Persons and Agencies Permitted Access to Records

  1. Law
  2. Georgia Code
  3. Social Services
  4. Programs and Protection for Children and Youth
  5. Child Abuse Records
  6. Persons and Agencies Permitted Access to Records

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

  1. Notwithstanding Code Section 49-5-40, the following persons or agencies shall have reasonable access to such records concerning reports of child abuse:
    1. Any federal, state, or local governmental entity, tribal entity, or any agency of any such entity that has a need for information contained in such records in order to carry out its legal responsibilities to protect children from child abuse and neglect;
    2. A grand jury by subpoena upon its determination that access to such records is necessary in the conduct of its official business;
    3. A prosecuting attorney in this state or any other state or political subdivision thereof, or for the United States, who may seek such access in connection with official duty;
    4. Any adult who makes a report of suspected child abuse as required by Code Section 19-7-5, but such access shall include only notification regarding the child concerning whom the report was made, shall disclose only whether the investigation by the department or governmental child protective agency of the reported abuse is ongoing or completed and, if completed, whether child abuse was confirmed or unconfirmed, and shall only be disclosed if requested by the person making the report;
      1. Any entity that receives from a school employee a report of suspected child abuse as required by Code Section 19-7-5.
      2. Within 24 hours of receiving such report, such entity shall acknowledge, in writing, the receipt of such report to the reporting individual. Within five days of completing the investigation of the suspected child abuse, such entity shall disclose, in writing, to the school counselor for the school such child was attending at the time of the reported child abuse whether the suspected child abuse was confirmed or unconfirmed. If a school does not have a school counselor, such disclosure shall be made to the principal.
      3. As used in this paragraph, the term:
        1. "Entity" means a child welfare agency providing protective services as designated by the department or, in the absence of such agency, a law enforcement agency or prosecuting attorney.
        2. "School" shall have the same meaning as set forth in Code Section 19-7-5;
    6. Any adult requesting information regarding investigations by the department or a governmental child protective agency regarding the findings or information about the case of child abuse or neglect involving a fatality or near fatality; provided, however, that the following may be redacted from such records:
      1. Any record of law enforcement or prosecution agencies in any pending investigation or prosecution of criminal activity contained within the child abuse, neglect, or dependency records;

        (A.1) Any part of a record of the department or a governmental child protective agency that includes information provided by law enforcement or prosecution agencies in any pending investigation or prosecution of criminal activity contained within the child abuse, neglect, or dependency records;

