When Commercial Feed Deemed Misbranded

  1. Law
  2. Georgia Code
  3. Agriculture
  4. Commercial Feeds
  5. When Commercial Feed Deemed Misbranded

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

A commercial feed shall be deemed to be misbranded:

  1. If its labeling is false or misleading in any particular;
  2. If it is distributed under the name of another commercial feed;
  3. If it is not labeled as required in Code Section 2-13-8;
  4. If it purports to be or is represented as a commercial feed or if it purports to contain or is represented as containing a commercial feed ingredient, unless such commercial feed or feed ingredient conforms to the definition, if any, prescribed by regulation by the Commissioner; or
  5. If any word, statement, or other information required by or under the authority of this chapter to appear on the label or labeling is not prominently placed thereon with such conspicuousness (as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices in the labeling) and in such terms as to render it likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary conditions of purchase and use.

(Code 1933, § 42-205, enacted by Ga. L. 1972, p. 10, § 1.)

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 35 Am. Jur. 2d, Food, § 24 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 36A C.J.S., Food, §§ 38, 39, 44, 45.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.