(1) After a decision has been made by the commission or after a decision recommended by an individual commissioner or administrative law judge has become the decision of the commission, as provided in this article, any party thereto may within twenty days thereafter, or within such additional time as the commission may authorize upon request made within such period, make application for rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration of the same or of any matter determined therein. Such application shall be governed by such general rules as the commission may establish and shall specify with particularity the grounds upon which the applicant considers the decision unlawful. Any such application shall, within thirty days after the filing thereof, be considered and acted upon by the commission. Failure to act upon the application within such period shall constitute a denial thereof. Rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration may be granted if sufficient reason therefor is shown.
An application for rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration of a decision of thecommission made in accordance with the provisions of this section and the rules and regulations of the commission shall not stay or postpone such decision unless the commission, upon motion by the party seeking such stay or postponement or the commission upon its own motion, so orders; except that orders of the commission issued for the installation of automatic or other safety appliance signals or devices at railroad crossings shall be processed and handled to completion when such application deals solely with the matter of allocation of the costs thereof among the railroad company and the state and the political subdivisions pursuant to section 40-4106.
If after rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration of a decision of the commission itappears that the original decision is in any respect unjust or unwarranted, the commission may reverse, change, or modify the same accordingly. Any decision made after rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration, reversing, changing, or modifying the original decision may be subject to the same provisions with respect to rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration as an original decision or any such decision may be subject to judicial review as provided in section 40-6-115, at the option of the party seeking review. If the commission denies said application, the original order shall become effective according to its terms, unless the commission otherwise orders, except as provided in section 40-6-116.
If no application for rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration has been made or, ifmade, is withdrawn, a suit to enforce, enjoin, suspend, modify, or set aside any final decision of the commission, in whole or in part, may be brought in a district court of the state of Colorado as set forth in this article; except that, if any party to a proceeding applies for reconsideration, reargument, or rehearing, no other party may appeal until the commission has ruled on the application. For purposes of judicial review, a decision on an application for rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration shall be deemed final on the date said decision is served on the parties to the proceeding.
Any court may stay or suspend, in whole or in part, the operation of any commissiondecision under section 40-6-116, even though the commission had not been previously requested to suspend or stay such decision.
(Deleted by amendment, L. 93, p. 2065, § 20, effective July 1, 1993.)
Source: L. 13: p. 496, § 51. C.L. § 2960. CSA: C. 137, § 51. L. 53: p. 470, § 1. CRS 53: § 115-6-14. L. 61: p. 630, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 115-6-14. L. 69: p. 949, § 46. L. 77: (2) amended, p. 1859, § 1, effective May 20. L. 81: (2) amended, p. 1924, § 1, effective March 27. L. 89: (1) amended, p. 1532, § 16, effective April 12. L. 92: (3), (4), and (5) amended and (6) added, p. 2130, § 2, effective July 1. L. 93: (4) and (6) amended, p. 2065, § 20, effective July 1.