      2. Medical and mental health records made confidential by other provisions of law;
      3. Privileged communications of an attorney;
      4. The identifying information of a person who reported suspected child abuse;
      5. Information that may cause mental or physical harm to the sibling or other child living in the household of the child being investigated;
      6. The name of a child who is the subject of reported child abuse or neglect;
      7. The name of any parent or other person legally responsible for the child who is the subject of reported child abuse or neglect, provided that such person is not under investigation for the reported child abuse or neglect; and
      8. The name of any member of the household of the child who is the subject of reported child abuse or neglect, provided that such person is not under investigation for the reported child abuse or neglect;
    7. The State Personnel Board, by administrative subpoena, upon a finding by an administrative law judge appointed by the chief state administrative law judge pursuant to Article 2 of Chapter 13 of Title 50, that access to such records may be necessary for a determination of an issue involving departmental personnel and that issue involves the conduct of such personnel in child related employment activities, provided that only those parts of the record relevant to the child related employment activities shall be disclosed. The name of any complainant or client shall not be identified or entered into the record;
    8. A child advocacy center that has a need for information contained in such records in order to carry out its legal responsibilities to protect children from child abuse or neglect;
    9. Police or any other law enforcement agency of this state or any other state or any medical examiner or coroner investigating a report of known or suspected child abuse or any review committee or protocol committee created pursuant to Chapter 15 of Title 19, it being found by the General Assembly that the disclosure of such information is necessary in order for such entities to carry out their legal responsibilities to protect children from child abuse and neglect, which protective actions include bringing criminal actions for such child abuse or neglect, and that such disclosure is therefore permissible and encouraged under the 1992 amendments to Section 107(b)(4) of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 5106(A)(b)(4);
    10. The Governor, the Attorney General, the Lieutenant Governor, or the Speaker of the House of Representatives when such officer makes a written request to the commissioner which specifies the name of the child for whom such access is sought and which describes such officer's need to have access to such records in order to determine whether the laws of this state are being complied with to protect children from child abuse and neglect and whether such laws need to be changed to enhance such protection, for which purposes the General Assembly finds such disclosure is permissible and encouraged under the 1992 amendments to Section 107(b)(4) of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 5106(A)(b)(4); and
    11. A court, by subpoena that is filed contemporaneously with a motion seeking records and requesting an in camera inspection of such records, may make such records available to a party seeking such records when:
      1. Such motion is filed;
      2. Such motion is served:
        1. On all parties to the action;
        2. On the department or other entity that has possession of such records, as applicable; and
        3. In matters other than a dependency proceeding or a civil proceeding wherein there is no related pending criminal investigation or prosecution of criminal or unlawful activity, on the prosecuting attorney, as applicable; and
      3. After an in camera inspection of such records, the court finds that access to such records appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
    1. Notwithstanding Code Section 49-5-40, the juvenile court in the county in which are located any department or county board records concerning reports of child abuse, after application for inspection and a hearing on the issue, shall permit inspection of such records by or release of information from such records to individuals or entities who are engaged in legitimate research for educational, scientific, or public purposes and who comply with the provisions of this subsection.When those records are located in more than one county, the application may be made to the juvenile court of any one such county. A copy of any application authorized by this subsection shall be served on the nearest office of the department. In cases where the location of the records is unknown to the applicant, the application may be made to the Juvenile Court of Fulton County.
    2. The juvenile court to which an application is made pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection shall not grant the application unless:
