As used in this part, the term:
Any item described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of this paragraph shall be a prohibited gambling device subject to and prohibited by this part, notwithstanding any inference to the contrary in any other law of this state.
The provisions of this part shall not be applicable to games offered by the Georgia Lottery Corporation pursuant to Chapter 27 of Title 50.
(Code 1933, § 26-2701, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, § 1; Ga. L. 1975, p. 1072, § 2; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1661, § 3; Ga. L. 1985, p. 437, § 1; Ga. L. 1986, p. 1313, § 3; Ga. L. 1987, p. 1386, § 3; Ga. L. 1995, p. 832, § 1; Ga. 2001, Ex. Sess., p. 312, § 1; Ga. L. 2012, p. 1136, § 2/SB 431; Ga. L. 2019, p. 736, § 2/HB 193.)
The 2019 amendment, effective July 1, 2019, deleted "or" at the end of subparagraph (4)(C), added "; or" at the end of division (4)(D)(ii), and added subparagraph (4)(E).
Code Commission notes.- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1988, in paragraph (4) a period was added at the end of the second sentence and a comma was added following "presentation" the second time it appeared in division (4)(B)(ii)(III).
Editor's notes.- Ga. L. 2001, Ex. Sess., p. 312, § 4, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act is not intended to, and should not be construed to, affect the legality of the repair, transport, possession, or use of otherwise prohibited gambling devices on maritime vessels within the jurisdiction of the State of Georgia. To the extent that such repair, transport, possession, or use was lawful prior to the enactment of this Act, it shall not be prohibited by this Act; and to the extent that such repair, transport, possession, or use was prohibited prior to the enactment of this Act, it shall not be permitted by this Act."
Ga. L. 2001, Ex. Sess., p. 312, § 5, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "During the period beginning January 1, 2002, and ending June 30, 2002, it shall not be unlawful to possess in this state a machine or device described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 16-12-20, if: (1) Such machine is not in use; (2) Such machine is in transit to a storage facility or in a storage facility, which said storage facility is a secured facility and no part of same is accessible by anyone other than employees of said facility or employees of the owner of said machine; and (3) Such machine is not located in a place which is open to the public and is not located in a private club."
Ga. L. 2012, p. 1136, § 4/SB 431, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that this Code section shall apply to conduct that occurs on and after May 2, 2012. It is not the intention of this Act to abate any prosecution undertaken for conduct occurring under the law in effect prior to such date, and any offense committed before May 2, 2012, shall be prosecuted and punished under the statutes in effect at the time the offense was committed.
Law reviews.- For note discussing organized crime in Georgia with respect to the application of state gambling laws, and suggesting proposals for combatting organized crime, see 7 Ga. St. B.J. 124 (1970). For comment on Boyd v. Piggly Wiggly S., Inc., 115 Ga. App. 628, 155 S.E.2d 630 (1967), see 2 Ga. L. Rev. 132 (1967).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Editor's notes.
- Editor's notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Penal Code 1895, § 406, former Penal Code 1910, §§ 397 and 398, and former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501 and 26-6502, as they read prior to revision of this title by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Applying the "actual use" test to case concerning confiscation of gambling equipment, evidence was not sufficient to subject the equipment to confiscation where it was not shown that it was actually used for gambling. Monte Carlo Parties, Ltd. v. Webb, 253 Ga. 508, 322 S.E.2d 246 (1984).
It was error to use the functional use test to find that video poker game machines were gambling devices. To reason that a machine is a gambling device merely because it mimics a card game that "historically" had been used for gambling is much the same as saying the machine is a gambling device because it could be used for gambling purposes, whether it is actually so used or not. This is the functional use test rejected in Monte Carlo Parties, Ltd. v. Webb, 253 Ga. 508, 322 S.E.2d 246 (1984). Webb v. City of Rossville, 198 Ga. App. 294, 401 S.E.2d 312 (1991).
One may be acquitted of gambling but convicted of operating a gambling house.
- Gambling is one thing and operating a gambling house is a kindred but entirely different thing and different evidence is required to convict of these separate offenses. No absurdity or repugnancy is created by acquittal of gambling and conviction of operating a gambling house. McGahee v. State, 133 Ga. App. 964, 213 S.E.2d 91 (1975).
