(Ga. L. 1965, p. 298, § 5; Ga. L. 1973, p. 778, § 4; Ga. L. 1974, p. 195, § 1; Ga. L. 1975, p. 28, § 1; Ga. L. 1979, p. 645, § 2; Ga. L. 1981, p. 1741, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 1055, § 1.)
Law reviews.- For article, "The Municipal Home Rule Act of 1965 (this chapter)," see 3 Ga. St. B. J. 333 (1967). For article surveying legislative and judicial developments in Georgia local government law for 1978-79, see 31 Mercer L. Rev. 155 (1979).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Editor's notes.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions prior to enactment of this Code section are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Mayor is not member of "municipal governing authority" and, therefore, the authority of the city council to increase the compensation paid to the office of the mayor is not subject to the strictures of this section. Savage v. City of Atlanta, 242 Ga. 671, 251 S.E.2d 268 (1978).
Meaning of phrase "governing authority".
- Generally accepted meaning of the phrase "governing authority" or "governing body," in reference to the operation of city or county governments, is a council or board performing legislative functions. Savage v. City of Atlanta, 242 Ga. 671, 251 S.E.2d 268 (1978).
In determining whether municipal officer is part of governing authority of municipality, the question is whether that municipal officer possesses legislative power. Savage v. City of Atlanta, 242 Ga. 671, 251 S.E.2d 268 (1978).
Fact that mayor of town is presiding officer of council and has power to cast tie-breaking votes does not make the mayor a member of council if the city charter provides that the mayor is not to be a member. Accordingly, even though the president of the city council is the presiding officer of the council and possesses the authority to cast tie-breaking votes, the mayor should not be considered a member of the council, since the city charter expressly provides that the mayor is not to be a member. Therefore, an increase in the mayor's compensation is not subject to this section. Savage v. City of Atlanta, 242 Ga. 671, 251 S.E.2d 268 (1978).
City not authorized to pay mayor for services of city manager.
- City is not authorized to pay to a city's mayor compensation, over and beyond the sum specified in the charter as the mayor's salary, for services ordinarily rendered by a city manager. Welsch v. Wilson, 217 Ga. 582, 124 S.E.2d 77 (1962) (decided under former law).
"Retirement benefits" construed.
- Benefits provided under a city retirement plan are retirement benefits expressly exempted under subsection (a) of O.C.G.A. § 36-35-4 and not in the nature of a pension or gratuity when the retirement plan allows council members, after a given period of time, to terminate employment and receive partial credit for past years' service toward the total required time for entitlement to a monthly payment for life. Swann v. Board of Trustees, 257 Ga. 450, 360 S.E.2d 395 (1987).
City ordinance increasing pension plan contribution rate.
- Trial court properly granted the city defendants summary judgment on the city employees' claims of breach of contract and unconstitutional impairment of contract regarding an ordinance increasing their pension plan contribution rate because the Georgia General Assembly expressly contemplated that a municipal corporation's provision for employee retirement or pension benefits would be subject to being supplemented by local law. Borders v. City of Atlanta, 298 Ga. 188, 779 S.E.2d 279 (2015).
No notice required prior to council's consideration of participation in retirement system.
- City council is not required by statute to advertise notice of the council's intent to consider an ordinance extending participation in the Joint Municipal Employees Retirement System pension to the council's own members. City of Marietta v. Holland, 252 Ga. 299, 314 S.E.2d 97 (1984); Swann v. Board of Trustees, 257 Ga. 450, 360 S.E.2d 395 (1987).
Cited in King v. Herron, 241 Ga. 5, 243 S.E.2d 36 (1978).
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERALPolicy behind subsection (a) is to impose restrictions upon the powers of members of municipal governing authorities to increase their own salaries or compensation. 1980 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U80-27.
Subsection (a) does not prohibit increase from applying to whole council after next election when that election involves less than all positions on the governing authority. 1980 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U80-27.
City may set up retirement system for city employees without necessity of amending city charter. 1970 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U70-80.
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 185, 202 et seq., 221 et seq., 226. 63C Am. Jur. 2d, Public Officers and Employees, §§ 268 et seq., 279, 284.
Wrongful Termination of Retirement Benefits, 13 POF2d 531.
C.J.S.- 62 C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, § 473 et seq.