      1. The application includes a description of the proposed research project, including a specific statement of the information required, the purpose for which the project requires that information, and a methodology to assure the information is not arbitrarily sought;
      2. The applicant carries the burden of showing the legitimacy of the research project; and
      3. Names and addresses of individuals, other than officials, employees, or agents of agencies receiving or investigating a report of abuse or treating a child or family which is the subject of a report, shall be deleted from any information released pursuant to this subsection unless the court determines that having the names and addresses open for review is essential to the research and the child, through his or her representative, gives permission to release the information.
  3. The department or a county or other state or local agency may permit access to records concerning reports of child abuse and may release information from such records to the following persons or agencies when deemed appropriate by such department:
    1. A physician who has before him or her a child whom he or she reasonably suspects may be abused;
    2. A licensed child-placing agency, a licensed child-caring institution of this state which is assisting the department by locating or providing foster or adoptive homes for children in the custody of the department, a licensed adoption agency of this or any other state which is placing a child for adoption, or an investigator appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction of this state to investigate a pending petition for adoption;
    3. A person legally authorized to place a child in protective custody when such person has before him or her a child he or she reasonably suspects may be abused and such person requires the information in the record or report in order to determine whether to place the child in protective custody;
    4. An agency or person having the legal custody, responsibility, or authorization to care for, treat, or supervise the child who is the subject of a report or record;
    5. An agency, facility, or person having responsibility or authorization to assist in making a judicial determination for the child who is the subject of the report or record of child abuse, including, but not limited to, members of officially recognized citizen review panels, court appointed guardians ad litem, certified court appointed special advocate (CASA) volunteers who are appointed by a judge of a juvenile court to act as advocates for the best interest of a child in a juvenile proceeding, and members of a protocol committee, as such term is defined in Code Section 19-15-1;
    6. A legally mandated public child protective agency or law enforcement agency of another state bound by similar confidentiality provisions and requirements when, during or following the department's investigation of a report of child abuse, the alleged abuser has left this state;
    7. A child welfare agency, as defined in Code Section 49-5-12, or a school where the department has investigated allegations of child abuse made against any employee of such agency or school and any child remains at risk from exposure to that employee, except that such access or release shall protect the identity of:
      1. Any person reporting the child abuse; and
      2. Any other person whose life or safety has been determined by the department or agency likely to be endangered if the identity were not so protected;
    8. An employee of a school or employee of a child welfare agency, as defined in Code Section 49-5-12, against whom allegations of child abuse have been made, when the department has been unable to determine the extent of the employee's involvement in alleged child abuse against any child in the care of that school or agency. In those instances, upon receiving a request and signed release from the employee, the department may report its findings to the employer, except that such access or release shall protect the identity of:
      1. Any person reporting the child abuse; and
      2. Any other person whose life or safety has been determined by the department or agency likely to be endangered if the identity were not so protected;
    9. Any person who has an ongoing relationship with the child named in the record or report of child abuse any part of which is to be disclosed to such person but only if that person is required to report suspected abuse of that child pursuant to subsection (b) of Code Section 19-7-5, as that subsection existed on January 1, 1990;
    10. Any school principal or any school guidance counselor, school social worker, or school psychologist who is certified under Chapter 2 of Title 20 and who is counseling a student as a part of such counseling person's school employment duties, but those records shall remain confidential and information obtained therefrom by that counseling person may not be disclosed to any person, except that student, not authorized under this Code section to obtain those records, and such unauthorized disclosure shall be punishable as a misdemeanor;

