Original or Subsequent Voidness of Writing

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

Parol evidence shall be admissible to show that a writing either was originally void or subsequently became void.

(Code 1981, §24-3-8, enacted by Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, § 2/HB 24.)

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 29A Am. Jur. 2d, Evidence, § 1119 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 32A C.J.S., Evidence, §§ 1207, 1221, 1224 et seq., 1234 et seq.

ALR.

- Parol evidence rule; right to show fraud in inducement or execution of written contract, 56 A.L.R. 13.

"Contractual" consideration as regards parol evidence rule, 100 A.L.R. 17.

Parol evidence rule as applied to lease, 151 A.L.R. 279.

Election by beneficiary to take under or against will as predictable upon initiation of, or participation in, court proceedings, 166 A.L.R. 316.

Admissibility of declarations by testator on issue of revocation of will, 172 A.L.R. 354.

Failure to object to parol evidence, or voluntary introduction thereof, as waiver of defense of statute of frauds, 15 A.L.R.2d 1330.

Admissibility of oral evidence to show that a writing was a sham agreement not intended to create legal relations, 71 A.L.R.2d 382.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.