Introduction of Bills Having Significant Impact Upon Anticipated Revenues or Expenditures; Furnishing of Fiscal Notes

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

    1. Any bill having a significant impact on the anticipated revenue or expenditure level of any state department, bureau, board, council, committee, commission, or other state agency must be introduced no later than the twentieth day of any session. The sponsor of such legislation must request a fiscal note from the Office of Planning and Budget and the Department of Audits and Accounts by November 1 of the year preceding the annual convening of the General Assembly in which the bill is to be introduced, but subsequent to the preparation of such bill by the Office of Legislative Counsel. With respect to a member-elect of the General Assembly, such person must request a fiscal note from the Office of Planning and Budget and the Department of Audits and Accounts by December 1 of the year preceding the annual convening of the General Assembly in which the bill is to be introduced, but subsequent to the preparation of such bill by the Office of Legislative Counsel. The director of the Office of Planning and Budget and the state auditor shall prepare and submit the fiscal note not later than the day of convening of the General Assembly.
    2. The failure to request a fiscal note by November 1 as provided in paragraph (1) of this subsection shall preclude consideration of the measure by the Senate or the House of Representatives unless the committee to which a bill is assigned in the chamber in which it is introduced:
        1. Determines that such bill will have a significant impact as described in paragraph (1) of this subsection;
        2. Waives the applicable November 1 or December 1 deadline of paragraph (1) of this subsection;
        3. Requests a fiscal note from the director of the Office of Planning and Budget and the state auditor, except as otherwise provided in subsection (e) of this Code section; and
        4. Among fiscal notes so requested, the chairperson of such committee suggests a preferred order of completion to guide the director of the Office of Planning and Budget and the state auditor; or
      1. Determines that such bill will not have a significant impact as described in paragraph (1) of this subsection.
    3. Any such determination or waiver shall be by the affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the committee, on a specific motion for waiver, and shall allow consideration of the measure by both chambers so long as the bill has been introduced not later than the twentieth day of any session.
    4. Any general bill having a significant impact on the anticipated revenue or expenditure level of counties and municipalities must be introduced no later than the twentieth day of any session.
    5. This article shall not apply to any local bill affecting a county or municipality which must be advertised in accordance with the requirements of Code Section 28-1-14, relating to the advertisement of local legislation.
  1. In the event any bill having a significant impact as described in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of this Code section is introduced after the twentieth day of any session, it shall not be considered or acted upon in any manner by either the Senate or the House of Representatives. The President of the Senate shall decide whether a bill which is introduced in the Senate falls within this category; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall decide whether a bill which is introduced in the House of Representatives falls within this category. The President of the Senate shall have the same right of decision on House bills which reach the Senate; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall have the same right of decision on Senate bills which reach the House of Representatives.
    1. In the event a bill having a significant impact as described in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of this Code section is introduced not later than the twentieth day of any session, the chairperson of the committee to which such bill is referred shall request the director of the Office of Planning and Budget and the state auditor to submit any such fiscal note as to the fiscal effect of any such bill and to file a copy of such fiscal note with the Senate Budget and Evaluation Office and the House Budget and Research Office. The chairperson shall make such request after the bill is referred to the committee.
    2. The chairperson shall not be required to make such request with respect to any bill for which:
      1. A fiscal note has been requested by the sponsor of the bill pursuant to paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of this Code section and the chairperson has been duly notified in writing of such request by such sponsor; or
      2. The director of the Office of Planning and Budget and the state auditor have previously submitted a fiscal note pursuant to a request under paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of this Code section.
  2. In the event a determination is made under subparagraph (a)(2)(B) of this Code section that a bill will not have a significant impact, if the director of the Office of Planning and Budget or the state auditor has information or knowledge that any bill will have a significant impact as described in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of this Code section, a fiscal note may be prepared according to the criteria outlined in subsection (g) of this Code section. Such a fiscal note may be prepared without a request by the bill's author or the committees to which it is assigned in either chamber. Any fiscal note prepared according to this subsection shall be distributed consistent with Code Section 28-5-44.
  3. During any regular session of the General Assembly, the director of the Office of Planning and Budget and the state auditor shall prepare and submit the fiscal note within five days after receipt of the request or within ten days if the director of the Office of Planning and Budget and the state auditor have made a formal request for extension of time.
  4. The principal administrative and fiscal officers of all departments, boards, councils, committees, commissions, and other agencies of the state government and, when applicable, of counties, municipalities, and other political subdivisions are authorized and directed to cooperate fully with the director of the Office of Planning and Budget and the state auditor in providing any information and assistance necessary in the preparation of fiscal notes pursuant to this Code section.
    1. The fiscal note required by this Code section shall include a reliable estimate in dollars of the anticipated change in revenue or expenditures under the provisions of the bill. It shall also include a statement as to the immediate effect and, if determinable or reasonably foreseeable, the long-range effect of the measure. If, after careful investigation, it is determined that no dollar estimate is possible, the fiscal note shall contain a statement to that effect, setting forth the reasons why no dollar estimate can be given. In this event, the fiscal note shall contain an example based on a specific situation or reflecting the average group of persons possibly affected by the bill so as to provide an indication of the cost of such bill to the General Assembly. Assumptions used to develop these averages shall be noted in the fiscal note and the criteria included herein shall constitute a fiscal note. No comment or opinion regarding the merits of the measure for which the statement is prepared shall be included in the fiscal note; however, technical or mechanical defects may be noted. The state auditor and the director of the Office of Planning and Budget shall jointly prepare their fiscal note; and, if there is a difference of opinion between such officials, it shall be noted in the fiscal note. In the event the director of the Office of Planning and Budget and the state auditor concur that the fiscal note on any such bill cannot be prepared within the five-day limitation in effect during any regular session of the General Assembly, they shall so inform the chairperson in writing and shall be allowed to submit said note not later than ten days after the request for it is made.
    2. For fiscal note requests for a bill having a significant impact on the anticipated revenue or expenditure level of the Department of Education which would create a new program or funding category, the fiscal note shall include a ten-year projection of the costs of such new program or funding category.