      (10.1) Any school official of a school that a child who was the subject of a report of suspected child abuse made pursuant to Code Section 19-7-5 attends in which there is an ongoing investigation of the reported abuse. Any such ongoing investigation shall include contact with such school to obtain any relevant information from school personnel regarding the report of suspected child abuse;

    11. The Department of Early Care and Learning or the Department of Education;
    12. An individual, at the time such individual is leaving foster care by reason of having attained the age of majority, but such access shall be limited to providing such individual with a free copy of his or her health and education records, including the most recent information available; or
    13. Local and state law enforcement agencies of this state, the Department of Community Supervision, probation officers serving pursuant to Article 6 of Chapter 8 of Title 42, the Department of Corrections, and the Department of Juvenile Justice when such entities, officers, or departments are providing supervision or services to individuals and families to whom the department is also providing services. Such access or release of records shall not be provided when prohibited by federal law or regulation. Access to such records may be provided electronically.
  4. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any child-caring agency, child-placing agency, or identified foster parent shall have reasonable access to nonidentifying information from the placement or child protective services record compiled by any state department or agency having custody of a child with respect to any child who has been placed in the care or custody of such agency or foster parent or for whom foster care is being sought, excluding all documents obtained from outside sources which cannot be redisclosed under state or federal law. A department or agency shall respond to a request for access to a child's record within 14 days of receipt of such written request. Any child-caring agency, child-placing agency, or identified foster parent who is granted access to a child's record shall be subject to the penalties imposed by Code Section 49-5-44 for unauthorized access to or use of such records. Such record shall include reports of abuse of such child and the social history of the child and the child's family, the medical history of such child, including psychological or psychiatric evaluations, or educational records as allowed by state or federal law and any plan of care or placement plan developed by the department, provided that no identifying information is disclosed regarding such child. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, a foster parent, as an agent of the department, shall have access to a child's medical and educational records in the same manner and to the same extent as the department itself and to the fullest extent allowable by law to ensure the proper care and education of a child entrusted to the foster parent's care.
    1. Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection and notwithstanding any other provisions of law, child abuse and dependency records shall not be confidential and shall be subject to Article 4 of Chapter 18 of Title 50 if the records are applicable to a child who at the time of his or her fatality or near fatality was:
      1. In the custody of a state department or agency or in the care of a foster parent;
      2. A child as defined in paragraph (3) of Code Section 15-11-741; or
      3. The subject of an investigation, report, referral, or complaint under Code Section 15-11-743.
    2. The following may be redacted from such records:
      1. Medical and mental health records made confidential by other provisions of law;
      2. Privileged communications of an attorney;
      3. The identifying information of a person who reported suspected child abuse;
      4. The name of a child who suffered a near fatality;
      5. The name of any sibling of the child who suffered the fatality or near fatality;
      6. Any record of law enforcement or prosecution agencies in any pending investigation or prosecution of criminal activity contained within the child abuse, neglect, or dependency records; or
      7. Any part of a record of the department or a governmental child protective agency that includes information provided by law enforcement or prosecution agencies in any pending investigation or prosecution of criminal activity contained within the child abuse, neglect, or dependency records.
    3. Upon the release of documents pursuant to this subsection, the department may comment publicly on the case.
  6. Notwithstanding Code Section 49-5-40, a child who alleges that he or she was abused shall be permitted access to records concerning a report of child abuse allegedly committed against him or her which are in the custody of a child advocacy center, the department, or other state or local agency when he or she reaches 18 years of age; provided, however, that prior to such child reaching 18 years of age, if the requestor is not the subject of such records, such records shall be made available to such child's parent or legal guardian or a deceased child's duly appointed representative when the requestor or his or her attorney submits a sworn affidavit to the applicable child advocacy center, the department, or other state or local agency that attests that such information is relevant to a pending or proposed civil action relating to damages sustained by such child; and provided, further, that such records concerning a report of child abuse shall still be subject to confidentiality pursuant to paragraph (4) of subsection (a) of Code Section 50-18-72. Such records concerning a report of child abuse shall not be subject to release under paragraph (11) of subsection (a) of this Code section or subsection (g) of this Code section.
    1. A subpoena authorized under paragraph (11) of subsection (a) of this Code section shall be served on the prosecuting attorney who has jurisdiction over a pending investigation or prosecution of criminal or unlawful activity, if such information is known to the individual seeking such access or disclosure.
    2. A prosecuting attorney may intervene in an action involving a motion filed under paragraph (11) of subsection (a) of this Code section.
      1. When a court issues an order pursuant to paragraph (11) of subsection (a) of this Code section, the court shall issue a protective order to ensure the confidentiality of such records. Such protective order may make any order which justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense and may include one or more of the following:
        1. That the records not be reproduced except as authorized by court order;
        2. That the records be viewed or disclosed only on specified terms and conditions;
        3. That the records be sealed and only opened by court order;
        4. That the order be applicable to all parties, their counsel, and any agent or representative of a party; or
        5. That records released pursuant to such order be returned to the court upon completion of the matter that caused the production of such records.
      2. Any person who fails to obey a protective order issued under this subsection shall be punished as contempt by the court.

(Ga. L. 1975, p. 1135, § 2; Ga. L. 1990, p. 1778, § 2; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1320, §§ 1-3; Ga. L. 1993, p. 979, § 2; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1712, § 2; Ga. L. 1994, p. 967, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 1996, p. 1143, § 1; Ga. L. 1997, p. 844, § 4; Ga. L. 1998, p. 609, § 5; Ga. L. 2000, p. 243, § 3; Ga. L. 2001, p. 4, § 49; Ga. L. 2002, p. 861, § 1; Ga. L. 2003, p. 497, § 1; Ga. L. 2004, p. 645, § 16; Ga. L. 2006, p. 72, § 49/SB 465; Ga. L. 2007, p. 478, § 8/SB 128; Ga. L. 2009, p. 43, §§ 2, 3/SB 79; Ga. L. 2009, p. 453, § 2-2/HB 228; Ga. L. 2010, p. 316, § 1/HB 303; Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 4-56/HB 242; Ga. L. 2014, p. 34, § 2-10/SB 365; Ga. L. 2015, p. 552, § 10/SB 138; Ga. L. 2015, p. 689, § 5/HB 17; Ga. L. 2015, p. 845, § 1/HB 177; Ga. L. 2016, p. 160, § 3/HB 725; Ga. L. 2016, p. 864, § 49/HB 737; Ga. L. 2017, p. 344, §§ 1, 2/HB 75; Ga. L. 2017, p. 345, § 1/SB 168; Ga. L. 2017, p. 774, § 49/HB 323; Ga. L. 2018, p. 1112, § 49/SB 365; Ga. L. 2020, p. 181, § 6/HB 993.)

