Assignment of Agencies to Standing Committees of Senate and House of Representatives; Public Hearings; Factors Considered in Conducting Audit

  1. Law
  2. Georgia Code
  3. Professions and Businesses
  4. Audit of Regulatory Agencies
  5. Assignment of Agencies to Standing Committees of Senate and House of Representatives; Public Hearings; Factors Considered in Conducting Audit

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

  1. The President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall assign each of the regulatory agencies to a standing committee of their respective houses for the purpose of review. When a performance audit is conducted, the Senate and House committees to which a regulatory agency is assigned shall conduct a joint public hearing or hearings for the purpose of receiving testimony from the public and from the officials of the regulatory agency involved relative to the effectiveness and efficiency of the agency.
  2. When conducting a performance audit, the state auditor shall take into consideration, among others, the following factors:
    1. Whether the absence of regulation would significantly harm, affect, or endanger the public health, safety, or welfare;
    2. Whether there is a less restrictive method of regulation available which would adequately protect the public;
    3. The extent to which the regulatory agency has permitted qualified applicants to serve the public;
    4. The extent to which affirmative action requirements of state and federal statutes and constitutions have been complied with by the regulatory agency or the profession, business, or trade it regulates;
    5. The extent to which the regulatory agency has operated in the public interest and the extent to which its operation has been impeded or enhanced by existing statutes, procedures, practices, and rules and regulations, and any other circumstances, including budgetary, resource, and personnel matters;
    6. The extent to which the regulatory agency has recommended statutory changes to the General Assembly which would benefit the public as opposed to the persons it regulates;
    7. The extent to which the regulatory agency has required the persons it regulates to report to it concerning the impact of rules and decisions of the regulatory agency on the public regarding improved service, economy of service, and availability of service;
    8. The extent to which persons regulated by the regulatory agency have been required to assess problems in their profession, business, or trade which affect the public;
    9. The extent to which the regulatory agency has encouraged participation by the public in making its rules and decisions as opposed to participation solely by the persons it regulates;
    10. The efficiency with which formal public complaints filed with the regulatory agency concerning persons subject to regulation have been processed to completion by the regulatory agency; and
    11. The extent to which changes are necessary in the enabling laws of the regulatory agency to comply adequately with the factors listed in this subsection.

(Code 1981, §43-2-3, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 3137, § 1.)


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.