As used in this chapter, the term:
(16.1) "Foreign limited liability company" means a limited liability company formed under the laws of a jurisdiction other than this state.
(19.1) "Limited liability company" means any limited liability company formed under Chapter 11 of this title.
(Code 1981, §14-3-140, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 465, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2108, § 2; Ga. L. 1997, p. 1165, § 12.1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 405, § 17; Ga. L. 2004, p. 508, § 22; Ga. L. 2005, p. 60, § 14/HB 95; Ga. L. 2008, p. 181, § 14/HB 1216; Ga. L. 2016, p. 225, § 2-2/SB 128.)
The 2016 amendment, effective July 1, 2016, added paragraphs (16.1) and (19.1).
Cross references.- Status of corporations as persons, § 1-2-1.
COMMENTWhile some Articles and Parts of the Code contain specialized definitions applicable only to those Articles and Parts, this section contains defined terms used throughout the Code. Many of these definitions are the same as their Business Code counterparts, and most of those that are not are self-explanatory.
The term "articles" is synonymous with "articles of incorporation" throughout the Code.
"Board of directors" is synonymous with "board" throughout the Code and is defined to mean the person(s) authorized to manage the corporation's affairs, regardless of the name or title given to such person(s).
"Distribution" is a central concept of the Code and it differs from its Business Code counterpart. The term is defined to include the payment of any part of a nonprofit corporation's income or profit to its members, directors, or officers. Distributions are generally prohibited except as permitted in section 14-3-1302. Payment by the corporation of such expenses as reasonable compensation or indemnification is not a "distribution."
"Member" is defined as any person who is entitled to vote for the election of a director or directors pursuant to a provision in the corporation's bylaws or articles that expressly provides for members or contemplates the existence of members. If the articles or bylaws so provide, the person with such voting right is a "member" for purposes of the Code, regardless of the name or title by which such person is designated in the corporation's articles or bylaws.
"Superior court" is defined to cover contingencies such as the absence of a registered or principal office of a nonprofit corporation.
Source: Model Act § 2.
Note to 1997 Amendment The 1997 amendment amended paragraph (13) by adding limited partnerships, limited liability companies, and limited liability partnerships to the list of entities, conforming the definition to that of the Business Corporation Code.
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Editor's notes.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1933, § 114-101, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Test for determining whether organization is nonprofit is not whether it has an excess of income over expenses for several years. Georgia Osteopathic Hosp. v. Strickland, 123 Ga. App. 86, 179 S.E.2d 560 (1970) (decided under former Code 1933, § 114-101).
"Charitable" and "nonprofit" are not synonymous. Georgia Osteopathic Hosp. v. Strickland, 123 Ga. App. 86, 179 S.E.2d 560 (1970) (decided under former Code 1933, § 114-101).
Workers' Compensation Law made applicable to nonprofit business corporations.
- Prior to 1975, when § 34-9-1 read "corporation engaged in any business operated for gain or profit," it included by definition only the profit-making private business corporation as provided for in Ch. 2 of this title. The deletion by the 1975 amendment of the words "operated for gain or profit" broadened the coverage of the § 34-9-1 definition of employer to include private nonprofit corporations as provided for in Ch. 3 of this title. Fulton-DeKalb Hosp. Auth. v. Gaither, 241 Ga. 572, 247 S.E.2d 89 (1978) (decided under former Code 1933, § 114-101).
Hospital authorities exempted from Business Corporation Code.
- The phrase "corporations engaged in any business" in § 34-9-1 includes only those corporations governed by the Georgia Business Corporation Code. Hospital authorities are not governed by Georgia Business Corporation Code, but are expressly exempted therefrom. Fulton-DeKalb Hosp. Auth. v. Gaither, 241 Ga. 572, 247 S.E.2d 89 (1978) (decided under former Code 1933, § 114-101).
Membership found.
- For purposes of interlocutory injunctive relief, the trial court properly found that the second of two factions controlled a nonprofit corporation. There was evidence that the corporation, a temple, had members, consisting of people who regularly attended the temple and participated in its events; furthermore, there was evidence that the members had been properly notified of an annual meeting and that more than 50 percent of the members appeared at the meeting and voted unanimously to elect the second faction to the board of directors. Nguyen v. Tran, 287 Ga. App. 888, 652 S.E.2d 881 (2007).
Authority of court to order accounting.
- Trial court properly dismissed the tobacco farmers' claim for an equitable accounting of a tobacco cooperative because it was undisputed that that the tobacco cooperative was a foreign corporation organized under North Carolina law and, therefore, the trial court lacked the authority to order an inspection of the tobacco cooperative's records. Rigby v. Flue-Cured Tobacco Coop. Stabilization Corp., 327 Ga. App. 29, 755 S.E.2d 915 (2014).
Natural gas company's certification application properly denied.
- Georgia Public Service Commission was authorized to dismiss a natural gas company's application for certification because creation of a natural gas company as a Limited Liability Company (LLC) wholly owned by the city's utility board was in derogation of a city charter as the charter required the utility board to create a wholly owned subsidiary in the form of a non-profit corporation rather than a LLC, thus, the city's creation of a LLC was an ultra vires act. Infinite Energy v. Marietta Natural Gas, 349 Ga. App. 343, 826 S.E.2d 189 (2019).
Cited in Bartley v. Augusta Country Club, Inc., 166 Ga. App. 1, 303 S.E.2d 129 (1983).
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Regional Development Center as "entity".
- Because a Regional Development Center is a public agency and an instrumentality of the municipalities and counties in its region, it is not an entity authorized by law to create a nonprofit corporation. 1992 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 92-1.
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 18 Am. Jur. 2d, Corporations, § 1 et seq.
C.J.S.- 10 C.J.S., Beneficial Associations, § 7.
ALR.
- Applicability to corporations not organized for profit of statutes prescribing conditions under which foreign corporations may do business within state, 37 A.L.R. 1283.
Nonprofit purposes and character which warrant creation of nonprofit corporation, 16 A.L.R.2d 1345.