Each health care provider and each other person with whom a health care agent interacts under an advance directive for health care shall be subject to the following duties and responsibilities:
(Code 1981, §31-32-8, enacted by Ga. L. 2007, p. 133, § 2/HB 24; Ga. L. 2008, p. 503, § 4/SB 405.)
Law reviews.- For note, "An Advance Directive: The Elective, Effective Way to be Protective of Your Rights," see 68 Mercer L. Rev. 521 (2017).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Editor's notes.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code Section 31-36-7, which was subsequently repealed but was succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Notice of limitation.
- Since the health care agents did not notify defendant physician of a power of attorney and its proscription against surgery, and the document was not in the patient's hospital chart, the physician could not be held liable for battery for performing an operation. Roberts v. Jones, 222 Ga. App. 548, 475 S.E.2d 193 (1996) (decided under former Code Section31-36-7).
Right to administer treatment for pain.
- Even though a patient executed a power of attorney containing a limitation on "painful" surgery, the patient's physician had the duty to perform an operation to alleviate the patient's undoubted pain and suffering. Roberts v. Jones, 222 Ga. App. 548, 475 S.E.2d 193 (1996) (decided under former Code Section31-36-7).
Genuine issues of material fact as to whether medical defendants made a good faith effort.
- Trial court properly denied summary judgment to the medical defendants on the immunity question under the Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care Act, O.C.G.A. § 31-32-1 et seq., specifically O.C.G.A. § 31-32-10(a)(2), because genuine issues of material fact existed regarding whether the defendants made a good faith effort to rely on the directions and decisions of the patient's health care agent under the Advance Directive in carrying out the March 7 intubation. Doctors Hosp. of Augusta, LLC v. Alicea, 332 Ga. App. 529, 774 S.E.2d 114 (2015), aff'd, 299 Ga. 315, 788 S.E.2d 392 (2016).
Under advanced directive, will of patient or patient's agent controls.
- Under the Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care Act, O.C.G.A. § 31-32-1 et seq., it is the will of the patient or the patient's designated health care agent, rather than the will of the health care provider, that controls; and O.C.G.A. § 31-32-8(1) enforces that purpose by declaring that a health care provider who believes a declarant is unable to understand the general nature of the health care procedure which the provider deems necessary shall consult with any available health care agent known to the health care provider who then has power to act for the declarant under an advance directive for health care. Doctors Hospital of Augusta, LLC v. Alicea, 299 Ga. 315, 788 S.E.2d 392 (2016).
No immunity for health care provider.
- After the designated health care agent sued a hospital and a doctor for intubating and putting the agent's grandmother on a mechanical ventilator, contrary to the grandmother's advance directive for health care, the trial court properly rejected the doctor's immunity argument under the Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care Act, O.C.G.A. § 31-32-1 et seq., and properly denied summary judgment on that ground because there was a clear factual dispute about whether the doctor relied at all on any directive from the agent in acting to order the intubation; and there was apparently undisputed evidence that the doctor did not tell the agent that the doctor was unwilling to comply with the agent's decision, or promptly inform the agent of the doctor's decision. Doctors Hospital of Augusta, LLC v. Alicea, 299 Ga. 315, 788 S.E.2d 392 (2016).