The 2013 amendment, effective January 1, 2014, in subsection (e), substituted "dependency records" for "deprivation records" in the introductory paragraph; substituted "Code Section 15-11-741" for "Code Section 15-11-171" in paragraph (e)(2); and substituted "Code Section 15-11-743" for "Code Section 15-11-173" in paragraph (e)(3). See Editor's notes for applicability.

The 2014 amendment, effective July 1, 2014, rewrote subsections (a) and (e); and at the end of paragraph (c)(5), substituted "a protocol committee, as such term is defined in Code Section 19-15-1" for "a county child abuse protocol committee or task force."

The 2015 amendments. The first 2015 amendment, effective July 1, 2015, in subsection (c), inserted "or her" and "or she" in paragraphs (1) and (3), substituted "department" for "Department of Human Services" in paragraph (2), and added paragraph (10.1); and added the last sentence in subsection (d). The second 2015 amendment, effective July 1, 2015, added subsection (f). The third 2015 amendment, effective July 1, 2015, added paragraph (a)(5.1).

The 2016 amendments. The first 2016 amendment, effective July 1, 2016, rewrote subsections (a) and (f); and added subsection (g). The second 2016 amendment, effective May 3, 2016, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, revised punctuation in subparagraph (a)(6)(H) and revised language in subsection (f). See Editor's notes regarding the effect of these amendments.

The 2017 amendments. The first 2017 amendment, effective July 1, 2017, added subparagraph (a)(6)(A.1); in paragraph (e)(2), deleted "and" at the end of subparagraph (e)(2)(E), substituted "; or" for the period at the end of subparagraph (e)(2)(F), and added subparagraph (e)(2)(G). The second 2017 amendment, effective July 1, 2017, inserted "a licensed adoption agency of this or any other state which is placing a child for adoption," in the middle of paragraph (c)(2); substituted "court appointed special advocate" for "Court Appointed Special Advocate" in the middle of paragraph (c)(5); deleted "or" at the end of paragraph (c)(11); substituted "; or" for a period at the end of paragraph (c)(12); and added paragraph (c)(13). The third 2017 amendment, effective May 9, 2017, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, revised punctuation in paragraph (a)(1) and division (a)(5)(C)(i), substituted "the commissioner" for "the commissioner of the department" near the beginning of paragraph (a)(10), and revised language throughout subsection (f).

The 2018 amendment, effective May 8, 2018, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, revised punctuation in the middle of paragraph (c)(5).

The 2020 amendment, effective July 1, 2020, deleted former paragraph (b)(3), which read: "Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, access to the child abuse registry created pursuant to Article 8 of this chapter shall not be permitted except as allowed by Article 8 of this chapter."

Cross references.

- Investigation of instances of child abuse or neglect in custody disputes, § 19-9-4.

Code Commission notes.

- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1993, a comma was inserted following "Lieutenant Governor" in paragraph (a)(10) (now (a)(9)).

Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2000, "complaint" was substituted for "compliant" in paragraph (e)(3).

Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2007, "and" was deleted from the end of paragraph (c)(10), and "; or" was substituted for a period at the end of paragraph (c)(11).

Editor's notes.

- Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 5-1/HB 242, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall become effective on January 1, 2014, and shall apply to all offenses which occur and juvenile proceedings commenced on and after such date. Any offense occurring before January 1, 2014, shall be governed by the statute in effect at the time of such offense and shall be considered a prior adjudication for the purpose of imposing a disposition that provides for a different penalty for subsequent adjudications, of whatever class, pursuant to this Act. The enactment of this Act shall not affect any prosecutions for acts occurring before January 1, 2014, and shall not act as an abatement of any such prosecutions."

