(Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., p. 556, § 76; Code 1933, § 68A-405, enacted by Ga. L. 1974, p. 633, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 2048, § 5.)
Cross references.- Limitation of liability of persons rendering emergency care, §§ 31-11-8,51-1-29,51-1-30,51-1-30.1.
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Charge must fit evidence.
- Trial court did not err in refusing to give a charge on O.C.G.A. § 40-6-74 if the charge was not adjusted to the evidence. Lucas v. Love, 238 Ga. App. 463, 519 S.E.2d 253 (1999).
Construction with O.C.G.A. § 40-6-6. - Read together, O.C.G.A. §§ 40-6-6 and40-6-74 mandate that a driver has a duty to yield the right of way to an authorized law enforcement vehicle when the law enforcement vehicle approaches making use of an audible signal and visual signal under normal atmospheric conditions from a distance of 500 feet to the front of such vehicle, and furthermore the statutes do not restrict an "audible signal" to only sirens, and § 40-6-6 does not apply only when the authorized law enforcement vehicle is responding to an emergency call; accordingly, it was proper to give instructions as to §§ 40-6-6 and40-6-74 in a suit by a driver who ran into a house while the house was being moved and escorted by police vehicles. Hersh v. Griffith, 284 Ga. App. 15, 643 S.E.2d 309 (2007).
Insufficient evidence for conviction.
- There was no violation of O.C.G.A. § 40-6-74 when the evidence was that the officer's purpose was to stop the defendant for speeding and the state failed to prove that the defendant obstructed the roadway and prevented the officer from passing the defendant. Jackson v. State, 223 Ga. App. 27, 477 S.E.2d 28 (1996).
Evidence was not sufficient to support a conviction for failure to yield to an emergency vehicle since it was established that the police officer was pursuing the defendant, rather than seeking to pass the defendant. Burrell v. State, 225 Ga. App. 264, 483 S.E.2d 679 (1997).
Stop not justified as defendant did not obstruct roadway.
- Defendant's motion to suppress was properly granted as the officer lacked reasonable articulable suspicion to justify the stop of the defendant's vehicle because the defendant did not obstruct the roadway and did not fail to yield the right-of-way to the officer as the video showed that the defendant passed the patrol car in the far right lane, leaving two other empty lanes open for the patrol car to proceed forward unobstructed. State v. Shaw, 353 Ga. App. 102, 836 S.E.2d 208 (2019).
Cited in Findley v. McDaniel, 158 Ga. App. 445, 280 S.E.2d 858 (1981); Willis v. Love, 232 Ga. App. 543, 502 S.E.2d 487 (1998).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 7A Am. Jur. 2d, Automobiles and Highway Traffic, § 298 et seq.
C.J.S.- 60 C.J.S., Motor Vehicles, §§ 35, 53, 54, 56.
ALR.
- Validity of statute or ordinance giving right of way in streets or highways to certain classes of vehicles, 38 A.L.R. 24.
Right of way at street or highway intersections, 47 A.L.R. 595.
Right of way of vehicle carrying policeman, 65 A.L.R. 140.
Construction and application of statutory provision requiring motorists to yield right-of-way to emergency vehicle, 87 A.L.R.5th 1.