(Ga. L. 1967, p. 674, § 2; Ga. L. 1999, p. 1229, § 1; Ga. L. 2020, p. 156, § 8/SB 462.)
The 2020 amendment, effective June 30, 2020, substituted "installment loan" for "industrial loan" in the second sentence of paragraph (a)(12). See the Editor's notes for applicability.
Editor's notes.- Ga. L. 2020, p. 156, § 10/SB 462, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall apply to all installment loan agreements entered into on and after July 1, 2020."
Law reviews.- For article, "Eleventh Circuit Survey: January 1, 2008 - December 31, 2008: Article: Bankruptcy," see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 1141 (2009). For article, "The Over-Encumbered Trade-In in Chapter 13," see 29 Emory Bankr. Dev. J. 15 (2012).
JUDICIAL DECISIONSANALYSIS
Cited in Holden v. Peoples, Inc., 122 Ga. App. 269, 176 S.E.2d 516 (1970); Pike v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 125 Ga. App. 83, 186 S.E.2d 482 (1971); Tollett v. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc., 190 Ga. App. 295, 379 S.E.2d 2 (1989); Ervin v. Arnold, 197 Ga. App. 841, 399 S.E.2d 548 (1990); SunTrust Bank v. Venable, 299 Ga. 655, 791 S.E.2d 5 (2016).
Retail Installment Transaction
Not "retail installment transaction" when bank, not seller, obtains lien.
- When seller sold mobile home for a "cash sales price" and bank financed loan for the "cash sales price," the proceeds of which were then paid to the seller, the bank, not the seller, had a purchase money security interest in the mobile home, and the actual sale was not a "retail installment transaction" under paragraphs (a)(9) and (a)(11) of this section. Massey v. Stephens, 155 Ga. App. 243, 270 S.E.2d 796 (1980).
Motor Vehicle
Caterpillar 977L Traxcavator does not fall under the definition of "motor vehicle" found either in paragraph (a)(4) of O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31 or the general definition of "motor vehicle" under O.C.G.A. § 40-1-1(33) but does fit the definition of "special mobile equipment" under § 40-1-1(59). Battle v. Yancey Bros. Co., 157 Ga. App. 277, 277 S.E.2d 280 (1981).
Purchase money interest in negative equity financed as part of trade-in.
- Because the definition of "cash sales price" included any amount paid to the buyer or to a third party to satisfy a lease on or a lien on or a security interest in a motor vehicle used as a trade-in, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31, that entire amount was included in the purchase money security interest under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a). In re Graupner, 356 Bankr. 907 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006), aff'd, NO. 4:07-CV-37 (CDL), 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46144 (M.D. Ga. 2007).
Monies paid on debtor's behalf for an extended service contract and gap insurance were part of the purchase price of the debtor's vehicle for purposes of O.C.G.A. § 11-9-103 and the unnumbered, hanging paragraph following 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(9). The service contract was a charge for "servicing" the motor vehicle under O.C.G.A § 10-1-31(a)(1), and applying the close nexus standard in § 11-9-103 led the court to believe that gap insurance was also included in the purchase money security interest. In re Spratling, 377 Bankr. 941 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2007).
Under O.C.G.A. §§ 10-1-31(a) and11-9-103, negative equity in a debtor's trade-in vehicle was properly regarded as a purchase money security interest under the hanging paragraph referencing 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5) in that there was a close nexus to the purchase of a vehicle for personal use within 910 days of filing for Chapter 13 relief. Thus, 11 U.S.C. § 506 did not apply to cram down the creditor's secured claim. Graupner v. Nuvell Credit Corp. (In re Graupner), 537 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2008).
Notice objection did not apply.
- With respect to the creditor's deficiency claim arising from a sale of a truck in which the creditor had perfected a first-priority lien, the debtor's objection based on O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31, which requires additional notice to recover a deficiency against a buyer, did not apply to bar the claim because the creditor was not a sales finance company under the Georgia statute given that it had not purchased a retail installment contract from a seller and was not engaged in the business of purchasing retail installment contracts. Ambrose v. Advantage Funding Commer. Capital Corp. (In re Ambrose), 568 Bankr. 716 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2017).