(Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., p. 305, §§ 1-5; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 47; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1402, § 19; Ga. L. 1994, p. 92, § 1; Ga. L. 2009, p. 753, § 7/SB 109; Ga. L. 2010, p. 1207, § 64/SB 436; Ga. L. 2020, p. 474, § 4/SB 176.)
Editor's notes.- Ga. L. 2010, p. 1207, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "The intent of this Act is to repeal obsolete and inoperative provisions and to make certain stylistic corrections in Title 47 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. Nothing in this Act shall deny, abridge, increase, renew, revive, or on any way affect any right, benefit, option, credit, or election to which any person was entitled pursuant to such title on June 30, 2010, and the board of trustees of each public retirement system is authorized and directed to provide by regulation for the continuation of any such right, benefit, option, credit, or election not otherwise covered in this Act; provided, however, that any such right, benefit, option, credit, or election shall be subject to the statutory provisions in effect on June 30, 2010."
Ga. L. 2010, p. 1207, § 67, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "In the event of an irreconcilable conflict between a provision of Sections 62 through 64 of this Act and a provision of another Act enacted at the 2010 regular session of the General Assembly, the provision of such other Act shall control over this Act to the extent of the conflict."
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Section permissive, not mandatory.
- It is clear that, under the language of this statute, the General Assembly used permissive words and not mandatory provisions. A close analysis of the provisions reveals that the governing authority of the county in which the court is located can deduct or collect employee contributions only from members, and there is no authorization contained therein that contributions shall apply in a mandatory manner to all officers and employees of the courts. This restrictive language, considered with the permissive words "authorized to become members," clearly shows this statute to be permissive and not mandatory. 1957 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 225 (see O.C.G.A. § 47-2-290).
Person who is both state court judge and juvenile court judge may simultaneously belong to the Employees' Retirement System, if otherwise eligible, and the Trial Judges and Solicitors Retirement Fund. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-6.
Ga. L. 1953, Jan.-Feb. Sess., p. 349, § 2 (see O.C.G.A. § 47-2-70) does not apply to Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., p. 305, §§ 1-5 (see O.C.G.A. § 47-2-290). 1957 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 225.
Merit system must be established for employees on a court to come under the retirement system. 1957 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 226.
Statute has no effect upon jurisdiction of state courts. 1970 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U70-93 (see O.C.G.A. § 47-2-290).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 60A Am. Jur. 2d, Pensions and Retirement Funds, §§ 1166 et seq., 1182, 1197 et seq.
C.J.S.- 67 C.J.S., Officers and Public Employees, §§ 161, 316 et seq.