In a lottery, there must be union of consideration, chance, and prize. Barker v. State, 56 Ga. App. 705, 193 S.E. 605 (1937) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502); Harrington v. State, 97 Ga. App. 315, 103 S.E.2d 126 (1958) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502); Boyd v. Piggly Wiggly S., Inc., 115 Ga. App. 628, 155 S.E.2d 630 (1967), for comment, see 2 Ga. L. Rev. 132 (1967) (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6501).
Three essentials of a lottery are consideration, prize, and chance. Equitable Loan & Sec. Co. v. Waring, 117 Ga. 599, 44 S.E. 320, 97 Am. St. R. 177, 62 L.R.A. 93 (1903); Sparkman v. State, 209 Ga. App. 763, 434 S.E.2d 564 (1993) (decided under former Penal Code 1895, § 406).
It matters not that value of thing hazarded is small or infinitesimal.
- "Lottery" imports a scheme or device for hazarding of money or other thing of value by chance. It matters not that value of thing hazarded is small or infinitesimal if in fact it does have some value. AAA Amusements, Inc. v. State, 106 Ga. App. 663, 127 S.E.2d 919 (1962) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502).
When only priority of payment is determined by chance, scheme does not constitute lottery. Equitable Loan & Sec. Co. v. Waring, 117 Ga. 599, 44 S.E. 320, 97 Am. St. R. 177, 62 L.R.A. 93 (1903) (decided under former Penal Code 1895, § 406).
Gift enterprise defined.
- Gift enterprise is a sporting artifice by which, for example a merchant or tradesman sells wares for their market value, but, by way of inducement, gives to each purchaser a ticket which entitles the purchaser to a chance to win certain prizes, to be determined after the manner of a lottery. Barker v. State, 56 Ga. App. 705, 193 S.E. 605 (1937) (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6501).
For definitions of "chance," "similar scheme," and "gift enterprise," see Russell v. Equitable & Sec. Co., 129 Ga. 154, 58 S.E. 881, 12 Ann. Cas. 129 (1907) (decided under former Penal Code 1895, § 406).
Punchboard constituting gambling device.
- See Hobbs v. K. & S. Sales Co., 35 Ga. App. 226, 132 S.E. 775 (1926) (decided under former Penal Code 1910, § 397).
Slot machines are not for amusement when played for something of value.
- An apparatus known as a slot machine, by which a person depositing money therein may, by chance, get directly or indirectly money or articles or value worth either more or less than money deposited, falls within purview of former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502, and cannot be treated as one kept only for amusement. Childs v. State, 70 Ga. App. 99, 27 S.E.2d 470 (1943) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502).
Possession of machines designed for gambling purposes.
- Possession of machines designed for gambling purposes is illegal under the Georgia Video Poker Act of 2001, O.C.G.A. § 16-12-20 et seq. Jones v. State, 276 Ga. App. 810, 625 S.E.2d 4 (2005).
One may be guilty of operating a gambling house without participating in actual gambling. Miller v. State, 48 Ga. App. 786, 173 S.E. 491 (1934) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502).
"Gambling devices."
- Trial court did not err in allowing the witnesses in defendant's trial for possession of illegal gambling machines to testify that the machines were "gambling devices," as the jury had to determine whether defendant sold a machine that detectives testified was set up for gambling to a witness, who then sold the machine to the detectives, and whether that machine was illegal under O.C.G.A. § 16-12-20(2); describing the machines the detectives seized as "gambling machines" did not answer those questions. Jones v. State, 276 Ga. App. 810, 625 S.E.2d 4 (2005).
Actions converted amusement machines into gambling devices.
- Judgment approving forfeiture was affirmed because by giving players cash and lottery tickets as rewards for winning games on the amusement machines, the gas station employees effectively converted the machines into gambling devices under O.C.G.A. § 16-12-32(b)(4), which clearly violated the gambling laws of Georgia prohibiting cash payouts for winning games on machines when the winnings are determined by chance even if the games involve an element of skill. Patel v. State of Ga., 341 Ga. App. 419, 801 S.E.2d 551 (2017).
