The Supreme Court shall have the authority by appropriate orders, upon recommendation made by the State Bar of Georgia, to adopt rules and regulations for the organization and government of the unified state bar and to define the rights, duties, and obligations of the members therein, including the payment of a reasonable license fee, and otherwise to regulate and govern the practice of law in this state, to the end that the unified state bar shall promote the best interest of the public by maintaining high standards of conduct in the legal profession and by aiding in the efficient administration of justice.
(Ga. L. 1963, p. 70, § 2.)
Law reviews.- For article discussing the proposed Georgia plan for specialization in the legal field, see 12 Ga. St. B.J. 171 (1976). For comment, "The Officer Has No Robes: A Formalist Solution to the Expansion of Quasi-Judicial Immunity," see 66 Emory L.J. 123 (2016).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Supreme Court has the inherent power to govern the practice of law in this state. Fleming v. State, 246 Ga. 90, 270 S.E.2d 185, cert. denied, 449 U.S. 904, 101 S. Ct. 278, 66 L. Ed. 2d 136 (1980).
Unconstitutional regulation of practice of law.
- Occupational tax ordinance levied on professionals and requiring registration and a fee payment at the beginning of each year, prior to the transaction of business, operated as an unconstitutional precondition on the practice of law. Sexton v. City of Jonesboro, 267 Ga. 571, 481 S.E.2d 818 (1997).
Ordinance regulating legal profession unconstitutional.
- Ordinance of the City of Savannah which purported to license attorneys at law practicing in that city was regulatory in nature and contravened Ga. Const. 1945, Art. I, Sec. II, Para. VII (see now Ga. Const. 1983, Art. III, Sec. VI, Para. IV), for the reason that the power to license and regulate attorneys at law is vested in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia and administered through that court and through the State Bar of Georgia pursuant to Ga. L. 1963, p. 70, §§ 1 and 2 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 15-19-30 and15-19-31). Silverman v. Mayor of Savannah, 125 Ga. App. 41, 186 S.E.2d 447 (1971).
Doctrine of judicial immunity.- Since it was the Georgia Supreme Court, and not the State Bar, that ordered the suspension of the plaintiff, the act was clearly a judicial act within the constitutional power of the State Supreme Court and the State Bar was entitled to judicial immunity from liability for damages. Cohran v. State Bar, 790 F. Supp. 1568 (N.D. Ga. 1992).
Municipality barred from regulating legal profession.
- No municipality may, by regulatory licensing ordinance, regulate the legal profession, although a municipality may levy an occupational or license tax upon the practice of law within its municipal limits. Silverman v. Mayor of Savannah, 125 Ga. App. 41, 186 S.E.2d 447 (1971).
Cited in State Bar v. Ellis, 116 Ga. App. 721, 158 S.E.2d 280 (1967); Zagoria v. DuBose Enters., Inc., 163 Ga. App. 880, 296 S.E.2d 353 (1982).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 7 Am. Jur. 2d, Attorneys at Law, § 7.
C.J.S.- 7 C.J.S., Attorney and Client, § 43.
ALR.
- Misconduct of one partner in a law firm as a factor in disbarment or other disciplinary proceedings against other partner, 157 A.L.R. 613.