(Code 1981, §19-9-7, enacted by Ga. L. 1995, p. 863, § 7; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1435, § 2; Ga. L. 2007, p. 554, § 5/HB 369.)
Editor's notes.- Ga. L. 2002, p. 1435, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Georgia's Family Violence Intervention Program Certification Act."'
Ga. L. 2007, p. 554, § 1/HB 369, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "The General Assembly of Georgia declares that it is the policy of this state to assure that minor children have frequent and continuing contact with parents who have shown the ability to act in the best interests of their children and to encourage parents to share in the rights and responsibilities of rearing their children after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage or relationship."
Ga. L. 2007, p. 554, § 8/HB 369, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the 2007 amendment shall apply to all child custody proceedings and modifications of child custody filed on or after January 1, 2008.
Law reviews.- For note on the 2002 amendment of this Code section, see 19 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 142 (2002).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Failure to incorporate parenting plan.
- Trial court erred in failing to incorporate a parenting plan in the court's final judgment and decree. Williams v. Williams, 301 Ga. 218, 800 S.E.2d 282 (2017).
Ordered supervised visitation not an abuse of discretion.
- Trial court did not abuse the court's discretion by ordering the father to have supervised visitation because there was evidence of several prior instances of family violence by the father that enabled the trial court to determine, in the court's discretion, that supervised overnight visitation was warranted in the child's best interest and the record showed that many overnight visits were already supervised by the father's mother, and the father's mother was apparently willing and able to supervise overnight visits. Spirnak v. Meadows, Ga. App. , 844 S.E.2d 482 (2020).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
ALR.
- Construction and effect of statutes mandating consideration of, or creating presumptions regarding, domestic violence in awarding custody of children, 51 A.L.R.5th 241.
ARTICLE 2 CHILD CUSTODY INTRASTATE JURISDICTION ACT
Law reviews.
- For survey article on domestic relations, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 113 (1982).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Editor's notes.
- For additional cases dealing with custody of children, see annotations under § 9-14-2, dealing with habeas corpus on account of detention of child, and under §§ 19-7-1 and19-7-4, dealing with parental powers and loss of parental custody.
O.C.G.A. Art. 2, Ch. 9, T. 19 has as its general purpose the promotion of stability in the home environment and secure family relationships for the child of divorced parents, deterrence of abductions and other unilateral removals of children, and facilitation of the enforcement of custody decrees. O.C.G.A. § 19-9-24 employs a "clean hands" doctrine to ensure these ends. Stewart v. Stewart, 160 Ga. App. 463, 287 S.E.2d 378 (1981).
Cited in Neal v. Washington, 158 Ga. App. 39, 279 S.E.2d 294 (1981); Hutto v. Hutto, 250 Ga. 116, 296 S.E.2d 549 (1982); Thompson v. Thompson, 241 Ga. App. 616, 526 S.E.2d 576 (1999).