Every hospital authority shall be deemed to exercise public and essential governmental functions and shall have all the powers necessary or convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of this article, including, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following powers:
(Ga. L. 1941, p. 241, § 5; Ga. L. 1945, p. 349, § 1; Ga. L. 1957, p. 116, § 1; Code 1933, § 88-1805, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, p. 499, § 1; Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess., p. 15, § 1; Ga. L. 1969, p. 103, § 2; Ga. L. 1969, p. 805, § 1; Ga. L. 1978, p. 1970, § 1; Ga. L. 1980, p. 1140, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 712, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 1983, p. 3, § 22; Ga. L. 1983, p. 1566, § 2; Ga. L. 1990, p. 310, § 1; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1391, § 3; Ga. L. 1995, p. 901, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 296, § 24; Ga. L. 2003, p. 569, § 2.)
Cross references.- Certificate of need required for offering of health care facilities and services, § 31-6-40.
Code Commission notes.- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2001, "not for profit" was substituted for "not-for-profit" in paragraph (25).
Law reviews.- For survey article on local government law, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 225 (1982). For annual survey of local government law, see 35 Mercer L. Rev. 233 (1983).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Hospital authorities have unlimited and unqualified right to sue and be sued, just as any private corporation. Hipp v. Hospital Auth., 104 Ga. App. 174, 121 S.E.2d 273 (1961).
Hospital authorities are subject to suits for negligently inflicted injuries.
- Phrase to sue and be sued subjects a hospital authority corporation to suits for damages for personal injuries the hospital negligently inflicts on one of the hospital's patients. Hospital Auth. v. Shubert, 96 Ga. App. 222, 99 S.E.2d 708 (1957).
Hospital authorities not entitled to sovereign immunity.
- Hospital authorities, because the authorities are neither the state nor a department or agency of the state, are not entitled to the defense of sovereign immunity. Thomas v. Hospital Auth., 264 Ga. 40, 440 S.E.2d 195 (1994); Randolph County Hosp. Auth. v. Johnson, 215 Ga. App. 283, 450 S.E.2d 318 (1994).
Attack by authority upon state statute on state constitutional grounds.
- Hospital authority has standing by statute to attack state law on grounds that the law violates due process and equal protection clauses of Georgia Constitution. Caldwell v. Hospital Auth., 248 Ga. 887, 287 S.E.2d 15 (1982).
Paragraph (1) not construed as waiver of sovereign immunity.
- Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. II, Para. IX does not require courts to construe the "sue and be sued" language of paragraph (1) of O.C.G.A. § 31-7-75 as a waiver of sovereign immunity. Howard v. Liberty Mem. Hosp., 752 F. Supp. 1074 (S.D. Ga. 1990).
State action immunity.
- Hospital authority was an instrumentality, agency, or "political subdivision" of the state for purposes of the state action immunity doctrine and, thus, was immune from an antitrust action brought by a doctor who was denied staff privileges. Crosby v. Hospital Auth., 93 F.3d 1515 (11th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116, 117 S. Ct. 1246, 137 L. Ed. 2d 328 (1997).
In O.C.G.A. §§ 31-7-71 and31-7-75, the Georgia legislature authorized hospital authorities (HA) power to acquire and lease hospitals to others, and must have anticipated that HA's could reduce competition, so state-action immunity applied to defendant HA's acquisition of a second hospital and the HA's lease to another defendant, an entity the HA created, and plaintiff Federal Trade Commission's complaint under 15 U.S.C. § 18 properly failed. FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health Sys., 663 F.3d 1369 (11th Cir. 2011)(Unpublished).
Hospital was entitled to sovereign immunity for any judgment in a medical malpractice action in excess of the hospital's liability insurance. Howard v. Liberty Mem. Hosp., 752 F. Supp. 1074 (S.D. Ga. 1990).
Discharge of governmental obligation to provide for health of people.
- Under the Hospital Authorities Law, the governmental obligation to provide for the health of people can be discharged by acquisition of existing hospital facilities, by construction of completely new hospitals, and by sale or lease of hospital to others (as well as by the hospital authority's operation thereof). Bradfield v. Hospital Auth., 226 Ga. 575, 176 S.E.2d 92 (1970).
Suitable private corporation could properly operate a hospital, either as lessee or as owner, so as to promote the public health functions of government. Richmond County Hosp. Auth. v. Richmond County, 255 Ga. 183, 336 S.E.2d 562 (1985).
Hospitals are intended to discharge identical governmental obligation.
- Hospitals, whether owned directly by a county or city, or by an authority, are designed and intended to serve identical purposes of discharging the governmental obligation to provide for the health of the people. Bradfield v. Hospital Auth., 226 Ga. 575, 176 S.E.2d 92 (1970).
Lease between related corporations.
- Since corporations are separate and distinct entities in the eyes of the law, notwithstanding even common ownership of two corporations and the relationship of one corporation as the wholly-owned subsidiary of another, the requirement that there be a lease to others is fully satisfied by a lease between two such related corporations. Richmond County Hosp. Auth. v. Richmond County, 255 Ga. 183, 336 S.E.2d 562 (1985).
Funding of project not for purely charitable purpose not unconstitutional.
- Even assuming a purely charitable purpose is not involved in a project, the project's funding by a hospital authority does not violate Ga. Const. 1976, Art. IX, Sec. IV, Para. III (see now Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. II, Para. VIII), because a hospital authority is not a county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision of this state. Bradfield v. Hospital Auth., 226 Ga. 575, 176 S.E.2d 92 (1970).
