Except as provided in subsection (3), the lessor shall hold for the lessee for the remaining lease term of the lease agreement any goods that have been identified to the lease contract and are in the lessor's control.
The lessor may dispose of the goods at any time before collection of the judgment for damages obtained pursuant to subsection (1).If the disposition is before the end of the remaining lease term of the lease agreement, the lessor's recovery against the lessee for damages is governed by Code Section 11-2A-527 or Code Section 11-2A-528, and the lessor will cause an appropriate credit to be provided against a judgment for damages to the extent that the amount of the judgment exceeds the recovery available pursuant to Code Section 11-2A-527 or 11-2A-528.
Payment of the judgment for damages obtained pursuant to subsection (1) entitles the lessee to the use and possession of the goods not then disposed of for the remaining lease term of and in accordance with the lease agreement.
After default by the lessee under the lease contract of the type described in Code Section 11-2A-523(1) or Code Section 11-2A-523(3)(a) or, if agreed, after other default by the lessee, a lessor who is held not entitled to rent under this section must nevertheless be awarded damages for non-acceptance under Code Section 11-2A-527 or Code Section 11-2A-528.
(Code 1981, §11-2A-529, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 633, § 1.)
RESEARCH REFERENCES
U.L.A.
- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 2A-529.
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Erroneous finding or interpretation.
- Because the trial court did not find any material miscalculation of figures in an arbitrator's award, mistake in the award's descriptions, or imperfection in the form of the award, but refused to apply O.C.G.A. § 11-2A-529(1)(b), opting instead to apply O.C.G.A. § 11-2A-528(1)(ii), it substituted its judgment for that of the arbitrator, in violation of 9 U.S.C. § 11, as to whether a lessor had shown an inability to reasonably dispose of the leased equipment, and it penalized the lessor for not relitigating the issue at the trial court level, which amounted to reversible error. Lanier Worldwide, Inc. v. BridgeCenters at Park Meadows, LLC, 279 Ga. App. 879, 633 S.E.2d 49 (2006).