(Code 1981, §53-7-50, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 504, § 10; Ga. L. 1997, p. 1352, § 23; Ga. L. 1998, p. 1586, § 35; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1316, § 4; Ga. L. 2020, p. 377, § 1-44/HB 865.)
Law reviews.- For article discussing methods of simplifying the administration of estates by excusing the executors from certain obligations, see 6 Ga. L. Rev. 74 (1971). For article commenting on the 1997 amendment of this Code section, see 14 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 313 (1997).
COMMENTThis section combines and replaces former OCGA Secs. 53-7-140, 53-7-141, 53-7-143 and 53-7-145. Under this section, a discharge may be granted without a hearing if no interested party files an objection to the discharge. The petition for discharge must contain a list of any known claims against the estate that the personal representative has not paid. The creditors of these claims shall be given notice and the opportunity to file objections to the discharge. Subsection (e) is modeled after Uniform Probate Code Sec. 3-1008.
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Editor's notes.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Civil Code 1910, §§ 4089, 4090, and 4091, former Code 1933, § 113-2301, Ga. L. 1953, p. 451, § 1, and former O.C.G.A. § 53-7-140 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Administrator may not petition for discharge until the administrator has fully discharged all the administrator's duties, which includes the duty of distribution. Fuller v. Fuller, 107 Ga. App. 429, 130 S.E.2d 520 (1963) (decided under former Code 1933, § 113-2301).
Judgment of a probate court discharging an executor will relieve the executor from all liability on account of the executor's administration, unless it be impeached or set aside in some appropriate manner. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Hirschfeld, 178 Ga. 581, 173 S.E. 663 (1934) (decided under former Code 1933, § 113-2301).
Retention of authority and obligations until discharge.
- Until an executor is properly discharged or otherwise relieved by law, an executor retains the authority of that appointment and the obligations of that fiduciary relationship with those the executor represents. Liner v. North, 188 Ga. App. 677, 373 S.E.2d 846 (1988) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 53-7-140).
Discharge vacated.
- Probate court's order that discharged the administrator was vacated because a party in interest could file an objection to a petition for discharge and was entitled to a hearing thereon. Here, the administrator neither listed the creditor with a disputed claim, nor did the administrator serve the creditor with notice of the administrator's petition for discharge. In re Estate of Johnston, 318 Ga. App. 324, 733 S.E.2d 856 (2012).
Judgment of discharge may be impeached.
- Judgment of the court of ordinary (now probate court) discharging administrators may be impeached in that court for irregularity, or in the superior court for fraud. Morris v. Johnstone, 172 Ga. 598, 158 S.E. 308 (1931) (decided under former Civil Code 1910, §§ 4090 and 4091).
Judgment of a court of ordinary (now probate court) discharging an administrator will relieve the administrator from all liability on account of the administrator's administration unless it be impeached or set aside in some appropriate manner. Clair v. Burke, 62 Ga. App. 607, 9 S.E.2d 119 (1940) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 113-2302).
Court did not err in sustaining general demurrer and dismissing petition seeking to hold defendant liable for money which defendant had deposited in a bank while acting as administrator since the judgment by the court of ordinary (now probate court) discharging defendant as administrator had not been attacked. Clair v. Burke, 62 Ga. App. 607, 9 S.E.2d 119 (1940) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 113-2302).
Cited in Loyless v. Rhodes, 9 Ga. 547 (1851); Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Daniel, 46 Ga. App. 129, 167 S.E. 117 (1932); White v. Roper, 176 Ga. 180, 167 S.E. 177 (1932); Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Daniel, 46 Ga. App. 129, 167 S.E. 117 (1932); Robinson v. Georgia Sav. Bank & Trust Co., 106 F.2d 944 (5th Cir. 1939); McMullen v. Carlton, 192 Ga. 282, 14 S.E.2d 719 (1941); Crow v. Martin, 66 Ga. App. 76, 17 S.E.2d 90 (1941); Neal v. Stapleton, 203 Ga. 236, 46 S.E.2d 130 (1948); Sublusky v. Fudge, 121 Ga. App. 674, 175 S.E.2d 100 (1970); Killingsworth v. First Nat'l Bank, 237 Ga. 544, 228 S.E.2d 901 (1976); Bacon v. Smith, 222 Ga. App. 542, 474 S.E.2d 728 (1996); Sublusky v. Fudge, 121 Ga. App. 674, 175 S.E.2d 100 (1970); Sinclair v. Sinclair, 284 Ga. 500, 670 S.E.2d 59 (2008).
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Editor's notes.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under former Code 1933, §§ 113-2307, 113-2308, and 113-2309 and Ga. L. 1971, p. 433, § 3, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Executor is not required to wait six months after the executor's qualification before the executor may file a petition for discharge pursuant to Ga. L. 1964, p. 269, §§ 1-3. 1974 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U74-35 (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 113-2307 - 113-2309 and Ga. L. 1971, p. 433, § 3).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 31 Am. Jur. 2d, Executors and Administrators, §§ 269, 272, 309, 900.
C.J.S.- 33 C.J.S., Executors and Administrators, § 100.
ALR.- When statute of limitations begins to run against action on bond of personal representative, 44 A.L.R.2d 807.
Appointment of guardian for incompetent or for infant as affecting running of statute of limitations against ward, 86 A.L.R.2d 965.