Language of O.C.G.A. § 31-7-75 does not require an "investment"; the language simply indicates that if an investment is made in connection with a lease, the rate of return will be limited to that which is reasonable. Richmond County Hosp. Auth. v. Richmond County, 255 Ga. 183, 336 S.E.2d 562 (1985).
Cash and accounts receivable are "personal property" under paragraph (14) of O.C.G.A. § 31-7-75. Richmond County Hosp. Auth. v. Richmond County, 255 Ga. 183, 336 S.E.2d 562 (1985).
Hospital authority members' action on corporations' boards did not breach their fiduciary duties or create a conflict of interest. Richmond County Hosp. Auth. v. Richmond County, 255 Ga. 183, 336 S.E.2d 562 (1985).
Hospital authority was engaging in ultra vires activity by renting and selling durable medical equipment to general public since there is no legislative authorization for such activity. Tift County Hosp. Auth. v. MRS of Tifton, Ga., Inc., 255 Ga. 164, 335 S.E.2d 546 (1985).
Limitation on delegation of functions of hospital authority.
- Hospital authority did not have the statutory authority to create a trust and delegate to the trust the power and discretion to carry out the authority's functions, missions, and responsibilities. Kendall v. Griffin-Spalding County Hosp. Auth., 242 Ga. App. 821, 531 S.E.2d 396 (2000).
Liability for punitive damages.
- Under appropriate circumstances, a hospital authority may be held liable for punitive damages. Hodges v. Effingham County Hosp. Auth., 182 Ga. App. 173, 355 S.E.2d 104 (1987).
Requirement that physician use hospital facilities and services is valid.
- Hospital authority's resolution requiring a physician to use in-house facilities and services for hospital patients, where offered, does not invade a physician's province. Although the physician is required to use the facilities and equipment provided within the hospital complex for testing rather than similar facilities and equipment outside, the physician is nevertheless free to interpret the results of such tests and free to diagnose and prescribe treatment for all the physician's patients. Cobb County-Kennestone Hosp. Auth. v. Prince, 242 Ga. 139, 249 S.E.2d 581 (1978).
Hospital authority did not violate Clayton Act.- Whether the hospital authority authorized the purchase of the hospital without considering, among other factors, the anticompetitive adverse effect of the acquisition on healthcare in the community and alternatives to leasing the hospital to the defendants were irrelevant. The state put the ultimate say-so for the provision and management of healthcare in the hands of the healthcare authorities. FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health Sys., 793 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (M.D. Ga. 2011), aff'd, 663 F.3d 1369 (11th Cir. 2011).
Private corporation's records were public.
- Private corporation's operation of a hospital and other facilities leased from a county hospital authority under O.C.G.A. § 31-7-75(7) was a service it performed "on behalf of" a county agency, so records related to that operation were public records under O.C.G.A. § 50-18-70(b)(2) of the Open Records Act, O.C.G.A. § 50-18-70 et seq.; whether other records were public required a factual determination as to how closely the records were related to this operation. Smith v. Northside Hosp., Inc., 302 Ga. 517, 807 S.E.2d 909 (2017).
Cited in Griffin-Spalding County Hosp. Auth. v. Radio Station WKEU, 240 Ga. 444, 241 S.E.2d 196 (1978); Cox Enters., Inc. v. Carroll City/County Hosp. Auth., 247 Ga. 39, 273 S.E.2d 841 (1981); Medical Ctr. Hosp. Auth. v. Andrews, 162 Ga. App. 687, 292 S.E.2d 197 (1982); United States v. Wingo, 723 F. Supp. 798 (N.D. Ga. 1989); Colquitt County Hosp. Auth. v. Health Star, Inc., 262 Ga. 285, 417 S.E.2d 147 (1992); United States v. Hosp. Auth. of Charlton County (In re Hosp. Auth. of Charlton County), 56 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 220 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. July 3, 2012).
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERALCounty hospital authority is authorized to make term loans. 1969 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 69-9.
Hospital authority can lease unimproved land to third party subject to prohibition against gratuities contained in Ga. Const. 1976, Art. III, Sec. VIII, Para. XII (see now Ga. Const. 1983, Art. III, Sec. VI, Para. VI). 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 71-190.
Authority's right to operate and charge for ambulance service.- Hospital authority has right to operate ambulance service for transportation of patients to and from the authority's hospital and may make charges for such service. 1965-66 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 66-176.
Authority may contract with private ambulance service for back-up service.- Hospital authority may enter into contract with private ambulance service, on trip by trip basis, to provide for back-up ambulance service for the authority. 1970 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 70-200.
Agreement to subsidize hospital authority ambulance service not violative of state Constitution.- Agreement by county with hospital authority in nature of contract in which county agrees to subsidize ambulance service operated by hospital authority does not violate any provisions of state Constitution and county would be authorized to pay sums of money to hospital authority for this service. 1968 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 68-280.
Unemployment compensation coverage for authority employees.- Inasmuch as creation and continued operation of a hospital authority is a joint venture of a hospital authority and the authority's supporting political subdivision or subdivisions, a determination as to whether the hospital authority's employees will be covered by unemployment compensation should be a joint determination made by both the hospital authority and the supporting political subdivision or subdivisions. 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 71-55.
Open meetings and records provisions apply to hospital authorities.- Provisions for open meetings and records apply to hospital authorities. 1980 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U80-6.
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 40A Am. Jur. 2d, Hospitals and Asylums, § 8 et seq.
C.J.S.- 41 C.J.S., Hospitals, § 12 et seq.
ALR.- Hospital's liability for personal injury or death of doctor, nurse, or attendant, 1 A.L.R.3d 1036.