commits the offense of theft of a trade secret and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years and by a fine of not more than $50,000.00, provided that, if the value of such trade secret, and any article representing such trade secret that is taken, is not more than $100.00 such person shall be punished as for a misdemeanor.
(Ga. L. 1965, p. 647, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 1966, p. 425, §§ 1, 2, 5; Code 1933, § 26-1809, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 6, § 16; Ga. L. 1995, p. 1051, § 1.)
Cross references.- Trade secrets, § 10-1-760 et seq.
Law reviews.- For note, "Trade Secrets and Confidential Information Under Georgia Law," see 19 Ga. L. Rev. 623 (1984). For note, "Legal Remedies for Computer Abuse," see 21 Ga. St. B.J. 100 (1985).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Sufficient evidence to support conviction.
- There was legally sufficient evidence to support the defendant's conviction for theft of a trade secret under O.C.G.A. § 16-8-13 because the defendant, without authority, copied the master client list for the property management division of the defendant's employer and used the list to transfer or otherwise appropriate the employer's clients to the defendant's own new business. DuCom v. State, 288 Ga. App. 555, 654 S.E.2d 670 (2007), cert. denied, No. S08C0598, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 383 (Ga. 2008).
Cited in Duracell, Inc. v. SW Consultants, Inc., 126 F.R.D. 571 (N.D. Ga. 1989); Davis v. State, 322 Ga. App. 826, 747 S.E.2d 19 (2013).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 50 Am. Jur. 2d, Larceny, §§ 59, 67, 68.
Abandonment of Trade Secret, 41 POF2d 517.
Abandonment of Trade Secret, 100 POF3d 195.
C.J.S.- 52B C.J.S., Larceny, § 28.
ALR.
- Individual criminal responsibility of officer or employee for larceny or embezzlement, through corporate act, of property of third person, 33 A.L.R. 787.
Implied obligation of employee not to use trade secrets or confidential information for his own benefit or that of third persons after leaving the employment, 165 A.L.R. 1453.
Nature of property or rights other than tangible chattels which may be subject of conversion, 44 A.L.R.2d 927.
What constitutes "loss from theft" within provisions of Internal Revenue Code concerning deduction of losses arising from theft, 62 A.L.R.2d 572.
Right of employee who has wrongfully appropriated trade secrets, in accounting for profits, to set off losses, 67 A.L.R.2d 825; 11 A.L.R.4th 12.
Implied obligation not to use trade secrets or similar confidential information disclosed during unsuccessful negotiations for sale, license, or the like, 9 A.L.R.3d 665.
Former employee's duty, in absence of express contract, not to solicit former employer's customers or otherwise use his knowledge of customer lists acquired in earlier employment, 28 A.L.R.3d 7.
Criminal liability for misappropriation of trade secret, 84 A.L.R.3d 967.
Disclosure of trade secret as abandonment of secrecy, 92 A.L.R.3d 138.
Proper measure and elements of damages for misappropriation of trade secret, 11 A.L.R.4th 12.
Disclosure or use of computer application software as misappropriation of trade secret, 30 A.L.R.4th 1250.
What is computer "trade secret" under state law, 53 A.L.R.4th 1046.
What is "trade secret" so as to render actionable under state law its use or disclosure by former employee, 59 A.L.R.4th 641.
What constitutes tax-deductible theft loss under 26 USCS § 165, 98 A.L.R. Fed. 229.