This article shall be known and may be cited as "Uniform Commercial Code - Sales."
(Code 1933, § 109A-2 - 101, enacted by Ga. L. 1962, p. 156, § 1.)
Law reviews.- For article, "The Good Faith Purchase Idea and the Uniform Commercial Code," see 15 Ga. L. Rev. 605 (1981). For comment, "Medical Expert Systems and Publisher Liability: A Cross-Contextual Analysis," see 43 Emory L.J. 731 (1994).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Coverage of article.
- Article 2 of the Georgia Commercial Code, O.C.G.A. § 11-2-101 et seq., applied to a contract because the sale of goods, the dirt which the seller offered to furnish to the buyer, was the predominant purpose of the contemplated transaction. Furthermore, the trial court did not err in putting the question of predominant purpose to the jury because the evidence permitted a rational jury to resolve this issue in a way that would lead to a conclusion that the sale of goods under O.C.G.A. § 11-2-107(1) was the predominant purpose of the contemplated transaction. Paramount Contr. Co. v. DPS Indus., 309 Ga. App. 113, 709 S.E.2d 288 (2011).
Cited in Rollins Communications, Inc. v. Georgia Inst. of Real Estate, Inc., 140 Ga. App. 448, 231 S.E.2d 397 (1976); Citicorp Indus. Credit, Inc. v. Rountree, 185 Ga. App. 417, 364 S.E.2d 65 (1987); Jones v. Baran Co., LLC, 290 Ga. App. 578, 660 S.E.2d 420 (2008).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 15A Am. Jur. 2d, Commercial Code, § 69. 64 Am. Jur. 2d, Public Works and Contracts, § 17.
6 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Commercial Code, § 2:2.
C.J.S.- 82 C.J.S., Statutes, §§ 217 et seq., 238.
U.L.A.- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 2-101.
ALR.- Preemption of strict liability in tort by provisions of UCC Article 2, 15 A.L.R.4th 791.
Impracticability of performance of sales contract under UCC § 2-615, 55 A.L.R.5th 1.