"I AGREE TO RECEIVE ALL MAILINGS AND COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONICALLY. SUCH ELECTRONIC MAILING OR COMMUNICATIONS MAY EVEN INCLUDE CANCELLATION OR NONRENEWAL NOTICES";
provided, however, that the Commissioner may approve the use of substantially similar language;
(Code 1933, § 56-2421, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1; Ga. L. 2014, p. 829, § 4/HB 645; Ga. L. 2017, p. 774, § 33/HB 323; Ga. L. 2020, p. 493, § 33/SB 429.)
The 2020 amendment, effective July 29, 2020, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, substituted "email" for "e-mail" in paragraph (d)(4).
Code Commission notes.- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2014, "apply" was substituted for "applies" in subsection (c).
For application of this statute in 2020, see Executive Orders 06.11.20.01, 06.29.20.02, 07.15.20.01, 07.31.20.02, 08.15.20.01, and 08.31.20.02.
A listing of Executive Orders issued in 2020 can be found at https://gov.georgia.gov/executive-action/executive-orders/2020-executive-orders.
Law reviews.- For annual survey on insurance law, see 66 Mercer L. Rev. 93 (2014).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Editor's notes.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Civil Code 1910, § 2470, and former Code 1933, § 56-801, repealed by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, enacting this title, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Delivery in reasonable time is included in every insurance contract.
- Every contract for insurance includes, in addition to the requirements of reasonable risk imposed by the insurer prior to issuance of the contract, payment of the requisite premium by the insured, and issuance of the policy by the insurer, the additional act of delivery of the policy of insurance to the insured or other person entitled thereto within a reasonable period of time. Matthews v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co., 141 Ga. App. 368, 233 S.E.2d 442 (1977).
Receipt by agent to deliver is delivery to insured.
- Receipt by an agent from the agent's insurance company of a policy to be unconditionally delivered by the agent to the applicant is, in law, tantamount to a delivery to the insured, although the agent never parts with possession of the policy, and although the policy's delivery to the applicant is by contract made essential to the policy's validity. Southern Life Ins. Co. v. Kempton, 56 Ga. 339 (1876) (decided under former law); Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Pekor, 106 Ga. 1, 31 S.E. 779 (1898); Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 20 Ga. App. 706, 93 S.E. 299 (1917) (decided under former law);(decided under former Civil Code 1910, § 2470).
Manual delivery of the policy is not necessary when the policy had been issued by the company and simply retained by the agent for the agent's individual protection until reimbursed by the insured. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 20 Ga. App. 706, 93 S.E. 299 (1917), later appeal, 23 Ga. App. 421, 98 S.E. 399 (1919), later appeal, 25 Ga. App. 125, 103 S.E. 424 (1920) (decided under former Civil Code 1910, § 2470).
Delivery is not necessary to make contract effective.
- While a policy of insurance is required to be in writing, delivery is not necessary if, in other respects the contract is consummated. Home Ins. Co. v. Head, 35 Ga. App. 143, 132 S.E. 238 (1926), later appeal, 36 Ga. App. 379, 138 S.E. 275 (1927) (decided under former Civil Code 1910, § 2470); South Ga. Farmers Fire Ins. Ass'n v. Smith, 46 Ga. App. 12, 166 S.E. 423 (1932);(decided under former Civil Code 1910, § 2470).
If consideration paid, although risk has been increased.
- When the contract of insurance has been agreed upon by the insurance company and insured has paid the consideration therefor, it is a good contract, a valid policy, whether the policy was delivered to the insured or was still in the hands of the agent. The insured is entitled to the policy and the agent had no right in law to withhold it. The knowledge of the agent that the insured had violated one of the conditions of the policy by increasing the risk of the company would not authorize the agent to refuse to deliver the policy upon the insured's demand. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Boswell, 20 Ga. App. 446, 93 S.E. 95 (1917) (decided under former Civil Code 1910, § 2470).
Unless policy requires delivery.
