(Code 1981, §14-2-151, enacted by Ga. L. 1989, p. 946, § 8; Ga. L. 1992, p. 1180, § 1.)
Editor's notes.- Ga. L. 1992, p. 1180, § 3, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that the amendment to this Code section was applicable to acts occurring prior to July 1, 1992, as well as to acts occurring on or after such date.
COMMENT
Source: Former O.C.G.A. § 14-2-4 (1982).
This section restores provisions of former section 14-2-4 that were an addition to Model Act provisions when enacted in 1968. Subsections (a) and (b) correspond to former subsections (a) and (b) of the prior code provision, while subsection (c) corresponds to former subsection (d). This section omits provisions of former law that specified which corporate officers must sign corporate documents required by the code, and omits provisions relating to deeds. The effect of a seal upon deeds is governed by Code Section 14-5-7.
Cross-References Power to have a corporate seal, see § 14-2-302(2). Required officers, see § 14-2-840. "Secretary" defined, see § 14-2-140. Signatures, see §§ 14-2-150 &14-2-625.
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Signature in representative capacity without seal.
- The presence of an unattested corporate seal and an individual signature on a promissory note placed the instrument within the representative capacity provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, so as to permit the introduction of parol evidence to show agency. Hartkopf v. Heinrich Ad. Berkemann, 200 Ga. App. 355, 408 S.E.2d 450, cert. denied, 200 Ga. App. 896, 408 S.E.2d 450 (1991).
Corporate seal not requirement for valid corporate assignment of deed.
- Unlike the current version of O.C.G.A. § 14-5-7, the prior version (effective until June 30, 2011) lacked explicit language that a corporate seal was not required for a conclusively valid corporate conveyance; yet, the applicable Georgia law still revealed that a corporate seal was not a requirement for a valid corporate assignment of deed. Foster v. Homeward Residential Inc. (In re Foster), 500 Bankr. 197 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2013).
Section not persuasive in actions against individuals.
- O.C.G.A. § 14-2-151, authorizing an action against a corporation because of the corporate seal, is not persuasive in an action brought against a party individually. Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga. App. 322, 405 S.E.2d 265, cert. denied, 199 Ga. App. 906, 405 S.E.2d 265 (1991); Castellana v. Conyers Toyota, Inc., 200 Ga. App. 161, 407 S.E.2d 64 (1991).
ARTICLE 2 INCORPORATION
Administrative Rules and Regulations.
- Articles of Incorporation, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Office of Secretary of State, Commissioner of Corporations, Chapter 590-7-3.
Law reviews.- For article discussing the advantage of incorporation by farmers, see 4 Ga. St. B. J. 335 (1968). For article, "Comparison of Features of Old and New Business Corporation Laws Relating to Domestic Corporations," see 5 Ga. St. B. J. 13 (1968). For article, "Foreign Corporations in Georgia," see 10 Ga. St. B. J. 243 (1973). For article, "Changes in Corporate Practice under Georgia's New Business Corporation Code," see 40 Mercer L. Rev. 655 (1989). For article, "Georgia's New Business Corporation Code," see 24 Ga. St. B. J. 158 (1988).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
ALR.
- Liability of officers, directors, or members of defectively organized corporation to one of their number for advances, commissions, etc., 115 A.L.R. 658.
Organization sought to be incorporated under an unconstitutional statute as a de facto corporation, 136 A.L.R. 187.
Construction and effect of corporate articles, charter, or bylaws limiting duration or maturity of its indebtedness, 55 A.L.R.2d 949.
Liability of attorney for improper or ineffective incorporation of client, 40 A.L.R.4th 535.