Cited in Tierce v. State, 122 Ga. App. 845, 178 S.E.2d 913 (1970); St. John's Melkite Catholic Church v. Commissioner of Revenue, 240 Ga. 733, 242 S.E.2d 108 (1978); Drewry v. State, 201 Ga. App. 674, 411 S.E.2d 898 (1991); State v. Old South Amusements, Inc., 275 Ga. 274, 564 S.E.2d 710 (2002).
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Editor's notes.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501 and 26-6502 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Electronic slot machines are gambling devices per se; the slot machines are contraband; the slot machines can be seized and destroyed as contraband; possession of such devices is a crime; no demonstration of operation of any such device is necessary antecedent to the machine's seizure, nor is any demonstration necessary to establish basis of criminal prosecution for possession of that device. 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 71-167.
Fund-raising activities constituting gambling.- Certain fund-raising activities, often for charitable purposes and generally designated as "Las Vegas Night" or "Casino Night," constitute gambling or commercial gambling and the equipment used at these activities is gambling paraphernalia. 1983 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 83-48.
Pinball machines operated for amusement and not gaming or gambling are legal.- Keeping, maintaining or employing of slot machines is a misdemeanor, however, keeping, maintaining or employing of pinball machines is not illegal where they are operated for purpose of amusement and no gaming or gambling is connected with their operation. 1945-47 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 104 (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6502).
Only if a coin-operated game can register more than fifteen free replays and has a "trip switch" allowing games to be erased other than by reactivating the machine for additional plays is the device a prohibited gambling device; if such a game is for bona fide amusement purposes only, it is legal. However, the transfer of anything of value in exchange for a free replay on any coin operated device, whether or not the device constitutes a gambling device per se, is illegal. 1990 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 90-15.
Video slot machine which involves no skill in the machine's operation and offers a ticket for a value of up to $5.00 in merchandise is a "gambling device". 1996 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U96-18.
Operation of a sweepstakes where a player can determine if the player has the "winning number" by calling a "dial-it" number is a "lottery," as that term is defined by O.C.G.A. § 16-12-20. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-83.
Gift-enterprise and sweepstake schemes constitute lotteries, and are prohibited in Georgia. 1973 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U73-115.
Bonuses or rebates to customers who provide for additional sales of produce are not lotteries. 1962 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 447 (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6501).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 38 Am. Jur. 2d, Gambling, §§ 5 et seq., 64, 65.
C.J.S.- 38 C.J.S., Gaming, §§ 1, 2, 11 et seq., 147 et seq.
ALR.
- Loan or investment association as a lottery, 28 A.L.R. 1311.
Scheme by which award depends upon votes as a lottery, 41 A.L.R. 1484.
Scheme for advertising or stimulating legitimate business as a lottery, 48 A.L.R. 1115; 57 A.L.R. 424; 103 A.L.R. 866; 109 A.L.R. 709; 113 A.L.R. 1121.
Slot vending machine as gambling device, 81 A.L.R. 177.
Coin-operated or slot machines as lottery, 101 A.L.R. 1126.
"Numbers (or number) game" or "policy game" as a lottery, 105 A.L.R. 305.
Constitutionality of statute prohibiting giving of premiums or trading stamps with purchases of commodities, 124 A.L.R. 341; 133 A.L.R. 1087.
Slot machine within prohibitory statute or ordinance as limited to gambling device, 132 A.L.R. 1004.
What are games of chance, games of skill, and mixed games of chance and skill, 135 A.L.R. 104.
Punchboard as a lottery, 163 A.L.R. 1279.
Coin-operated pinball machine or similar device, played for amusement only or confining reward to privilege of free replays, as prohibited or permitted by antigambling laws, 89 A.L.R.2d 815.
Bridge as within gambling laws, 97 A.L.R.2d 1420.
Paraphernalia or appliances used for recording gambling transactions or receiving or furnishing gambling information as gaming "devices" within criminal statute or ordinance, 1 A.L.R.3d 726.
Validity of pyramid distribution plan, 54 A.L.R.3d 217.
Validity of statute or ordinance prohibiting or regulating bookmaking or pool selling, 80 A.L.R.4th 1079.
Right to recover money lent for gambling purposes, 74 A.L.R.5th 369.