Ga. L. 2016, p. 160, § 1/HB 725, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Child Abuse Records Protection Act.'"

Ga. L. 2016, p. 864, § 54(e)/HB 737, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "In the event of a conflict between a provision in Sections 1 through 53 of this Act and a provision of another Act enacted at the 2016 regular session of the General Assembly, the provision of such other Act shall control over the conflicting provision in Sections 1 through 53 of this Act to the extent of the conflict." Accordingly, the amendment to this Code section by Ga. L. 2016, p. 864, § 49/HB 737 was not given effect.

Law reviews.

- For article on the 2014 amendment of this Code section, see 31 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 25 (2014). For note on 1990 amendment of this Code section, see 7 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 268 (1990). For note on 1991 amendment of this Code section, see 8 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 194 (1992). For note on the 1994 amendment of this Code section, see 11 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 260 (1994). For review of 1996 social services legislation, see 13 Ga. U. L. Rev. 307 (1996). For note on the 2002 amendment of this Code section, see 19 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 331 (2002).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

If the juvenile court considers it necessary for resolution of an issue before the court, the court may order disclosure of information. Ray v. Department of Human Resources, 155 Ga. App. 81, 270 S.E.2d 303 (1980).

Procedure for obtaining records for child abuse investigation.

- When the defendant assigned error to the trial court's failure to direct the Department of Human Resources to disclose any and all reports used by or prepared by the department in investigating an allegation of child abuse, since the records sought by defendant were confidential and access thereto was prohibited except as provided by O.C.G.A. Art. 2, Ch. 5, T. 49, the proper procedure for obtaining access was to petition the trial court to subpoena the records and conduct an in camera inspection as to whether the records were necessary for determination of an issue before the court and were otherwise admissible under the rules of evidence. Defendant's general Brady motion was inadequate to have properly raised this issue in the court below, and the assertion of error in this regard was meritless. Davidson v. State, 183 Ga. App. 557, 359 S.E.2d 372, cert. denied, 183 Ga. App. 905, 359 S.E.2d 372 (1987).

Criminal defendant not entitled to records.

- In a prosecution for aggravated child molestation and related crimes, the trial court did not err in denying the defense request for the notes and work product of the social workers who testified at trial concerning the social workers' contact with the children involved. Moss v. State, 216 Ga. App. 711, 455 S.E.2d 411 (1995).

In a prosecution for child molestation, the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's request for a complete copy of files from the Department of Family and Children Services. Honeycutt v. State, 245 Ga. App. 819, 538 S.E.2d 870 (2000).

Given the fact that the defendant failed to request an in camera inspection of confidential records and files pertaining to allegations of sexual abuse allegedly committed by the defendant until appellate counsel did so in the second amended motion for new trial, the state was not obligated to produce the information and did not violate the defendant's due process rights under Brady or Georgia's reciprocal discovery act by not providing the file earlier. Moreover, some of the information was known to the defendant, and no showing that the information could have been obtained with due diligence was made. Ellis v. State, 289 Ga. App. 452, 657 S.E.2d 562 (2008).

In a child molestation conviction, after the defendant determined during trial that the state had not informed the defendant of an additional interview conducted by the victim's counselor, the state did not violate the Georgia Reciprocal Discovery Act, O.C.G.A. § 17-16-4(a)(3)(a), by failing to provide this material because the defendant had not requested an in camera inspection of the confidential therapist's records as required by O.C.G.A. § 49-5-41. Waters v. State, 303 Ga. App. 187, 692 S.E.2d 802 (2010).

Defendant not entitled to MySpace.com records.

