(Code 1981, §31-6-21, enacted by Ga. L. 1983, p. 1566, § 1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 31; Ga. L. 1985, p. 829, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 6, § 31; Ga. L. 1994, p. 684, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 296, §§ 6, 22; Ga. L. 2007, p. 173, § 2C/HB 429; Ga. L. 2008, p. 12, § 1-1/SB 433; Ga. L. 2009, p. 8, § 31/SB 46; Ga. L. 2009, p. 453, § 1-8/HB 228; Ga. L. 2019, p. 148, § 1-3/HB 186; Ga. L. 2019, p. 945, § 2/HB 300.)
The 2019 amendments. The first 2019 amendment, effective July 1, 2019, added "with recommendations from technical advisory committees" at the end of paragraph (b)(2); substituted "technical advisory committees" for "the Health Strategies Council" in paragraph (b)(3); inserted ", other determinations," in paragraph (b)(5); inserted "care" near the end of the first sentence of paragraph (b)(8); added the proviso at the end of paragraph (b)(9); deleted "and" at the end of paragraph (b)(10); substituted "; and" for a period at the end of paragraph (b)(11); and added paragraph (b)(12) and subsection (c). The second 2019 amendment, effective July 1, 2019, substituted "life plan" for "continuing care retirement" near the end of the last sentence of paragraph (b)(8).
Editor's notes.- Ga. L. 2008, p. 12, § 3-1/SB 433, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment to this Code section shall only apply to applications submitted on or after July 1, 2008.
U.S. Code.- Section 1122 of the federal Social Security Act of 1935, as amended, referred to in paragraph (11), is codified as 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-1.
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Criteria used by Review Board.
- Review Board could use not only the considerations listed in O.C.G.A. § 31-6-42, but also Health Planning Agency standards and criteria interpreting those standards, to make a decision in the case before the board. North Fulton Community Hosp. v. State Health Planning & Dev. Agency, 168 Ga. App. 801, 310 S.E.2d 764 (1983).
Reversal of the agency and denial of a Certificate of Need (CON) was affirmed because the atypical barrier exception did not support the agency's grant of the CON as the agency's interpretation of the atypical barrier exception in the rule was inconsistent with the plain language of the rule, clearly erroneous, and prejudiced the substantial rights of the challenging hospitals who already provided the same services. ASMC, LLC v. Northside Hosp., Inc., 344 Ga. App. 576, 810 S.E.2d 663 (2018), cert. denied, 2018 Ga. LEXIS 610 (Ga. 2018).
Interpretation of statute exceeded department's authority.
- Department of Community Health's (DCH) decision to treat a hospital's comprehensive in-patient rehabilitation (CIPR) program as a healthcare facility that was being relocated under O.C.G.A. § 31-6-47(a)(24) violated the certificate of need statute and therefore exceeded DCH's authority under O.C.G.A. § 31-6-21. Dep't of Cmty. Health v. Emory Univ., 351 Ga. App. 257, 830 S.E.2d 628 (2019), cert. denied, No. S19C1532, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 157 (Ga. 2020).
Rule 272-2-.09(13) construed.
- Cardiac Surgery Rule, Rule 272-2-.09(13), promulgated pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 31-6-21, does not place a two-year moratorium on applications for adult cardiac surgery services and pediatric cardiac catheterization and surgical services, but merely requires that the applicant show need. Chatham County Hosp. Auth. & Mem. Medical Center, Inc. v. St. Joseph's Hosp., 178 Ga. App. 628, 344 S.E.2d 463 (1986).
Addition of beds to adult psychiatric facility required certificate of need.
- Trial court erred in denying the challenger's petition for review because the agency's final decision holding that the hospital was not required to obtain a Certificate of Need (CON) before the hopsital increased the hospital's available beds was inconsistent with the plain language of O.C.G.A. § 31-6-40(a) and Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. 111-2-2-.26(a), which explicitly required CON prior to the expansion of an existing acute care adult psychiatric and/or substance abuse inpatient program. UHS of Anchor, L.P. v. Dep't of Cmty. Health, 351 Ga. App. 29, 830 S.E.2d 413 (2019).
Criteria met for general need for new hospital.- In an action concerning the grant of a Certificate of Need, the appellant's challenge to the Georgia Department of Community Health's determination that a medical center met the general need requirements for a new hospital failed because the Department found a need for the proposed hospital based on rising population, general growth in the area, and increased emergency room usage at nearby hospitals. Doctors Hosp. of Augusta v. Ga. Dep't of Cmty. Health, Ga. App. , S.E.2d (Aug. 20, 2020).
Cited in Ga. Dep't of Cmty. Health, Div. of Health Planning v. Gwinnett Hosp. Sys., 262 Ga. App. 879, 586 S.E.2d 762 (2003).