the communication necessary for the application of the exception may be disclosed or admitted.
(e) Disclosure or admission of evidence excepted from the privilege under subsection (b) or (c) does not make the evidence or any other collaborative process communication discoverable or admissible for any other purpose.
(f) The privileges under Section 55 do not apply if the parties agree in advance in a signed record, or if a record of a proceeding reflects agreement by the parties, that all or part of a collaborative process is not privileged. This subsection does not apply to a collaborative process communication made by a person that did not receive actual notice of the agreement before the communication was made.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18; 100-759, eff. 1-1-19.)
(750 ILCS 90/70)
Sec. 70. Authority of the Illinois Supreme Court. This Act is subject to the supervisory authority of the Illinois Supreme Court.
(Source: P.A. 100-205, eff. 1-1-18.)