- When an insurance company has accepted an application for insurance and has issued the policy, actual delivery is not essential to the consummation of a contract of insurance, unless expressly provided for in the application or the policy. When both the application and the policy are silent as respects actual delivery of the policy being essential to a consummation of the contract, the contract becomes consummated upon the retention by the company of the notes and the issuance of the policy and mailing the policy to the company's local agent for delivery to the applicant. Tarver v. Swann, 36 Ga. App. 461, 137 S.E. 126 (1927) (decided under former Civil Code 1910, § 2470).
Parol agreement requiring actual delivery for consummation held ineffective.
- When an application for insurance, which, upon the consummation of the contract of insurance, became a part of the contract, provided that the company should "not be bound by any act done or statement made by or to any agent, or other person, which is not contained in this application," an agreement not contained in the application or the policy, made between the applicant and the local agent, when the application and notes were signed, to the effect that the contract of insurance would not be consummated until actual delivery of the policy to the applicant, and that upon failure to make such actual delivery the applicant would not be bound upon the notes, did not become part of the contract. Tarver v. Swann, 36 Ga. App. 461, 137 S.E. 126 (1927) (decided under former Civil Code 1910, § 2470).
Insurance contracts are considered made at the contract's place of delivery. Canal Ins. Co. v. Aldrich, 489 F. Supp. 157 (S.D. Ga. 1980).
Burden of proving custom as to consummating renewals.
- When a contract of insurance is not delivered, an agent whose duty it is to keep the property of the agent's principal insured is under obligation to see that, in other respects, the contract is consummated, and on being sued for a breach of duty, the burden of proving that it was in fact consummated is on the agent. If one seeks to show this by evidence of a local custom whereby it was the practice of insurance companies to renew any policy about to expire by sending out a new policy shortly before the expiration of the former one and presenting a bill for the premium within a month or two after such expiration, the burden is on the agent to establish that this custom was complied with in the particular instance. Thomas v. Funkhouser, 91 Ga. 478, 18 S.E. 312 (1893) (decided under former Code 1882, § 2794).
When the insured had prior knowledge, the insurance company could rely on an exclusion contained in the policy, even though the policy was not delivered until after the loss occurred. Williams v. Fallaize Ins. Agency, Inc., 220 Ga. App. 411, 469 S.E.2d 752 (1996).
Motorist's parent's deletion of the motorist's vehicle from the parent's insurance policy was properly relied on by an insurer in the insurer's denial of coverage of a driver, arising from a motor vehicle collision with the motorist, although the insurer failed to prove that the insurer provided the parent with a written copy of the endorsement within a reasonable period of time of the issuance thereof, as required by O.C.G.A. § 33-24-14, as the parent had notice of the endorsement because the motorist made the request to change the policy coverage; the decrease in premium was consideration for deletion of the coverage. Danforth v. Gov't Emples. Ins. Co., 282 Ga. App. 421, 638 S.E.2d 852 (2006), cert. denied, No. S07C0473, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 143 (Ga. 2007).
Cited in Broome v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 119 Ga. App. 443, 167 S.E.2d 607 (1969).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 43 Am. Jur. 2d, Insurance, § 227 et seq.
C.J.S.- 44 C.J.S., Insurance, §§ 497, 498.
ALR.
- Date from which life insurance premium periods are to be computed, 32 A.L.R. 1253; 80 A.L.R. 957; 111 A.L.R. 1420; 169 A.L.R. 290.
What amounts to a "delivery" or an "actual delivery" to insured within express provision of insurance policy, 53 A.L.R. 492; 145 A.L.R. 1434.
Right of insurer to show that delivery of policy was conditional, 95 A.L.R. 472.
Constructive delivery of policy ready for delivery to insured upon compliance with certain conditions which he agreed to perform but had not performed prior to the loss, 123 A.L.R. 907.
Rights and remedies arising out of delay in passing upon application for insurance, 32 A.L.R.2d 487.
Transmission of insurance policy to insurance agent as satisfying provision requiring delivery to insured, 19 A.L.R.3d 953.
Insurer's duty, and effect of its failure, to provide insured or payee with copy of policy or other adequate documentation of its terms, 78 A.L.R.4th 9.