Denial, Revocation, or Suspension of License; Grounds; Review of Decision
-
Law
-
Georgia Code
-
Conservation and Natural Resources
-
Asbestos Safety
- Denial, Revocation, or Suspension of License; Grounds; Review of Decision
- The director may refuse to grant a license to an applicant or may revoke or suspend the license of a person licensed by the director for cause, including but not limited to the following:
- Making any false statement or giving any false information in connection with an application for license, including an application for renewal;
- Violation of this chapter or violation of any rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to the authority contained in this chapter; or
- Failure to demonstrate the qualifications or standards for licensure contained in this chapter or in the rules and regulations of the board. It shall be incumbent upon the applicant to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the director that he or she meets all the requirements for licensure; and, if the director is not satisfied as to the applicant's qualifications, he or she shall have the power to deny such licensure.
- Review of a decision of the director under this chapter shall be in accordance with Chapter 13 of Title 50, the "Georgia Administrative Procedure Act."
(Code 1981, §12-12-9, enacted by Ga. L. 1986, p. 1157, § 1; Ga. L. 1996, p. 238, § 1.)
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Basis for suspension or revocation.
- Although the Asbestos Licensing Board has the authority to suspend or revoke a license or certificate based upon a knowing violation of this chapter or the rules and regulations promulgated thereto, such a suspension may be based upon "poor work practices" only when such work practices constitute a violation of the work practice rules and regulations established by the Department of Natural Resources. 1992 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 92-20.
Additional regulations not required.
- O.C.G.A. § 12-12-9 establishes the basis upon which the Asbestos Licensing Board may seek to revoke or suspend a license or certificate and provides the hearing procedures to be followed; therefore, the Board need not enact additional regulations. 1992 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 92-20.
Download our app to see the most-to-date content.