- Trial court did not abuse the court's discretion in denying the defendant access to the incest victim's MySpace.com and school records because the defendant failed to show both the materiality and the favorable nature of the evidence sought. Stephens v. State, 305 Ga. App. 339, 699 S.E.2d 558 (2010).

Trial court did not err in failing to forward to the defendant the court's confidential file documents regarding two child molestation victims because the trial court's finding that the files contained no exculpatory evidence was alone sufficient, and the defendant made no showing that the material was exculpatory; a defendant who challenges a trial court's in camera inspection on appeal must show what information was suppressed and how that information was materially exculpatory. Tidwell v. State, 306 Ga. App. 307, 701 S.E.2d 920 (2010), overruled on other grounds, White v. State, 305 Ga. 111, 823 S.E.2d 794, 2019 Ga. LEXIS 66 (2019).

Criminal defendant should have received county child abuse documents.

- Trial court erred by failing to provide the defendant with the county child abuse documents the defendant requested during the defendant's trial for child molestation, but the defendant was not denied due process since the defendant failed to show that the trial court withheld any material, exculpatory information. Dodd v. State, 293 Ga. App. 816, 668 S.E.2d 311 (2008).

Burden on defendant to show need for release of records.

- Trial court did not err by failing to release documents showing earlier child abuse from a child's file which might have been critical to a defendant's case since the burden was on the defendant to show what documents in a child's sealed file were suppressed and how those documents were materially exculpatory and the defendant failed to make the showing. Dunagan v. State, 255 Ga. App. 309, 565 S.E.2d 526 (2002).

Trial court may not delegate duty of reviewing records.

- When a trial court subpoenas the records of the Georgia Department of Family and Children Services (DFACS) under the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 49-5-41 upon the court's finding that access to such records may be necessary, the court is required to undertake review of the records for potentially exculpatory material, and there is no statutory discretion enabling the trial court to relegate this duty to others because of their status as officers of the court; thus, after the trial court had subpoenaed the DFACS records under O.C.G.A. § 49-5-41 in the defendant's case, the trial court erred in failing to review the records in camera for exculpatory evidence and in having the prosecution undertake that review, but the error was harmless since the defendant acquiesced in the trial court's improper decision to delegate the court's duty of reviewing the records to the prosecution. Pollard v. State, 260 Ga. App. 540, 580 S.E.2d 337 (2003), overruled on other grounds by State v. Lane, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 98 (Ga. 2020).

Court's failure to provide access to records.

- Although the trial court considered the records of the Department of Family and Children Services in reaching the court's verdict, the court erred in declining to provide access to the records, erroneously believing that the parties had to request that the records be admitted into evidence or be included in the record. Donohoe v. Donohoe, 323 Ga. App. 473, 746 S.E.2d 185 (2013).

Nonprofit advocacy organization mandated under federal law to investigate incidents of abuse and neglect of individuals with mental illness should have been given reasonable access to confidential county and juvenile court records in connection with investigations relating to the organization's filing of a deprivation petition. In re A.V.B., 222 Ga. App. 241, 474 S.E.2d 114 (1996).

Cited in Napper v. Georgia Television Co., 257 Ga. 156, 356 S.E.2d 640 (1987); Pope v. State, 197 Ga. App. 832, 399 S.E.2d 552 (1990); Roberts v. State, 229 Ga. App. 783, 494 S.E.2d 689 (1997).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Release of records to Department of Education hearing officers.

- Those portions of child protective service records otherwise releasable to parents and guardians under Social Services County Letter No. 86-1 promulgated pursuant to federal court order in J.J. v. Ledbetter, C.A. No. CV180-84, U.S.D.C., S.D. Ga. (1985), may likewise be released to Department of Education hearing officers conducting hearings under the Education of All Handicapped Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq., if, and only if, (1) the parents specifically request in writing that the Department of Human Resources forward the records to the hearing officer, or (2) the Department of Human Resources receives a written request for the records from the hearing officer personally and is subsequently able to secure the written permission of the parents to forward the records to the hearing officer. 1987 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 87-25.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.