(Code 1981, §15-11-442, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 1-1/HB 242; Ga. L. 2014, p. 780, § 1-34/SB 364; Ga. L. 2017, p. 604, § 1-3/SB 175.)
Cross references.- Power of juvenile court to require restitution by unruly child as condition or limitation of probation, § 17-14-5.
Further provisions regarding commitment of unruly child to Department of Juvenile Justice, §§ 49-4A-8 and49-5-7.
Administrative Rules and Regulations.- Regional Educational Services, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Georgia Department of Education, Chapter 160-5-1.
Law reviews.- For note criticizing jurisdiction of juvenile justice system over runaways and advocating alternative legal approaches, see 24 Emory L. J. 1075 (1975).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Editor's notes.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under pre-2014 Code Section 15-11-67, which was subsequently repealed but was succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section. See the Editor's notes at the beginning of the chapter.
Applicability.
- Contrary to the defendant's claims, neither former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-67 (see now O.C.G.A. § 15-11-442) nor former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-48(e) (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 15-11-135,15-11-400, and15-11-412) applied to the defendant's case because both provisions applied when the child was found "unruly," and the defendant was adjudicated delinquent, not unruly. In the Interest of B. Q. L. E., 297 Ga. App. 273, 676 S.E.2d 742, cert. denied, No. S09C1197, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 787 (Ga. 2009) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-67).
Petition insufficient to charge juvenile as unruly.
- Juvenile court erred in denying the defendant juvenile's special demurrer to a petition accusing the juvenile of being unruly pursuant to former O.C.G.A. §§ 15-11-2 and15-11-67 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 15-11-2,15-11-381,15-11-442, and15-11-471) because the petition did not allege the defendant's misconduct with particularity, and the defendant was unable to determine what acts of disobedience supported the allegation that the defendant was unruly; although the petition alleged the date the defendant was disobedient, the petition provided no factual details, and the petition merely mirrored the language of former § 15-11-2(12)(B) (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 15-11-2,15-11-381, and15-11-471). In the Interest of C.H., 306 Ga. App. 834, 703 S.E.2d 407 (2010) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-67).
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Editor's notes.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under pre-2000 Code Section 15-11-36, which was subsequently repealed but was succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section. See the Editor's notes at the beginning of the chapter.
All costs related to subsistence and detention, including emergency medical costs, incurred on behalf of juveniles held in Department of Juvenile Justice facilities prior to a formal commitment to the Department of Juvenile Justice are properly assessed to the counties. 2002 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 2002-6 (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-36).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 42 Am. Jur. 2d, Infants, § 50. 47 Am. Jur. 2d, Juvenile Courts and Delinquent and Dependent Children, §§ 7, 56 et seq.
C.J.S.- 43 C.J.S., Infants, § 234 et seq.
U.L.A.- Uniform Juvenile Court Act (U.L.A.) § 32.
ALR.- Applicability of double jeopardy to juvenile court proceedings, 5 A.L.R.4th 234.
Truancy as indicative of delinquency or incorrigibility, justifying commitment of infant or juvenile, 5 A.L.R.4th 1211.