Effectiveness of Right of Recoupment or Set-Off Against Deposit Account

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

  1. Exercise of recoupment or set-off. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c) of this Code section, a bank with which a deposit account is maintained may exercise any right of recoupment or set-off against a secured party that holds a security interest in the deposit account.
  2. Recoupment or set-off not affected by security interest. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c) of this Code section, the application of this article to a security interest in a deposit account does not affect a right of recoupment or set-off of the secured party as to a deposit account maintained with the secured party.
  3. When set-off ineffective. The exercise by a bank of a set-off against a deposit account is ineffective against a secured party that holds a security interest in the deposit account which is perfected by control under paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of Code Section 11-9-104, if the set-off is based on a claim against the debtor.

(Code 1981, §11-9-340, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 362, § 1.)

RESEARCH REFERENCES

U.L.A.

- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 9-340.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.