Quashing Warrant or Suppressing Evidence Because of Technical Irregularity Not Affecting Substantial Rights of Accused

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

No search warrant shall be quashed or evidence suppressed because of a technical irregularity not affecting the substantial rights of the accused.

(Ga. L. 1966, p. 567, § 12; Ga. L. 1990, p. 8, § 17.)

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 29 Am. Jur. 2d, Evidence, § 584.

ALR.

- Admissibility of evidence obtained by illegal search and seizure, 24 A.L.R. 1408; 32 A.L.R. 408; 41 A.L.R. 1145; 52 A.L.R. 477; 88 A.L.R. 348; 134 A.L.R. 819; 150 A.L.R. 566; 50 A.L.R.2d 531.

Right to enforce production of papers or documents by subpoena duces tecum or other process, as affected by unlawful means by which the knowledge of their existence was acquired, 24 A.L.R. 1429.

Modern status of rule governing admissibility of evidence obtained by unlawful search and seizure, 50 A.L.R.2d 531.

Propriety of execution of search warrant at nighttime, 26 A.L.R.3d 951; 41 A.L.R.5th 171.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.