Final written expression: Parol or extrinsic evidence.

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented (a) by course of performance, course of dealing or usage of trade as provided by section 42a-1-303; and (b) by evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement.

(1959, P.A. 133, S. 2-202; P.A. 05-109, S. 24.)

History: P.A. 05-109 replaced references to Secs. 42a-1-205 and 42a-2-208 with reference to Sec. 42a-1-303 and made a technical change to conform to revisions made to article 1 by the same act.

Cited. 183 C. 266; 198 C. 624; 218 C. 281; Id., 297; 225 C. 401; 232 C. 272.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.