As used in this chapter, the term:
(Ga. L. 1921, p. 166, § 1; Code 1933, § 84-501; Ga. L. 1977, p. 232, § 1; Ga. L. 1997, p. 1533, § 1; Ga. L. 2007, p. 494, § 1/SB 102; Ga. L. 2011, p. 752, § 43/HB 142.)
Law reviews.- For note on the chiropractor as an expert witness, see 15 Mercer L. Rev. 431 (1964).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Constitutionality.
- Although common merchants are allowed to sell nutritional substances to customers without a prescription, in that the substances do not require medical supervision for use and are not habit-forming, the Georgia Chiropractic Practices Act (O.C.G.A. § 43-9-1 et seq.) does not violate the equal protection clause because the statute prohibits chiropractors from prescribing or recommending such substances in the treatment of patients. Foster v. Georgia Bd. of Chiropractic Exmrs., 257 Ga. 409, 359 S.E.2d 877 (1987)(decided prior to the 1988 amendment of O.C.G.A. § 43-9-16, which added subsection (i)).
Prescribing or recommending nutritional substances.
- Since O.C.G.A. Ch. 9, T. 43 does not authorize chiropractors to prescribe or dispense vitamins, minerals, or nutritional substances, the prescription of such items for treatment of a patient's ailments constitutes the unauthorized practice of medicine in this state. Foster v. Georgia Bd. of Chiropractic Exmrs., 257 Ga. 409, 359 S.E.2d 877 (1987)(decided prior to the 1988 amendment of § 43-9-16, which added subsection (i)).
Chiropractors subject to malpractice provisions.
- Chiropractic profession must be treated equally with the professions of law and medicine for malpractice purposes. Phillips v. Cheek, 162 Ga. App. 728, 293 S.E.2d 22 (1982).
Massage is not authorized treatment.
- Because massage is not an authorized treatment modality under O.C.G.A. Ch. 9, T. 43, a contract for massage services was void and a chiropractor was not authorized to recover payment for rendering such services. Siegrist v. Iwuagwa, 229 Ga. App. 508, 494 S.E.2d 180 (1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 933, 119 S. Ct. 344, 142 L. Ed. 2d 284 (1998).
Cited in Caldwell v. Knight, 92 Ga. App. 747, 89 S.E.2d 900 (1955); Sandford v. Howard, 161 Ga. App. 495, 288 S.E.2d 739 (1982); Capes v. Bretz, 195 Ga. App. 467, 393 S.E.2d 702 (1990).
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERALDefinition of "chiropractic" is not broad enough to bring it within definition of "practice of medicine." 1972 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U72-17.
Chiropractor may not give injection, draw blood, or perform surgery.- Since there is no specific exemption found in this definition, practitioners of chiropractic would be practicing medicine if the chiropractors gave injections, withdrew blood, pierced the skin, or performed a surgical procedure. 1979 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 79-45.
Chiropractor may not administer medications.- Nowhere in this definition is there any express or implied provision that practice of chiropractic permits administration of medications, injections, withdrawal of blood, or any surgical procedure; in fact, by the express terms of the definition, a licensed practitioner of chiropractic is not permitted to use drugs or surgery. 1979 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 79-45.
Chiropractor is not authorized to prescribe, dispense, or administer vitamins or minerals in the treatment of patients. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-53 (decided prior to 1988 amendment to O.C.G.A. § 43-9-16, which added subsection (i)).
Chiropractor may not pierce the skin.- Procedures utilized for analytical, therapeutic, and diagnostic purposes which puncture the skin such as venipuncture, capillary puncture, and acupuncture are not authorized for use by chiropractors licensed in the State of Georgia since none of these procedures is utilized to make an adjustment of the articulation of the human body. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-53.
Chiropractor may not use colonic irrigations, electrical treatments, or vitamins.
- Licensed chiropractor in Georgia is not authorized to use colonic irrigations, electrical treatments (except X-ray), and vitamins in treatment of patients. 1945-47 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 488 (decided prior to 1986 and 1988 amendments to O.C.G.A. § 43-9-16, which added subsections (b) and (i), respectively; see also 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. 84-53).
Procedures for analytical, therapeutic, or diagnostic purposes such as colon lavage, barium enema, and colonic irrigation are not authorized for use by a chiropractor licensed in the State of Georgia since none of these procedures are utilized to make an adjustment of the articulation of the human body. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-53.
Limited use of electrical current.- Procedures in which the equipment utilizes electrical current but the electrical current or its immediate by-product is not introduced into the body, such as intermittent traction, intersegmental traction, and vibrators, are authorized to the extent that the traction is used according to specific chiropractic methods. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-53.
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 61 Am. Jur. 2d, Physicians, Surgeons, and Other Healers, §§ 5, 13 et seq., 26 et seq., 44, 74 et seq., 121 et seq., 131 et seq.
C.J.S.- 70 C.J.S., Physicians, Surgeons, and Other Health-Care Providers, §§ 4 et seq., 52 et seq., 71 et seq.