(Ga. L. 1975, p. 1568, § 3; Ga. L. 1976, p. 533, § 1; Ga. L. 1978, p. 907, § 1; Ga. L. 1981, p. 1809, § 11; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1116, § 1; Ga. L. 1983, p. 3, § 54; Ga. L. 1985, p. 1331, §§ 2, 3; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1914, § 19; Ga. L. 1994, p. 97, § 28; Ga. L. 1994, p. 1633, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 761, § 1; Ga. L. 2008, p. VO1, § 1-15/HB 529; Ga. L. 2012, p. 859, § 1/HB 1178; Ga. L. 2014, p. 866, § 28/SB 340.)

Cross references.

- Fiscal note for fiscal impact on local political subdivisions, § 28-5-49. Fiscal note for bills impacting employees' health insurance plans, § 45-18-20.

Editor's notes.

- Ga. L. 1993, p. 1914, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Budget Accountability and Planning Act of 1993'. "

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Fiscal note to be attached to bill but need not be attached to enrolled Act.

- Although Ga. L. 1966, p. 573, as amended by Ga. L. 1969, p. 570 (see now O.C.G.A. § 28-5-42) requires that the chairman of the committee to which a retirement or pension bill is referred procure a fiscal note as to the effect of such bill and Ga. L. 1969, p. 570 (see now O.C.G.A. § 28-5-44) requires the committee chairman to attach the fiscal note to the bill and to furnish and read said note to the members of the respective houses of the General Assembly, neither of these laws require that the fiscal note be attached to the enrolled Act. The Supreme Court declined to construe Ga. L. 1969, p. 570 (see now O.C.G.A. § 28-5-44) so as to require the fiscal note to be attached to the enrolled Act and to enforce that Ga. L. 1969, p. 570 (see now O.C.G.A. § 28-5-22) as thus construed as if it were a constitutional mandate. Richmond County v. Pierce, 234 Ga. 274, 215 S.E.2d 655 (1975).

Validity of amendment passed in violation of time limit.

- The 1987 amendment to O.C.G.A. § 49-4-6, relating to the computation of eligibility of persons for public assistance, was presumed valid notwithstanding a contention that it was passed in violation of the time limitation prescribed in O.C.G.A. § 28-5-42(a). Wilson v. Ledbetter, 194 Ga. App. 32, 389 S.E.2d 771 (1989), rev'd on other grounds, 260 Ga. 180, 390 S.E.2d 846 (1990).

Judicial examination of legislative procedure.

- Generally, the courts will not question the procedure used by the General Assembly in enacting legislation. Wilson v. Ledbetter, 194 Ga. App. 32, 389 S.E.2d 771 (1989), rev'd on other grounds, 260 Ga. 180, 390 S.E.2d 846 (1990).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 73 Am. Jur. 2d, Statutes, §§ 112 et seq., 131 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 82 C.J.S., Statutes, § 28.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.